Which I never stated,again ,that it was. I would like, however, just to see him roll over either way as it would bring down the "brotherhood". I agreed with your first post, which is why I don't get why you insist on following this inane debate but ok. Your assumption is based on the fact that you don't think any sort of eye witness testimony could help bolster a case. Does that make any sense to you? I'm willing to be not. You mean besides not leaving the police to have to dick around on his computer? You mean besides making a case even stronger? You mean besides all that? Or maybe telling about past operations he knows they discussed in other chat rooms maybe? And fyi, this guy they arrested turned on anonymous and attacked their network. You know the same guys working with lulz.
I'm trying to tell you that it wouldn't. I get the feeling you have no idea what an IRC log looks like.
Well, if you don't seem to grasp that the guy can't really contribute anything not contained in IRC logs, what else is there to say? Unless he's got stuff that isn't on the seized computers (very unlikely) then he's screwed, and he won't have the opportunity to take a deal. So at this point, if you understand that the guy has little to nothing to offer that hasn't already been seized, then I don't know why we're still having this discussion.
I don't understand like you have to act like I haven't posted more then that, besides the fact that its easier to argue.
And just like that, they've disbanded. http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011...c-announces-it-is-disbanding/?test=latestnews - sent from my EVO 3D -
