That's not an explanation about how anything has changed that would make something that has repeatedly failed be successful this time. What will be the difference this time that hasn't been in place 100 times before? And BTW I'm specifically talking about #4. All the other stuff is obvious. We want good players. There are injuries and the trenches are important. But #4 (and #5 for that matter) is just a statement without any backing. You have yet to show any reason why this attempt to rotate would be more successful. If there is no backing, if you have no reason beyond wanting it to happen, that's fine. Just say that and we'll move on. But you seem to believe that you have provided something new or some reasoning why this time will be different and I've yet to hear it.
eu sou eu e minha circumstancias you've worn me down just like the rotation would wear out a defensive line should they implement it eu sou eu e minha circumstancias it is what it is: an inconsequential dolphin forum, a discussion amongst friends & much to do about nothing. you are probably right & if not, I am probably wrong. not to worry it really doesn't matter, it's only a post the end GoFish!You ever watch King of the Hill?
I wasn't trying to wear anybody down. I just wanted an answer to the question you kept dodging. You could have just said that you were being a homer rather than making a supported argument and left if at that.
you have your answers if you read my posts. ultimately, no one can convince anyone of anything they don't want to buy into. I respect your opinion. it is what it is.