1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sports Buzz ...Starks contract...other tidbits

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by CrunchTime, Jan 13, 2013.

  1. CrunchTime

    CrunchTime Administrator Retired Administrator

    23,327
    35,934
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    The Dolphins have opened talks with defensive tackle Randy Starks and made clear they want to sign him. But the sides aren’t close on financial terms. Some had speculated that Miami might prefer to move Jared Odrick to tackle and draft or sign a starting defensive end. But that would become a possibility only if Miami is unable to sign Starks.


    He tailed off at the end of the season but he was part of the wall in the center of the DL and I hope we re sign him without breaking the bank.:yes:

     
    Ducken, MrClean, cuchulainn and 2 others like this.
  2. shouright

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    This "sides aren't close" thing is going to become fairly prevalant IMO, as players and their agents determine players' value by the supply and demand dynamics of the free agent market, while the Dolphins determine their value based on their performance.
     
  3. Fin-Omenal

    Fin-Omenal Initiated

    36,936
    10,264
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Thee...Ohio State University
    If we could move Odrick back to DT and lure a Kruger or Michael Johnson I would be ok with letting Starks go.
     
  4. CrunchTime

    CrunchTime Administrator Retired Administrator

    23,327
    35,934
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    There usually is a lot of posturing during the early stages of negotiations.
     
  5. Rhody Phins Fan

    Rhody Phins Fan Well-Known Member

    4,348
    1,436
    113
    Jan 14, 2009
    On Rotoworld yesterday, it was said that Kruger would be looking for eight million a year. Might be too pricy for Miami's taste.
     
  6. emocomputerjock

    emocomputerjock Senior Member

    5,649
    1,853
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    DC
    Didn't Starks have a death in the family last year that he was dealing with? That may have had something to do with it.
     
    Perfectville_USA likes this.
  7. Fin-Omenal

    Fin-Omenal Initiated

    36,936
    10,264
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Thee...Ohio State University
    He has some leverage in Baltimore for sure. They are losing defensive talent and what they have for the most part is aging.
     
  8. FinNasty

    FinNasty Alabama don’t want this... Staff Member Club Member

    24,273
    36,114
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Negotiations usually never start close. The player will be high and the team will be low.
     
  9. Perfectville_USA

    Perfectville_USA Mr Perfect

    607
    302
    0
    Dec 27, 2012
    Syracuse NY
    A lot of NFL teams do not have a lot of cap room. Five teams have 60% of all the current cap room for all 32 NFL teams. Some of these NFL players are going to in for a real suprise this offseason with there FA.
     
  10. rafael

    rafael Well-Known Member

    27,364
    31,261
    113
    Apr 6, 2008
    Kruger was my first choice in the second round of the draft the year he came out. That was the year we took Pat White something like 10 picks before Kruger. :pity:
     
  11. Perfectville_USA

    Perfectville_USA Mr Perfect

    607
    302
    0
    Dec 27, 2012
    Syracuse NY
    Please do not get me started on the Pat White pick!
     
    Larry Little likes this.
  12. Disgustipate

    Disgustipate Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    31,633
    55,691
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    I think Randy Starks might be a difficult re-sign. He's close enough to elite to ask for big money with the inherent inflation of free agency, but outside of 2009 he's generally been just pretty good. At this point I think moving Odrick and looking for a replacement at end is more cost effective.

    Paul Kruger probably isn't a fit to play Odrick's position. You can improve how much edge rush you get at the position, but you're almost certainly looking for a 280+ pound player. A guy like Carlos Dunlap.
     
  13. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    Interesting comment, Fin-O... because i just did an exercise to see who I would have drafted if I were the GM since 2008 (based on the 'want' lists I had for each round at the times of those drafts)... and Kruger and Johnson would already be on our team. lol.
     
    Fin-Omenal likes this.
  14. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    Me too, Rafael.

    If you have time, it's a very interesting exercise to go back to the pre-2008 roster, then play GM through every draft and Free Agency to today and see what roster you would have had compared to Irelands.
     
  15. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Which has nothing to do with performance?
     
  16. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    His mother died I believe and he missed a lot of practice time because of it.

    Yeah I'm sure it had an effect on some of his games. I thought he was overall good to very good for the year though.
     
