***Official 2012-13 MLB HOTSTOVE OFF-SEASON THREAD***

Discussion in 'Other Sports Forum' started by BigDogsHunt, Oct 31, 2012.

  1. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,416
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    ...

     
  2. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,416
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    ...
     
  3. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Yikes.
     
    Nappy Roots likes this.
  4. Mainge

    Mainge Season Ticket Holder

    6,829
    1,449
    113
    Mar 23, 2008
    West Palm Beach
    Nice signing.
     
  5. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,416
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    If this falls through, what are the remains options for the Sox 1st basemen?? Could Papi be manning it all season!?!? that would be comical....

     
  6. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,416
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    ...
     
  7. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    No Ortiz wouldn't play 1st full time, he probably will only play it a handful of times when they play in NL parks with the right match ups.

    As far as this falling through who knows. We need to remember that it took the Sox 53 days work something out with JD Drew when they didn't like what they saw in his MRI and he turned out fine. We simply have zero idea what's wrong with Napoli, it could be something minor or major. I still think the deal will get done but the terms might be different or the Sox might just have a lot of insurance on the deal. It's nothing to worry about until there's something to worry about.

    The one thing is the Sox are at a power position with this. If Napoli walks away from the deal then there's no way he gets anything close to what the Sox are offering as teams will look at him as damaged goods. He'd probably only get a 1 year deal to prove he's healthy. In the end I think this gets worked out and maybe the 3rd year is a team/player option that vests with games played or no major injury or maybe there's an opt out clause for the team/player.

    IF the deal falls through then the Sox probably have to look to someone outside the organization via trade as I don't think you'll see them signing LaRoche. Maybe they'll sign a Carlos Lee for a year and hope for the best or go after Morneau if he's available. Something like that. The only one in their organization they could give a shot to would be Jerry Sands but I doubt they go in that route.
     
  8. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    I actually don't hate this deal for some reason and I probably should. Good gamble.
     
    finyank13 likes this.
  9. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,416
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    ...
     
  10. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,416
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    ...
     
  11. BlameItOnTheHenne

    BlameItOnTheHenne Taking a poop

    15,112
    7,311
    113
    Aug 15, 2010
    Davie
  12. LiferYank

    LiferYank New Member

    3,088
    765
    0
    Oct 1, 2012
    Swisher to the Indians for a possible 5 year deal ( vesting option).. Amazing he barely had anyone interested and yet got a possible 5th year.
     
    finyank13 likes this.
  13. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,416
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    Sucks for NY actually, Cleveland has a protected first round pick, so the Yanks get that pick at the end of the 2nd round....he wanted 18 only got 14 and thats even with Either getting his money and I think Swish is a better ballplayer than Andre.....

    Got to wonder where Bourn is going to get his money from.....I would bet the Rangers at this point..

     
  14. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    I could be wrong but with the new CBA the Yankees were always going to get a pick at the end of the 2nd round. The team no longer gets the other team's 1st round pick.

    And yes the Ethier contract looks worse and worse each day.
     
  15. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,416
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    If not protected, they would have had the compensatory pick at the end of the 1st.....that was the way BDH always explained it...
     
    BigDogsHunt likes this.
  16. BigDogsHunt

    BigDogsHunt Enough talk...prove it!

    22,422
    9,819
    0
    Nov 27, 2007
    DC Metro Area
    The new CBA rules are:


    • Teams that sign free agents who turned down qualifying offers will surrender their first round picks. However, the forfeited picks don't go to other MLB teams. Instead, the first round simply becomes condensed.
    • The first ten selections in the draft are protected. Teams with protected picks will surrender their second-highest selections. The Astros, Cubs, Rockies, Twins, Indians, Marlins, Red Sox, Royals and Blue Jays have protected first round picks this offseason. The Pirates' ninth overall selection (compensation for failing to sign their 2012 first rounder) is also protected.
    • The player’s former team will receive its compensatory selection at the end of the first round. Teams now obtain one compensatory selection, instead of two.

    So while the first 10 picks are protected, those teams still give up next best pick, but not to old team, rather just reducing the # of picks in given round. Yanks get the pick at the end of the first round if protected or not, thats the new way.
     
