Welker is a genius at anticipation, I don't see the Welker analogy, maybe you can explain a little more as to what your saying? You want him to get his upper body turned around better, and you want him to have a more explosive first step after the catch?
And yet every #1 receiver scored more than 1 TD. Scoring is not the sole responsibility of the specialists. You cannot make the argument you're making about scoring when 1 TD from a #1 is historically bad, because if what you were saying were true, 1 TD would be more the norm. Right, but who did more with ball (which is the definition of efficiency for a WR) a guy who got 1000 yrds with 200 of it being YAC or the guy who got 1000yrds with 500 of it being YAC? Hell, in some ways YAC is the purest form of efficiency. If a WR is supposed to run a 10 yrd curl and he does and catches the ball for 10 yrds, then that WR has done the base minimum what he's supposed to do. Now if all that was the same but he also broke a tackle and got an extra 10 yrds, who was more efficient? The team calls a play expecting X number of yards, if you exceed X, you were more efficient. Right, but wasn't it pointed out there were only like 11 guys that fall into that category? Or did I misread that, which is entirely possible.
