Yes, because all he did was put up four videos, and talk about those 4 plays. There was nothing else. There is also no evidence elsewhere that points to the deep ball only being a problem when Wallace was the target. We've simply made all that up. Also, on his Twitter page, he tweeted out a total of 25 plays, instead of the three or four in his article. He also freely admits that Tannehill missed Wallace on some wide open plays, so it's not like he's just trying to bag on Wallace or other receivers. Here, again, we're right back into the argument. One side saying that the deep ball was all Tannehill, and one side saying that while Tannehill struggled, Wallace was also a part of the problem. Surprisingly, the side that is saying that both were part of the problem are being labeled as homers, and accused of basically making stuff up. That's really odd.