Who do you take at #6?
213 replies
TUAtionsEndNew MemberAt. 3 i would have take Penei. At 6 chase or the other rec from bama not devonte.
"Pennington's Limp Arm wrote:Interseting note...
they currently sit at 10.
Would you swap #6 for #10 and #44? That takes Pitts and Chase off the board. They’d probably still have a shot at Smith or Waddle. I would then take Harris at #18, then go DE,LB and C in round 2(depending on who’s available, of course).
Dol-Fan Dupreeforum_veteran"Fishhead wrote:
Would you swap #6 for #10 and #44? That takes Pitts and Chase off the board. They’d probably still have a shot at Smith or Waddle. I would then take Harris at #18, then go DE,LB and C in round 2(depending on who’s available, of course).
I would. That 44 could make sure Miami takes a C or RB or LB.
Holland is a huge upgrade over McCain
I want to be alive, I am alive! Alive, I tell you! Mother, I love you, those are no longer just words. I want to hold you, I want to run in a stream, I want to taste ice cream but not just put it in my mouth and let it slide down my throat but really eat it. - Robot Morty
Rick 1966forum_veteran"Fishhead wrote:
Would you swap #6 for #10 and #44?
No. I'd only swap 6 for 10, 44, and their first rounder next year.
mlb1399forum_veteran"Fishhead wrote:
Would you swap #6 for #10 and #44? That takes Pitts and Chase off the board. They’d probably still have a shot at Smith or Waddle. I would then take Harris at #18, then go DE,LB and C in round 2(depending on who’s available, of course).
It depends who’s off the board at 6. The trade value chart says we’d be ahead but I think you adjust the value of the #6 value if Chase or Pitts is there. The other risk is Smith is likely off the board at 10 too.
I’d need 10, 44 and 2022 2nd if Pitts or Chase is available. Maybe a little more.
Pennington's Limp Armforum_veteran"Fishhead wrote:
Would you swap #6 for #10 and #44? That takes Pitts and Chase off the board. They’d probably still have a shot at Smith or Waddle. I would then take Harris at #18, then go DE,LB and C in round 2(depending on who’s available, of course).
Absolutely not. There will be a hall of famer on the board at 6.
You draft that guy. Super bowl teams have superstar players.
Unless our scouts/evaluators are not confident in their own ability to grade these prospects and are not pounding the table on specific names. Then you trade back and hope for luck of the draw. (I hope this isn’t the case)
"mlb1399 wrote:
It depends who’s off the board at 6. The trade value chart says we’d be ahead but I think you adjust the value of the #6 value if Chase or Pitts is there. The other risk is Smith is likely off the board at 10 too.
I’d need 10, 44 and 2022 2nd if Pitts or Chase is available. Maybe a little more.
If Jerry is that “obsessed” with Pitts, maybe they do add a 2022 second rounder to sweeten the deal. That might be tough to resist. It also depends on what Atlanta and Cincy do at #4 and #5.
Unlucky 13subscriber"Fishhead wrote:
Would you swap #6 for #10 and #44? That takes Pitts and Chase off the board. They’d probably still have a shot at Smith or Waddle. I would then take Harris at #18, then go DE,LB and C in round 2(depending on who’s available, of course).
If Pitts and Chase are both gone by the time #6 is on the board, then yes, I'd make that trade. If either are still there, I'm taking them.
texanphinaticforum_veteranThat would be such a Jerry and Cowboys move lol, what a disaster of a team that would be. No defense, OL falling apart, QB coming back from major injury ... let's trade up for a TE when we have Amari and literally just took a first round WR last year.
Way to many eggs in the basket.
As for the proposed trade of 6 for 10 and 44 ... meh, no thanks. We would essentially have given up our first rounder next year for a second rounder this year while also losing 4 spots in the first round this year. We did not trade up to 6 just to take a deal like that.
Grier and Flores clearly have at least one, maybe 2 guys who they really want and are sure will be there at 6. Unless we get a borderline absurd deal, we are staying and picking.
Galantforum_veteran
"Although we are capable of great acts of kindness, history teaches us that we sometimes need saving from ourselves – from our recklessness or our greed. God sent into the world a unique person – neither a philosopher nor a general, important though they are, but a Saviour, with the power to forgive... It is my prayer that on this Christmas day we might all find room in our lives for the message of the angels and for the love of God through Christ our Lord." (Christmas message, 2011)
mlb1399forum_veteran"Fishhead wrote:
If Jerry is that “obsessed” with Pitts, maybe they do add a 2022 second rounder to sweeten the deal. That might be tough to resist. It also depends on what Atlanta and Cincy do at #4 and #5.
