Thanks to Boom and the gang at Universal and some other sites, and sorting through both our needs and personal workouts - we 'should' be able to narrow down RD 1 choices to the following: G: Pouncey / Hudson, Rackley QB: Newton, Ponder, Mallett, Locker, and CKap RB: Ingram / LeShoure, Williams SOLB: Quinn, Smith WOLB: Miller NT: Luiget, Wilkerson We did not (to date) bring in any of the top WRs for a personal workout, neither did we bring in any of the top Ts. Of this list, i expect all 3 X LBs to be gone - along with Newton; but a QB run could change that. Quinn and Smith are wildcards .... Where we 'seem' to focused our efforts for early picks (RD1 & potentially 2): QB, RB, SOLB, G and NT .... I've said many times that i do not like these QBs in RD1, most noteably CKap - who i have been on record stating that this is the guy i like most, but have a hard time paying a high price for him. I wish Ponder was a little taller. I've also said that i wouldn't draft a RB in RD1 either - unless there was an unbelievable talent, which there isn't. One could also argue that Wilkerson or Pouncey @15 is too high. I still am convinced we will move down to the lower part of RD1, if given a partner -- and pick CKap, Ponder, Pouncey or Wilkerson ... I also believe that the lower rounds are easier to predict: 5-7 will be RB, CB/S and WR ... we've seemed to focus a lot of effort (multiple personal workouts) on later round picks in these categories. It's 2-4 that are the most cloudy: with QB (2-3), RB (2-3), OLB (2-3), G (2-4), C (4), TE (3) and NT (4) all possibilities. The biggest tease questions ... are the RD1 QB/RBs real or memorex ?? RB doesn't help us with any disinformation campaign - so that at least MUST be real. What i thought was a real possibility, but don't get that from everything being written -- is T as a potential priority. It doesn't seem likely that we'd draft a RT until later in the draft as a project -- if at all, which is surprising to me. Conventional wisdom says that we'll draft a RB in RD1, and again in RD5 ... unless we can recoup the RD2 pick, then i default back to the above -- with RB in RD2 and RD5.