Dolphins vrs Jets official game thread!!!

1355 replies

rdhstlr23rdhstlr23subscriber
Dec 1, 2013, 02:32 PM

"phintasmic wrote:

LOL, to all Tannehill haters, take a look at Geno Smith.

THAT is a bad QB. Tannehill is a HOF QB next to that bum.

Be careful what you wish for.

I'm not wishing for Geno. I'm wishing for a competent GM to select a competent QB capable of consistency.

SIsiciliansithforum_veteran
Dec 1, 2013, 02:32 PM

"padre31 wrote:

Being a Dolphins fan is a bit like sticking your leg into a wood chipper and hoping for the best

Like sticking your good leg in the chipper

BlameItOnTheHenneBlameItOnTheHenneforum_veteran
Dec 1, 2013, 02:32 PM

We'd be undefeated if the field was just 80 yards

Alex44Alex44New Member
Dec 1, 2013, 02:33 PM

I'm pretty sure we will put a couple TDs on the board in the second half. Defense will wear down and w e are already right on the brink.

On the draft Quentin Rollins bandwagon.

SumlitSumlitNew Member
Dec 1, 2013, 02:33 PM

I really cannot understand the overwhelming criticism for Tannehill from this forum. You're talking about a 2nd year QB that was vastly inexperienced to begin with, and you go ahead and place him under these circumstances and ask him to throw 30 times in one half of football.

I cannot understand why people complain about him having issues to correct and suffering from inconsistency. I don't really know what any of you were expecting under these conditions.

rdhstlr23rdhstlr23subscriber
Dec 1, 2013, 02:33 PM

"Aqua4Ever04 wrote:

Hey I signed up for the other site back in '05. I've been kicked in the nuts 16 times, every Sunday, every year, and I still find ways to be optimistic.

You're young aqua and full of life, hahaha. Hey yo each their own. I'm unhappy of the direction of the team and voicing it here where I can...in a respectful manner. Is it pessimistic? Yes.

JMHPhinJMHPhinsubscriber
Dec 1, 2013, 02:34 PM

This why we are fans, blaming tannehill for this teams woes as if it is all on him shows exactly why.

If you could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of your trouble, you wouldn't sit for a month.
Theodore Roosevelt

branbranNew Member
Dec 1, 2013, 02:34 PM

meanwhile the anointed one andrew luck 9-19 122 yards 1 int.

tannehill on pace for 400 yards against a good defense is garbage.

byroan;2178644 wrote:

Tannehill could have had more time had Clabo just fell down and forced Mario to step over him.

BlameItOnTheHenneBlameItOnTheHenneforum_veteran
Dec 1, 2013, 02:34 PM

"Sumlit wrote:

I really cannot understand the overwhelming criticism for Tannehill from this forum. You're talking about a 2nd year QB that was vastly inexperienced to begin with, and you go ahead and place him under these circumstances and ask him to throw 30 times in one half of football.

I cannot understand why people complain about him having issues to correct and suffering from inconsistency. I don't really know what any of you were expecting under these conditions.

I don't think he's been bad, but it's maddening that the offense turns to **** inside the 20. It may not just be him, but he's part of that problem.

DUdullfandanNew Member
Dec 1, 2013, 02:34 PM

I like how we are moving the football, but once we get in the redzone it's like the oc panics...

Some people try to find things in this game that don't exist but football is only two things - blocking and tackling.

Dec 1, 2013, 02:34 PM

"BlameItOnTheHenne wrote:

We'd be undefeated if the field was just 80 yards

lol

PHINS WOLVERINES ROCKETS


DON'T MESS WITH US!

Maliki2Maliki2New Member
Dec 1, 2013, 02:35 PM

"Marino1384 wrote:

Sack means no points on a deep route

Well there are no guarantees with this kicker or team for that matter.

phintasmicphintasmicNew Member
Dec 1, 2013, 02:35 PM

"Sumlit wrote:

I really cannot understand the overwhelming criticism for Tannehill from this forum. You're talking about a 2nd year QB that was vastly inexperienced to begin with, and you go ahead and place him under these circumstances and ask him to throw 30 times in one half of football.

