1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The Consequences of that Vernon Call (Analysis)

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by Section126, Oct 28, 2013.

  1. Section126

    Section126 We are better than you. Luxury Box

    47,525
    72,483
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Miami, Florida
    All of these numbers were compiled from the start of the 2004 NFL Season till the End of the 2012 Season.

    All the Offensive Probabilities for the Patriots are calculated and weighted for a League Average Defense as the Opposition.

    Time and Situation: NE 20 MIA 17, MIA 23, 2nd and 7 NE Ball. 9:10 Left (4th Quarter)

    Win Probability: PATRIOTS 56.14%

    Probable Poss. Left: Miami 2.7 Patriots 1.8

    Resulting Play Situation: NE 20 MIA 17, MIA 23, 3rd and 29 NE Ball. 8:58 Left (clock running) (4th Quarter)

    Win Probability: PATRIOTS 53.74%

    Chance of conversion of a 3rd and 29: 1.12%
    Probability of POINTS on Current Drive: 23.22% (TD: 0.34% FG: 94.55%)

    Result of play: PENALTY, 10 Yards, Ball Placed MIA 13, 1st and 10. 8:58 4th Q

    Win Probability: PATRIOTS 72.14%

    Probable Poss. Left: Miami 2.1 Patriots 1.4

    Probability of POINTS on Current Drive: 83.22% (TD: 64.55% FG: 34.25%)

    Win Probability if score is 23-17 NE with 7:14 Left: PATRIOTS 81.65%
    Win Probability if score is 27-17 NE with 7:14 Left: PATRIOTS 93.10%

    MIAMI Win Probability if Penalty is Not Called: 45.44%
    MIAMI Win Probability after Penalty is Called: 22.25%


    Yeah...Safe to say that Call was pretty Big.
     
  2. vt_dolfan

    vt_dolfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    Kinda hard to argue that....but..Im sure someone will take a stab at it.

    Love to see the odds if you throw in the other two blatantly wrong calls.
     
    DPlus47 likes this.
  3. DePhinistr8

    DePhinistr8 Season Ticket Holder

    3,123
    2,247
    113
    Mar 24, 2008
    I was told there would be no math!
     
    BuffaloDolphin, DPlus47, Bpk and 5 others like this.

  4. :lol:
     
    djphinfan likes this.
  5. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    I don't see that it's hard to argue against that at all.

    The entire analysis is predicated on the time left in the ball game.

    Let's say you're losing a game 27-21 with 1 minute left. You've gotten to a 3rd & Goal on the opposition's 1-yard line. The percentages probably say you have something like a 70 percent chance of winning (just guessing).

    You run the football. You lose a yard because your tailback tripped.

    Now your percentages say you only have a 30 to 40 percent chance of winning (again, just guessing).

    So your chances of victory went down from 70 percent to 30 to 40 percent based on the one play, the one shoelace trip, the one yard you lost instead of gained.

    Did that play lose you the football game?

    Or did the 140 other plays in the game where you could have done something better that would have resulted in a better outcome lose you the football game?

    Let's say the EXACT SAME THING happened to you earlier in the game, in the first quarter. You're 3rd & Goal from the 1-yard line. You lose a yard. Simply because it was the first quarter and not the fourth quarter, the change in your win probability model was likely negligible.

    Yet in reality, the screwup likely cost you a touchdown all the same.

    That's the major fallacy in this style of analysis.
     
    DevilFin13 likes this.
  6. JShady

    JShady Miami Heat lover

    2,134
    546
    113
    Sep 8, 2013
    Will that ref be fired? He deserves to work for McDonalds.
     
  7. schmolioot

    schmolioot Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    26,254
    17,386
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    Orlando
    Is anyone, CK included, arguing that the fumble wasn't a big play?

    I think everyone agrees it was a big play. The argument is whether it was a conspiracy type call or not. Based on the rule as written, it was probably the right call. That doesn't make the rule or the penalty associated with it any less horrible, but there isn't anything we can do about it
     
  8. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,415
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    Not only big but the wrong call too Section....Sad part about it is watching it we were saying "The bailout is coming at some point in this game"...

    It is Foxboro, it always does come...
     
    DPlus47, DOLPHAN1, xphinfanx and 3 others like this.
  9. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    How quickly people forget that a week ago the Patriots lost a game in overtime based on a penalty that had quite literally never been called in the NFL before that final long field goal the Jets attempted (and missed) in overtime.

    Guess someone forgot to request a bailout for that game.
     
  10. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,415
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    You cant prove definitively that OV wasnt trying to possess that ball....

    Ask yourself.....I did....