    CashInFist, finyank13 and Ray Finkle like this.
  17. finyank13

    finyank13 Reality Check

    30,718
    5,416
    113
    Jan 6, 2010
    ohhhh okay so the top 10 get to still pick in their respective spots but still have to compensate the pick.....

    great news actually.....the Yanks are going to have 3 picks in the top 40 I would gather or thereabouts.....man they have to hit these picks....
     
  18. BigDogsHunt

    BigDogsHunt Enough talk...prove it!

    22,422
    9,819
    0
    Nov 27, 2007
    DC Metro Area
    Right, two things to remember, even though their top10 pick is protected, they forfeit their next best pick, and they lose the money allocated for that next best pick....dropping their total pool of funds to sign draft picks. The $$$ is perhaps more of a blow than just the pick given up for signing a tendered FA, etc.

    Very interesting going forward, but Yanks end up alright with tag on for the end of the first (which is potentially reduced round). Yankees will own three of the top 35 and four of the top 65 or so picks in next June's amateur draft.

     
    CashInFist and finyank13 like this.
  19. Boik14

    Boik14 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    76,046
    39,124
    113
    Nov 28, 2007
    New York
    Because at 4 years and 56M he just bent over the indians! Guys shouldnt be getting half that. Seeing that made me happy that the Mets have no money to spend right now because thats a Mets signing if ever there was one under the previous regime.
     
    finyank13 likes this.
  20. Jt0323

    Jt0323 Fins Up! Luxury Box

    12,967
    7,293
    113
    Dec 7, 2007
    Las Vegas
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Blue Jays are the Favorite in the East

    and for those interested in the WBC
    [​IMG]
     
  21. BigDogsHunt

    BigDogsHunt Enough talk...prove it!

    22,422
    9,819
    0
    Nov 27, 2007
    DC Metro Area
    Here’s the report from FOX Sports’ Jon Morosi: The Seattle Mariners and Miami Marlins have had discussions about a trade that would send outfielder Giancarlo Stanton to Seattle, but one source told FOXSports.com that a deal appears doubtful at this point.

    Doubtful or not....shocker!
     
  22. BlameItOnTheHenne

    BlameItOnTheHenne Taking a poop

    15,112
    7,311
    113
    Aug 15, 2010
    Davie
    Felix or **** off.
     
  23. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Call me crazy but I wouldn't trade Michael Stanton for King Felix if I were the Marlins. I'd much rather have Stanton due to age, salary flexibility etc.
     
  24. Anonymous

    Anonymous Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    13,969
    3,367
    113
    Jul 5, 2009
    We wouldn't take Felix, unless our plan is to trade him after trading for him.
     
  25. Anonymous

    Anonymous Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    13,969
    3,367
    113
    Jul 5, 2009
    Quote:
    @Ken_Rosenthal: Lots of interest in #Marlins' Stanton, but sources all but rule out a deal. One source says chances are "as close to zero as they can be."
    /Twitter
     
  26. BigDogsHunt

    BigDogsHunt Enough talk...prove it!

    22,422
    9,819
    0
    Nov 27, 2007
    DC Metro Area
    The Indians announced that they've signed free agent outfielder Nick Swisher to a four-year contract w/option for 5th. The agreement covers the 2013-16 seasons and includes a vesting option for 2017.

    Swisher, an MVP Sports Group client, will earn at least $56MM before the contract expires. The $14MM vesting option in year five could boost the deal's overall value to $70MM. He'll make $11MM in 2013, $15MM for each of the 2014-16 seasons, and his $14MM 2017 option will vest if he has 550 plate appearances and passes his physical at the end of the 2016 season, reports Paul Hoynes of the Cleveland Plain Dealer (Twitter links).

     
  27. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Not a single player voted in HoF, why am I not surprised?

    I thought McGriff/Morris/Piazza probably deserved the nod, maybe Rock Raines as well, but oh no.
     
  28. BigDogsHunt

    BigDogsHunt Enough talk...prove it!

    22,422
    9,819
    0
    Nov 27, 2007
    DC Metro Area
    ZERO concern or issues from my perspective....just a point in time. So be it!
     
  29. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    It's an embarrassment that no one was elected to the HOF this year. This has nothing to do with anything but the majority of writers wanting attention by saying they filled out a blank ballot.