  17. Stringer Bell

    Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    It has a lot to do with performance, but its also apparent that the FA market isn't necessarily an efficient one. Teams are at a major disadvantage when signing other teams' free agents.
     
  18. unluckyluciano

    unluckyluciano For My Hero JetsSuck

    53,333
    23,006
    0
    Dec 7, 2007
    plus I imagine the dolphins are initially low balling the players value. I can't see them starting at what they actually think they are worth.
     
  19. Jaj

    Jaj Registered

    6,359
    1,671
    0
    Mar 23, 2008
    Los Angeles
    Seems pretty obvious that Kruger-Odrick would be a stronger defensive line than Odrick-Starks. You're looking at an all-around defensive end, a good fit at three technique inside, a nose tackle, an another all-around DE (Kruger, Odrick, Soliai, Wake).
     
  20. RoninFin4

    RoninFin4 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    23,719
    44,844
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    I'm glad Miami wants to bring back Starks. I still wonder with how Coyle started using Olivier Vernon throughout the year if the defense doesn't incorporate more of a hybrid look next season.
     
  21. Fin-Omenal

    Fin-Omenal Initiated

    36,936
    10,264
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Thee...Ohio State University

    BPK > Ireland.
     
  22. Sceeto

    Sceeto Well-Known Member

    13,514
    6,263
    113
    Oct 13, 2008
    New York
    I would definitely try to resign Starks. The guy has been real solid since he's been here and he was very good this year as well. Some say that his play fell off later in the season, but he was a playing a bit gimpy at that time because he got dinged up in one game. He was a big part of our dominant run D. He gives us a lot of flexibility and good depth, especially when someone else on the Dline gets hurt. He's not old. I wouldn't like to start messing with one of the stronger parts of the team. Definitely hope they resign him.
     
  23. Fin-Omenal

    Fin-Omenal Initiated

    36,936
    10,264
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Thee...Ohio State University

    It's all about price IMO, with Odrick at DE it made it very hard to run against us. But that's not an ideal DL against a Tom Brady for example.
     
    Boik14 likes this.
  24. Rocky Raccoon

    Rocky Raccoon Greasepaint Ghost Staff Member

    30,224
    36,965
    113
    Dec 2, 2007
    Jersey
    Starks has been excellent since we signed him and he is now entering his prime. I understand Odrick is better inside but you have got to re-sign him if possible. The more talent you have on D-line the better.
     
    Sceeto, Boik14 and ToddPhin like this.
  25. Mcduffie81

    Mcduffie81 Wildcat Club Member

    6,057
    5,621
    113
    Mar 23, 2008
    Lake Worth, Fl.
    I dont get it. Re-signing Starks seems like a luxury we can't afford. I'll do what I always do....hope they have a solid plan.
     
  26. RoninFin4

    RoninFin4 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    23,719
    44,844
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    I think that Miami's going to have to realize that if they want to play with the over-sized DE, they're going to have to get someone at OLB who can rush the pass-rusher opposite Wake. That's not Koa Misi, and Olivier Vernon is still developing. Maybe they try and sign Antwan Barnes or draft someone like a Dion Jordan or Alex Okafor that can play that position. Maybe it's not a 3-down defensive player right off the bat, but someone that can eventually be groomed to be a 3-down player.
     
  27. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    I wanted Barwin in the 1st round, would have been thrilled with him at the White pick, but Kruger was a solid 1a by that point.
     
  28. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    Starks should get about the same as the Rams gave Langford last year. I think we could afford that.
     
  29. PhinsRDbest

    PhinsRDbest Transform and Transcend

    8,365
    4,211
    113
    Jan 5, 2010
    the next dimension
    I think they are coming to the realization that Hartline and Smith are going to be a lot harder to re-sign than initially thought. Thus you see them moving on to Starks and even starting talks to extend Jones.
     
  30. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    If it were up to me, resigning Starks and extending Jones would be priorities more than resigning Hartline or Smith anyway.
     
    PhinsRDbest likes this.
  31. Rocky Raccoon

    Rocky Raccoon Greasepaint Ghost Staff Member

    30,224
    36,965
    113
    Dec 2, 2007
    Jersey
    Agreed.

    I like Hartline but I'm starting to think they let him walk. Sign Wallace/Jennings and draft another receiver high.

