Worst Front Office EVER
36 replies
How the heck can we miss out on players like RB QB and TE that we needed when our old reject front office Spielman picks up a good QB an TE while we founder in the abysis.
Please let me know this is terrible, welcome to Suckville
Very good thread stating the obvious kid, and we ned another TE with speed to help the QB
"dgb11112 wrote:
How the heck can we miss out on players like RB QB and TE that we needed when our old reject front office Spielman picks up a good QB an TE while we founder in the abysis.
Please let me know this is terrible, welcome to Suckville
OL was also a pretty big need as well. Was it not?
Make the throwback uniforms permanent!
And It was addressed. what about moving some dead weight players for a trade back into the 2nd round.
"dgb11112 wrote:
And It was addressed. what about moving some dead weight players for a trade back into the 2nd round.
As I was reminded with the CBA in effect players cant be traded.
"It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." -Charles Darwin
Here we gooooo
"It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." -Charles Darwin
"dgb11112 wrote:
How the heck can we miss out on players like RB QB and TE that we needed when our old reject front office Spielman picks up a good QB an TE while we founder in the abysis.
Please let me know this is terrible, welcome to Suckville
And there is your RB. Way to proclaim the suck quotient after one pick....
The greatest value of the past is how wisely we invest it in the future.
- Jim Rohn
ggod thread? delusional thread. Oh by the way we just got Danial Thomas RB
If you could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of your trouble, you wouldn't sit for a month.
Theodore Roosevelt
"phineas64 wrote:
And there is your RB. Way to proclaim the suck quotient after one pick....
I proclaim it even more now. Daniel Thomas seriously? That's the best we could come up with?
Trading up and giving up picks to take a plug and play RB? Thread might have been crap before the pick, but after I think it has some merit.
The pick is fine. It's the situation the team is in that's the problem. Thomas has decent speed and is a good replacement for a worn-down Ronnie Brown and Ricky Williams. Good player, good value. Pick up another RB in the fourth round though with big play ability.
Bring this man back into the fold if you want some real leadership on this team.
"dgb11112 wrote:
Very good thread stating the obvious kid, and we ned another TE with speed to help the QB
We're a running team that couldn't run the ball and doesn't have it's starting 2 running backs. Are you mental? lol.

"texanphinatic wrote:
I proclaim it even more now. Daniel Thomas seriously? That's the best we could come up with?
He's the best back on the board. I'm not sure what you're complaining about here.

"ToddsPhins wrote:
We're a running team that couldn't run the ball and doesn't have it's starting 2 running backs. Are you mental? lol.
And we could have taken one in the 3rd round and not lost picks. Daniel Thomas is NOT a good enough player to give up those picks.
LOL
Unbelievable..........looking forward to 2012 draft............if this staff is not around. Hell they'd screw up a #1 pick.
"ToddsPhins wrote:
He's the best back on the board. I'm not sure what you're complaining about here.
Hes slow, fumbles, not great burst. We drafting a worse version of ronnie that fumbles. What is there to like?
God do we SUCK
Mallett goes to the pats as "their top rated QB on the board" uuggghhhh. That should end the debate as to wether he is any good.
"It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." -Charles Darwin
It's unreal how many people are ready to condemn these picks, Loosen up people it's a wait and see game, Daniel Thomas may be a stud for us, maybe maybe not, wait and see. The front office has a plan and has not shared it with the rest of us so if you take the time and try to understand the plan it may make sense. OR we just might be up the creek :)
Patience !!!
"dolfndav34 wrote:
It's unreal how many people are ready to condemn these picks, Loosen up people it's a wait and see game, Daniel Thomas may be a stud for us, maybe maybe not, wait and see. The front office has a plan and has not shared it with the rest of us so if you take the time and try to understand the plan it may make sense. OR we just might be up the creek :)
Patience !!!
Randy Mueller and Cam Cameron had a plan. Nick Saban had a plan.
All I know is that so far the "plan" has produced a pair of 7-9 seasons, seen most of the coaching staff dismissed, seen a lack of QB, seen safe safe and more safe, and now seen us pick a guard in round 1 and pick a worse version of Ronnie Brown with fumbleitis in round 2 after trading half our remaining picks to do it.
By far the worst FO in the league today. Congrats to the Patriots ensuring they'll be AFC Champs for the next decade at least, while we ensure another mediocre season, with no QB to speak of.

"KingMotion wrote:
As for slow, he ran the 40 with a low of 4.52, Mark Ingram's low. Ingram's 10 yard split was 1.53, Thomas's was 1.54. Please, spare the BS.
Who gives a **** about Ingram? i think Ingram is extremely overrated. I dont like the Thomas pick at all. All offseason the front office is talking about adding explosiveness and speed. Then we trade up to draft a mediocre RB. I'd be much happier taking Kendall Hunter at 79, and then Bilal Powell in the 6th, while keeping all of our picks. All I know is we better hit a homerun at TE in the 4th round or Im gonna be pissed.
Thank you for agreeing, perhaps the less knowledgeable with refute this yet again.