I cannot understand why people complain about him having issues to correct and suffering from inconsistency. I don't really know what any of you were expecting under these conditions.

It's just an underlying lack of football knowledge. Casual fans can only identify with the QB, they don't understand the other parts of the offense and their roles. It's not their faults.

byroanbyroanadmin
Dec 1, 2013, 02:35 PM

We need a James Devlin on this team.

Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk

ABrownLampABrownLampNew Member
Dec 1, 2013, 02:35 PM

Most of the QBs entering the draft in 2014 have more experience than tannehill as a starting QB

Still tho, those deep passes. Oy

djphinfandjphinfansubscriber
Dec 1, 2013, 02:36 PM

"phintasmic wrote:

LOL, to all Tannehill haters, take a look at Geno Smith.

THAT is a bad QB. Tannehill is a HOF QB next to that bum.

Be careful what you wish for.

have you apologized yet for the classlessness you demonstrated?

byroanbyroanadmin
Dec 1, 2013, 02:36 PM

Matt Simms is warming up.

Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk

VanDolPhanVanDolPhansubscriber
Dec 1, 2013, 02:36 PM

The more I watch this squad the more I have 0 issues with this team being blown up from top to bottom.

rdhstlr23rdhstlr23subscriber
Dec 1, 2013, 02:36 PM

"Alex44 wrote:

I'm pretty sure we will put a couple TDs on the board in the second half. Defense will wear down and w e are already right on the brink.

I think the Jets defense will tighten up. Knowing our 2nd half offense, not betting on it.

Alex44Alex44New Member
Dec 1, 2013, 02:36 PM

"rdhstlr23 wrote:

I'm not wishing for Geno. I'm wishing for a competent GM to select a competent QB capable of consistency.

To be fair a lot of people thought Ryan would be too raw to start last year when we drafted him. They thought this year would be his first year starting.

Just because he exceeded our initial expectations doesn't give us the right to completely change the timetable on hid development.

He gort better this offseason IMO and next season should be his make or break season. If he keeps improving and moving towards his max potential I see no reason to ditch him.

My level headed, non confrontational two cents

On the draft Quentin Rollins bandwagon.

padre31padre31luxury_box
Dec 1, 2013, 02:36 PM

"BlameItOnTheHenne wrote:

I don't think he's been bad, but it's maddening that the offense turns to **** inside the 20. It may not just be him, but he's part of that problem.

It's not that, more he seems allergic to hitting open Wr's in stride down the field for Td's

he's great at the underneath and tight window stuff, down the field it's a nightmare.

cuchulainncuchulainnsubscriber
Dec 1, 2013, 02:37 PM

"Sumlit wrote:

I really cannot understand the overwhelming criticism for Tannehill from this forum. You're talking about a 2nd year QB that was vastly inexperienced to begin with, and you go ahead and place him under these circumstances and ask him to throw 30 times in one half of football.

I cannot understand why people complain about him having issues to correct and suffering from inconsistency. I don't really know what any of you were expecting under these conditions.

Agreed... Tannehill is inconsistent, but the pass protection and lack of solid running game support is a huge detriment to his growth. He HAS to hit Clay in the EZ earlier though. That was a devastating overthrow.

rdhstlr23rdhstlr23subscriber
Dec 1, 2013, 02:37 PM

"Aqua4Ever04 wrote:

You're good with me, bud. You don't have to explain yourself. I know what you bring to the discussion and you're one of the posters I always make sure to read when I see a post of yours in a thread I'm in.

Appreciate it dude.

PUpumpdogsforum_veteran
Dec 1, 2013, 02:37 PM

**** here comes the backup

RGFRGFsubscriber
Dec 1, 2013, 02:38 PM

We'te ready to erupt here at the stadium....we just cant FINISH DRIVES...I dont know the stats at the half but its got to be rediculously lop-sided....So far the worst play I witnessed by us is the throw to Hartline down the sidelines...he had steps on the corner D...Tannehill underthew him....might have been 6......Lets go in the second half dammit

Log in to reply.