    Wallace/Jennings
    Bess
    High draft pick
    Matthews.

    That looks good to me.

    I'm willing to let Smith walk at this point as well. He's not worth the price he wants and while I don't think he sucks he certainly isn't irreplaceable and often plays too soft for my liking.

    Then I'd definitely re-sign Starks and I'm still willing to re-sign Bush because the guy is a playmaker.
     
    MrClean likes this.
  32. unifiedtheory

    unifiedtheory Sub Pending Luxury Box

    12,363
    7,091
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    Burnaby, BC, Canada
    I'm going to try and not sound like a dick but...

    We are making a strong push to sign Randy Starks (who plays a position we have depth at AND have a ready made replacement in Jared Odrick) but we are lowballing Sean Smith and Brian Hartline, who start at positions we have ZERO depth at?

    This organization confuses me....all the ****ing time.
     
    Mcduffie81 likes this.
  33. slickj101

    slickj101 Is Water

    15,886
    8,901
    113
    Dec 21, 2007
    NY
    Quality over quantity.
     
    dolfan22 likes this.
  34. unifiedtheory

    unifiedtheory Sub Pending Luxury Box

    12,363
    7,091
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    Burnaby, BC, Canada
    Both those players have leverage, lots of it. They know that they are need players at super thin positions. they essentially have us by the balls because of Ireland's roster mismanagement.

    I think Ireland is under valuing them and it is going to kick us in the teeth. I do look forward to walk into the draft knowing we MUST draft a receiver and a corner very early, maybe even two at each position, forsaking the other major needs on the roster.
     
  35. unifiedtheory

    unifiedtheory Sub Pending Luxury Box

    12,363
    7,091
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    Burnaby, BC, Canada
    Depth is important.

    If Brian Hartline walks our #1 receiver is a #3 slot receiver and our #2 is Rashad Mathews.

    If Sean Smith walks our starting corners are two guys who were not on the roster in November.

    Jeff Ireland....genius.
     
  36. slickj101

    slickj101 Is Water

    15,886
    8,901
    113
    Dec 21, 2007
    NY
    Citing starting rosters in January... genius.
     
    GMJohnson likes this.
  37. unifiedtheory

    unifiedtheory Sub Pending Luxury Box

    12,363
    7,091
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    Burnaby, BC, Canada
    IF you let Hartline walk you are moving sideways, not forward. If you sign Hartline and sign Jennings/Wallace/Bowe to go with Hartline and Bess then you are moving forward and giving yourself a ton of flexibility on draft day.

    Smith walking means you MUST draft a corner and do it early just to replace Sean Smith. Then you still need another corner either in free agency or the draft.
     
  38. unifiedtheory

    unifiedtheory Sub Pending Luxury Box

    12,363
    7,091
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    Burnaby, BC, Canada
    Just stating fact.

    Letting Hartline and Sean Smith walk is ridiculous roster management. You are creating holes that must be filled at positions you already have holes. Our cap space is over blown, we will not be able to fill all these holes in free agency and opening them up means we are pinned down on draft day by needs instead of wants. That is how you draft poorly.

    Seriously, can Ireland do no wrong in your eyes?
     
  39. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    How do you force people to take a deal that fits our cap? Is it better to overpay for good players or create holes and fill them with average players?
     
  40. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    If the plan is to keep Odrick at DE, then losing Starks would cut into our depth quite a lot. McDaniel probably won't be resigned, unless he is willing to take a lesser deal to stay in Miami, which is what some of us thought he did last time. So maybe he returns at below market value.
    We'll probably address CB in those first 5 picks anyway and likely the first 3 picks. Let's say we went into next season with Marshall, Patterson, Carroll, McCann, Wilson and a 2nd round corner. That wouldn't be so bad.
    I think we'll keep Hartline, JMO, and still sign a Greg Jennings type of receiver. If it does become an either/or situation, where it's one or the other, then this draft looks like a nice group of WRs we could pick from in the 2nd round.
    If Smith will take a contract commensurate with what #2 corners are getting, then IMO we will keep him too. I think CK explained a while back that #2 corners typically get a deal that averages about 6-7mil in free agency. Perhaps I am remembering wrong.
     

Share This Page