Johnathon banks

Discussion in 'NFL Draft Forum' started by Dade, Feb 24, 2013.

  1. Boomer

    Boomer Premium Member Luxury Box

    22,623
    50,063
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    Richard Sherman, Joe Haden, Brandon Browner, etc. None of them ran fast. People will talk Banks down now based on seven tenths of a second and ignore the game film. It's the danger of the Combine. People get weak kneed over times. Alas, history's littered with guys who ran 4.3 and didn't amount to a lick.
     
    Bpk, Marco, KB21 and 3 others like this.
  2. alen1

    alen1 New Member

    52,811
    20,365
    0
    Dec 16, 2007
    I'm glad you said this because people respect your opinion around here more than anyone else's. I was going to say it myself.
     
    mason and Boomer like this.
  3. KB21

    KB21 Almost Never Wrong Club Member

    24,029
    40,478
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    Exactly! All one has to do is put the film of him playing against Tennessee on to see him stick to Patterson and Hunter like he was glue. Patterson and Hunter combined for 4 receptions for 66 yards against Banks and Slay in this game. Their leading receiver was Zach Rogers in this game.
     
    Boomer likes this.
  4. Colmax

    Colmax Well-Known Member

    5,126
    3,241
    113
    Dec 12, 2007
    But even Mayock (whose opinion I highly respect) said he watched tape on Banks. Against Alabama, Banks was "hip to hip in the slot" with a receiver until the ball was in the air, essentially getting beat deep for a 57 yarder. Pre-combine, Mayock wondered if this was his inability to locate the ball or if he lacked the top end speed to run with the receiver? These numbers might confirm that he may not have the top end speed to keep up with those going deep. In an earlier post, I wondered if it was miscommunication on D? We could have our answer. Let's see if he dramatically improves on his Pro Day.

    As much as I am awed with one's ability to run a quick 40, I also take into consideration what I have seen from a player. These numbers do hold water (in a sense), and there is even an explanation on NFL.com of the reasoning behind the drills.

    I was willing to give Banks the benefit of my doubts, especially since he's a MS kid, but I just do not see it. I certainly could be wrong with him, and I am genuinely pulling for him. I think he was very good in college, but I see some glaring holes that could come around at the next level. I am not sure that it was coaching, either, because they have a solid staff and have had a pretty stout D up in Starkville for a while now.
     
    Bpk likes this.
  5. Colmax

    Colmax Well-Known Member

    5,126
    3,241
    113
    Dec 12, 2007
    Then we can put on this past year's Egg Bowl and watch him get burned all night by Donte Moncrief.
     
  6. CANDolphan

    CANDolphan Well-Known Member

    1,006
    546
    113
    Feb 18, 2012
    Haden was a true 4.4 guy but Boomer is exactly right. Don't have to run a 4.3x to be a shutdown CB.

    Haden ran a terrible combine simply because he was given the worst advice/sprinting coaching anyone had ever seen.
     
  7. KB21

    KB21 Almost Never Wrong Club Member

    24,029
    40,478
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    Yeah, if you want to ignore that he was playing with a knee injury, and that it was actually Nickoe Whiltey that got burned.
     
    Boomer likes this.
  8. Ludacris

    Ludacris Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    6,974
    3,564
    113
    Jan 8, 2008
    Do you think that knee injury is still bothering him?
     
    Bpk likes this.
  9. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    But is it littered with 4.6 guys who ran shuttles over 4 seconds and made a Pro Bowl at corner?

    Because we are talking about the 12th pick, and I think you're looking for a top corner, not 'just a guy' or a 'good enough to start' guy.
     
  10. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    Agree and it's why Banks is still a first rounder, but to me, I'm now concerned about him at 12... This is a guy who is not good in run support and now has other slight knocks.

    Is he a ballhawk? Absolutely. Instincts? Amazing. Body control? Fantastic.

    12th overall? Questionable.
     
  11. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    This is important to find out.
     
  12. Colmax

    Colmax Well-Known Member

    5,126
    3,241
    113
    Dec 12, 2007
    I heard. After the Tennessee game, right? He certainly did not look good after that; neither at Alabama or at A&M (or against us).

    I still have big questions about his physicality and his poor tackling technique. I understand he has a slight frame, but football is football and people play hurt/injured quite frequently; right or wrong as it may be.

    I point to Patrick Willis in college: separated shoulder, broken finger, sprained knee, sprained foot.....all in the same year.

    Willis came to play. I am not sure Banks always does.

    My point being, if Banks is considered at #12 (Willis was taken there), I need to see more.

    I would not be disappointed if he was taken in the 2nd round by Miami, but given the pressure of finding good corners, sometimes their stocks rise a little higher than "true value" given the importance of the position.

    Just curious. Play GM; what is your draft value on Banks? Early first? Late first? Early second?
     
    Bpk likes this.
  13. Ludacris

    Ludacris Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    6,974
    3,564
    113
    Jan 8, 2008
    MrClean likes this.
  14. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    107,313
    92,977
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    Orygun
    The poor 40 time, poor shuttle, and mediocre vertical isn't going to help elevate him back up to being the 2nd corner like many of us thought a month ago. I would say the odds are about 50/50 we will have the chance to pick him at 42 and depending on what we do at pick 12, should consider it. This could be reminiscent to 1997 when a poor 40 time dropped Sam Madison down to the 2nd round. Sam ran a 4.56 at the combine that year.
     
  15. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    Agree that the Pro Day hasn't allayed the combine knock, BUT Banks is so good on film I don't see him making it to our second round pick. He will go in the late teens or twenties, and rightly so. He's super-talented.
     
  16. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    107,313
    92,977
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    Orygun
    His situation is very similar to Sam Madison in 1997. I think he falls into the early 2nd.
     
    Bpk likes this.
  17. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    54,033
    33,761
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Spring, TX
    If we didn't take a CB at #12 I'd love for us to take Banks at #42. Heck, I'd like us to take him even if we took one in the 1st rd (just likely not my 1st choice). I think he's really good.
     

Share This Page