    But really you think McGriff and Morris deserve a nod? Piazza and Raines absolutely but neither McGriff or Morris is even close.
     
    Anonymous likes this.
  30. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    So you wouldn't have an issue if let's say Greg Maddux, Randy Johnson, Derek Jeter and/or Mariano Rivera didn't get in? Guilty by association right?
     
  31. Anonymous

    Anonymous Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    13,969
    3,367
    113
    Jul 5, 2009
    The fact that Bonds didn't get it in is an embarrassment. What a bunch of idiots.
     
  32. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Yes I do, if the steroid era tainted Raf P and McGwire etc, that makes him the best 1st basemen of the era.

    "If" what they did, does not count, then move McGriff up the list, they seem to be trying to have it both ways.

    Morris as well, I know you don't like that choice, I however do.
     
  33. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Jeff Bagwell was a much better player than McGwire, McGriff and Palmeiro too. The fact he's not in is a joke too. And even IF McGriff was the 3rd best 1B of that era, that doesn't automatically mean he should be in. Just because someone thinks using PEDs is automatically disqualifying them from the HOF it doesn't mean we should let the next best guy in, especially if the numbers just aren't there.

    Make a case for Morris being in the HOF. He doesn't have the numbers and IF he gets in he would have the highest ERA of any pitcher in the HOF. He never won a Cy Young award, only got I believe 4 1st place Cy Young votes. He was a good pitcher, not a great one. One game doesn't make you a HOFer.
     
  34. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Don't forget Clemens too.
     
    Anonymous likes this.
  35. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Thing with that is Bagwell is under the same PED cloud.

    With those 3 off of the board, McGriff then becomes the next guy up so to speak, and he is HoF worthy.

    Heh, b/c Morris literally was a miserable, moody, bastid, sports writers of that era despised him.
     
  36. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Well except the fact that McGriff wasn't better than Frank Thomas so that bumps him down to at least the 4th best 1B, which is debatable as well. But again the witch hunt for Bagwell is wrong as his name was never mentioned in any PED reports or rumors. Again guilty by association. Still though I don't understand the logic of voting McGriff in as his numbers simply aren't good enough. He was a really good player for a long time but this is the HOF we're talking about here.

    So it's because Morris was miserable and moody that he's never won a major award? Which years did he get robbed out of the Cy Young or MVP voting? Again though his numbers just aren't good enough. He has a career 3.90 ERA (in the non PED era), a career 105 ERA+, 5.8 K/9? Not saying those stats are the be all or end all but just go down his stat line, it's just not good enough.

    Seriously though, I asked for reasons why he's a HOFer not excuses. Let's hear your reasons why he is one. And while you're at it let's hear your argument for McGriff too.
     
  37. BigDogsHunt

    BigDogsHunt Enough talk...prove it!

    22,422
    9,819
    0
    Nov 27, 2007
    DC Metro Area
    I never said Guilt by association or paint with single brush.....I am saying its the 8th time that no one was elected in a single year....its not the end of the world or a travesty.

    And I dont believe someone MUST be elected every year....I do not subscribe to the "Tallest Midget" of a generation mindset...never have, never will.
     
  38. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Thomas eventually switched to DH, he had bad shoulders iirc.

    morris also has 300 wins, more than Byleven, who also made it in.
     
  39. BigDogsHunt

    BigDogsHunt Enough talk...prove it!

    22,422
    9,819
    0
    Nov 27, 2007
    DC Metro Area
    I do think the ONE THING in MLB's control (owners and players union) is to agree to fully release the names of all 150 players that tested positively in the "anonymous" test (which has been leaked for select persecution) back in 2003??? (I think that was the year).....and if you are on that list you would not get voted (or be allowed on the ballot) in to HoF in my book for sure.

    If you arent on it....no longer any reason to keep you out, etc.

    Cut and dry, clean break, to move on from the "era" once and for all.
     
  40. Anonymous

    Anonymous Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    13,969
    3,367
    113
    Jul 5, 2009
    I didn't, TBH. He's a horrible player to leave out but Bonds pisses me off more. He's arguably the greatest player ever, top 3 for sure.

    He's a Hall of Famer in my book.
     

Share This Page