I go back and forth on whether that would be enough for Chase or Pitts. Pitts is a generational talent and Chase seems like the next Deandre Hopkins.
The way I look at it is it I had Kelce or Hopkins on my team, what would it take to trade them? I think 2 1st round picks. Clearly there’s an unknown there because they are unproven but they both look like they could be that good.
Phinz13forum_veteran"mlb1399 wrote:
I go back and forth on whether that would be enough for Chase or Pitts. Pitts is a generational talent and Chase seems like the next Deandre Hopkins.
The way I look at it is it I had Kelce or Hopkins on my team, what would it take to trade them? I think 2 1st round picks. Clearly there’s an unknown there because they are unproven but they both look like they could be that good.
I would say this deal gets serious consideration if Chase and Pitts get drafted by #6. Otherwise, I can’t see it happening, unless Dallas makes a ridiculous offer.
The G Manforum_veteranSeems Sewell's stock may be dropping a bit (Slater starting to get some love for OT#1 in this draft).
The trade with Philly starting to make a little more sense to me. With QB's pretty much a lock to go #1, #2 & #3 (and maybe #4 too), the Dolphins are in a sweet spot for a blue chip player at #6. Pitts, Chase, Sewell, Slater. Kinda hard to go wrong IMO.
http://larrycsonka.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/071511-NFL-Larry-Csonka-PI_2011071516291173_660_320.jpg
Dorfdadforum_veteranI don’t believe pits will be there at six and I think he’s a generational talent imagine having to dominate Tight ends like New England did. No way to stop that offense and they have super bowls to prove it.
we should have kept third pick and grabbed him. Not so sure he will make it to six I believe he’s top 5
JJ_79forum_veteran"Dorfdad wrote:
we should have kept third pick and grabbed him. Not so sure he will make it to six I believe he’s top 5
As much as I love Pitts and I also don’t think he will be there, a little early for such conclusions, don’t you think?
TheHighExhaultedforum_veteranSaw a mock having them take Slater at 6. Please no.
Strikingforum_veteran"Fishhead wrote:
Would you swap #6 for #10 and #44? That takes Pitts and Chase off the board. They’d probably still have a shot at Smith or Waddle. I would then take Harris at #18, then go DE,LB and C in round 2(depending on who’s available, of course).
Yes
texanphinaticforum_veteran"TheHighExhaulted wrote:
Saw a mock having them take Slater at 6. Please no.
Aside from literally any defender, this would be the one move that would really get my dander up.
I like Pitts and Chase over Smith, but I can justify it and be excited. I'd be a little more iffy on Waddle though
Dorfdadforum_veteran"JJ_79 wrote:
As much as I love Pitts and I also don’t think he will be there, a little early for such conclusions, don’t you think?
It’s preseason and I’m always a doubter during these times :)
JJ_79forum_veteran"Dorfdad wrote:
It’s preseason and I’m always a doubter during these times :)
Understandable with the history we got the last 20 + years. Unsure myself but Flores and Grier injected a little confidence, this feels a lot different from what we had to endure since Wannstache took over.
ExplosionsInDaSkyforum_veteran"TUAtionsEnd wrote:
At. 3 i would have take Penei. At 6 chase or the other rec from bama not devonte.
Same, and there's a part of me that really wants Sewell to still be there at six so that we can take him and solidify our O Line once and for all. Either way, I feel like the pick will be used on a player that "insulates" Tua. Be it another lineman, or WR.
Unlucky 13subscriber"JJ_79 wrote:
Understandable with the history we got the last 20 + years. Unsure myself but Flores and Grier injected a little confidence, this feels a lot different from what we had to endure since Wannstache took over.
For me, it feels a lot like the start of the Sparano era. Getting the team to play low mistake football, few penalties and turnovers, tight special teams, making plays when they need to on defense, and trying to turn chicken :censored: into chicken salad on offense. That's fine. Its a solid foundation. But now we need to be able to take the next step from there and actually build a team that can win 10+ games without every ball bouncing our way. We'll find out soon enough.
JJ_79forum_veteran"Unlucky 13 wrote:
For me, it feels a lot like the start of the Sparano era. Getting the team to play low mistake football, few penalties and turnovers, tight special teams, making plays when they need to on defense, and trying to turn chicken :censored: into chicken salad on offense. That's fine. Its a solid foundation. But now we need to be able to take the next step from there and actually build a team that can win 10+ games without every ball bouncing our way. We'll find out soon enough.
Nah, with Sparano it was the wildcat and Pennington. Flores impressed me now for 2 seasons, that’s something new and something that no coach has ever done with Shula and Jimmy you knew what you had. What’s new too, is how we handle free agency, like what we‘re doing there since Grier took over. This is definitely different, hope we get different results now too!
Log in to reply.