    "Was he trying to tap that ball backwards?" And I answered "yeah I can see that"

    then ask.....

    "Was he trying to possess the football?" And I answered "yeah I can see that"
     
  11. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,415
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    It was made up to them yesterday.....
     
    DPlus47, SICK, Larry Little and 2 others like this.
  12. slickj101

    slickj101 Is Water

    15,886
    8,901
    113
    Dec 21, 2007
    NY
    Forget about it? I think most people look at that and now see why they got the calls that they did yesterday.
     
    MrClean, SICK, Larry Little and 3 others like this.
  13. Section126

    Section126 We are better than you. Luxury Box

    47,525
    72,483
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Miami, Florida
    The problem comes in that this drastic of a change in Win Prob. hardly Ever comes from anything other than a Touchdown, or Turnover.

    It does come at times from Pass Interference....which is the ultimate rigging call.

    I'm not saying it was rigged...just saying that if the rolls were reversed...Tannehill would be trying to convert 3rd and 29.
     
  14. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    I have a pretty strong feeling that if the call had gone against the Patriots right now there would be an entire wagon load of people defending it as the Patriots player clearly trying to bat the football away from a Dolphins offensive player who was trying to recover it.
     
    Puka-head, Bpk and Phinfanjt like this.
  15. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    The end result of what you're saying is that no play matters.
     
    finyank13 likes this.
  16. He also had someone on top of him pushing him down and stopping his momentum going forward which easily explains why his grab for the ball came up short and resulted in the ball being unintentionally advanced
     
    finyank13 likes this.
  17. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Or just gaining enough yards to kick a long field goal, which means Miami would have to punch the ball into the end zone to win the game. That would the same offense that in the previous two games found themselves at midfield needing 15 to 20 yards just to give their kicker a chance at winning the game with a FIELD GOAL, now needing a go-ahead touchdown in order to not lose the game.

    Suffice it to say, I think there are several things the math model doesn't necessarily take account of.
     
  18. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,415
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    I wouldn't, I call it as I see it.....I would without a doubt be happy Miami got over as I am sure the Pats fans are...but I would say it was the right or wrong call....
     
  19. slickj101

    slickj101 Is Water

    15,886
    8,901
    113
    Dec 21, 2007
    NY
    Seeing as there was nothing clear about the play I have a feeling that most people will call bull**** on that.
     
    DPlus47 likes this.
  20. Section126

    Section126 We are better than you. Luxury Box

    47,525
    72,483
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Miami, Florida
    If you believe what you are saying CK..then your argument today should be that Olivier Vernon most likely Blew that game yesterday with his "dumb" penalty.

    It was as consequential a penalty as I have seen in quite some time.
     
    Bumrush, DOLPHAN1, Sceeto and 5 others like this.
  21. jdang307

    jdang307 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    39,159
    21,798
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    San Diego
    Or that no single play matters on it's own. It's the culmination of it.

    I think the worst call was the one upstairs. To abandon the run in the 2nd half.
     
    SICK likes this.
  22. Section126

    Section126 We are better than you. Luxury Box

    47,525
    72,483
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Miami, Florida
    and I showed you how the chances of ANY points are drastically decreased after that 3rd and 29.
     
  23. byroan

    byroan Giggity Staff Member Administrator Luxury Box

    27,269
    44,474
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    NC
    Based on the way it's written, it's still a bad call.

    You can't say it was intentional when the ball was out of reach and he was trying to grab it.
     
    DPlus47, DOLPHAN1, MrClean and 4 others like this.
  24. Stringer Bell

    Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
  25. schmolioot

    schmolioot Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    26,254
    17,386
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    Orlando
    I agree with you, which is exactly why the call should be reviewable and the penalty structure for a violation of the rule should be changed. but given what the Ref saw in real time I can understand the call, even if I don't agree with it
     
    dolfan22, shula_guy and finyank13 like this.
  26. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    I believe Olivier Vernon committed a costly penalty. That is true. It was dumb, on his part.

    Your models overstate the costliness of the result of plays because they're predicated on the time left in the game. Blown plays early in a game can impact the game just as much as blown plays late. Sometimes, even more so.

    The Dolphins did not lose the game based on a penalty. The offense failed to score a single point in the second half of the game. There's no mention of that in all this complaining about the officiating. There's no mention of the fact that the Patriots gained 72 non-penalty yards on that 82 yard touchdown drive. There's no mention any number of things that could easily have won Miami the game. Everything is just focued on the officiating.

    And I think that's pretty weak.
     
  27. Disgustipate

    Disgustipate Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    31,608
    55,630
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    It wasn't the entire game, but it was a huge call, and the third bad call of the game.

