Well we weren’t really debating Tannehill, we were just trying to find the right label to put onto his problem with sacks. The real point is that we as fans could see that it was obvious Tannehill needs a solid OL to be productive, yet “boy genius” Gase did nothing to rectify it. We were using Tannehill as an example to illustrate Gase’s deficiencies as a coach. Another example is that as fans we could see opposing teams targeting our LBs as an area of weakness in the defense, yet the boy genius only slowly came around to trying to fix the problem. In his theory of football it’s the DL and DB that is important so you can skimp on the LB. While that may be good in theory opposing teams just bullied us with TEs and RBs in the short/intermediate passing game.