    If the call stands, they get 3, or even no points instead of 7.
     
    DPlus47 and maynard like this.
  28. Section126

    Section126 We are better than you. Luxury Box

    47,525
    72,483
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Miami, Florida
    That is called a ****ty win Prob from Pro-Football Ref. that is not weighted for specific teams vs. specific opponents, and down and distance.

    Mine is the one that costs TV Stations about $250 a month in Subscription fees.
     
    MrClean likes this.
  29. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    Except that isn't true.

    One play can be the only TD in a 7-0 game. This is an absurd argument. The game plays out the way the game plays out. No team plays a game perfectly or completely ineptly. Teams rarely blow out other teams and most games are close and are decided by by a handful of plays. That's the norm and its all well and good. The Buffalo game was lost by our players. There were a few plays that can easily be pointed to (like the Tannehill fumble in the end) that changed the probable outcome of the game.

    Again, this all well and valid. The problem comes when the refs are the reason for those plays and they were numerous times yesterday. To say otherwise is either false bravado or agenda driven rhetoric.
     
    Puka-head and DPlus47 like this.
  30. slickj101

    slickj101 Is Water

    15,886
    8,901
    113
    Dec 21, 2007
    NY
    Sure you can, if you completely ignore the actual rule and use your imagination to blame OV.
     
    DPlus47, DOLPHAN1, Firesole and 3 others like this.
  31. maynard

    maynard Who, whom?

    18,425
    6,346
    113
    Dec 5, 2007
    clearwater, fl
    The fact this statement above is even up for debate is arguably worse than the call itself
     
  32. jdang307

    jdang307 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    39,159
    21,798
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    San Diego
    The only argument that is absurd is yours.

    So the previous and subsequent 40-50 offensive plays that led to 3 and outs, punts and turnovers don't matter? See how that works. Lose 7-0 and you want to focus on that one touchdown, and not the offensive futility of the losing team for 60 minutes. Some plays are more significant than others. But it's never one play.
     
    DevilFin13 likes this.
  33. Section126

    Section126 We are better than you. Luxury Box

    47,525
    72,483
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Miami, Florida
    Again..I have plenty of complaints.

    My Main one being that Bryant McKinnie was....COMPETENT! Meaning that Ireland might have screwed up by not signing him in the offseason. (we might have 1 more win?...maybe 2? maybe?)

    BUT.

    This call was IMO a premature ending to that football game, and an interesting reward for getting sack/fumbled.
     
    DOLPHAN1, Sceeto, Paul 13 and 4 others like this.
  34. Section126

    Section126 We are better than you. Luxury Box

    47,525
    72,483
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Miami, Florida
    Example....from Basketball.

    You turn it over 25 times. No chance of winning right?

    Except that you actually do have a chance with 10 seconds left. You take a shot....to tie the game..it gets goaltended..and no call is made.

    You can complain about that call, and it not fair for anybody to come back with..."Well..you turned it over 25 times..you didn't deserve to win that game..."

    well, NO..that ONE CALL/NO CALL was consequential. It matters.
     
    maynard likes this.
  35. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,415
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    I think it even took them out of FG range no?
     
    Puka-head likes this.
  36. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    Your ridiculous argument only exists in a world where perfect play is the norm...and its not the norm.

    It is impossible for one team to be perfect on every play. That's the end result you're arguing for. Every offensive play must go for a TD or you can't blame any given play or plays on why you lost. That is the very definition of absurd.

    Since its not possible, your argument is not valid.
     
  37. Section126

    Section126 We are better than you. Luxury Box

    47,525
    72,483
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Miami, Florida
    Yes.
     
    finyank13 likes this.
  38. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    It mattered. The turnovers that led up to it also matter.

    Also, it's dicey to compare a 100-possession sport to a 12-possession sport. In a 100-possession sport, early mistakes don't matter as much. You're going to get 80 more possessions to rectify the mistake. In a 12-possession sport, early mistakes matter. Late mistakes matter. All mistakes matter. The mistakes that happen toward the end matter, probably a little bit more than the ones that happened early, but not a whole lot more. Not like in basketball.
     
  39. maynard

    maynard Who, whom?

    18,425
    6,346
    113
    Dec 5, 2007
    clearwater, fl
    I have a bad habit of deleting games after a loss. Where was the ball recovered?
     
  40. jdang307

    jdang307 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    39,159
    21,798
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    San Diego
    You are miles away from the original argument. But that's par for your course.

    Nobody has even talked about being perfect. We're talking about plays that matter. And last I checked, you gotta play all 6o minutes.
     

Share This Page