1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Dolphins trying to roll back cost of No. 1 pick

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by ATVZ400, Apr 14, 2008.

  1. ATVZ400

    ATVZ400 Senior Member

    5,254
    5,111
    0
    Mar 22, 2008
    parts unknown, NJ
    In a post last week I suggested you stop thinking about which player the Dolphins will pick with the first overall selection and think more along the lines of which CONTRACT the Dolphins will offer their first overall selection.

    That's because the team is more likely to pick a player that will agree to the contract it has in mind.

    Well, the Dolphins have a contract on the table to Michigan's Jake Long and guess what? It is for less money than what last year's first overall pick got.

    Last year the Raiders gave JaMarcus Russell a staggering six-year, $62 million deal that included $31 million in guaranteed money.

    The Dolphins have no desire or intention of reaching the $30 million guaranteed money plateau. They are looking to roll back the guaranteed money closer to 2006 levels when Mario Williams signed a six-year contract worth $54 million.

    Williams initially received $21.75 million in guarantees that was increased to $26.5 million after the Texans exercised an option a year later that added that sixth season to the deal.

    So the Dolphins are looking to reel in either Jake Long, or Chris Long or Glenn Dorsey or Vernon Gholston for six years and about $55 million with about $25-$27 in guarantees.

    How can they roll back the price of paying the first overall pick, you ask?

    Well, they are going to ask for, and get, the non-quarterback discount. Because they aren't picking anyone playing the most expensive position on the field, they don't expect to pay like the Raiders did for a QB.

    Secondly, they rolled out their offer to Long with the implicit understanding that they could go chase someone else if he doesn't complete a deal within a certain period of time -- a deadline, if you will. When Russell signed his deal in September of 2007, the Raiders had no such option of picking somebody else if he didn't agree to their terms.

    Finally, the Dolphins are trying to roll back the contract cost for the first overall pick because, well, it makes sense to try.

    And by the way, the team is NOT expected to offer a signing bonus. Ronnie Brown didn't get one in 2005 when he was Miami's No. 2 overall pick and teams have lately been avoiding signing bonuses for expensive rookie deals as a means of countering collective bargaining agreement restrictions while still achieving the maximum value for the deals.

    The player will get guaranteed salary and roster bonuses instead.

    None of this is to suggest the deal Miami offers will, you know, actually get signed immediately. Tom Condon and Ben Dogra, who represent Jake Long and Vernon Gholston, along with Joel Segal (Glenn Dorsey) and Marvin Demoff (Chris Long) are veteran agents. They are not likely to simply roll over like a mutt at the Dolphins' command.

    These agents want as much money for their clients -- and themselves -- as possible. And they are all accustomed to seeing salary scales go up not down from year to year.

    So it shall be an interesting negotiation that Miami has already begun.

    But if any think they're going to take a record bite out of Miami's salary cap based on the JaMarcus Russell contract of 2007, they are probably mistaken.

    Good read
    http://dolphinsindepth.blogspot.com/2008/04/dolphins-trying-to-roll-back-cost-of-no.html
     
    phineas64 likes this.
  2. jdang307

    jdang307 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    39,159
    21,798
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    San Diego
    Not sure if it's ok to post the whole blog, even if it's not an article (correct me if I'm wrong though).

    Thanks for the link though.
     
  3. pocoloco

    pocoloco I'm your huckleberry Club Member

    8,444
    5,721
    113
    Nov 28, 2007
    North Chicagoland
    I think it will still be 30 million guaranteed, or at least very close.
     
  4. Larryfinfan

    Larryfinfan 17-0...Priceless Club Member

    Since he linked it, I don't think there's a problem...

    As to the contracts...I think they'll do what they can to roll back the prices, but I'll bet the deal will be the same as the #2 got last year, if any lower than Young's deal...
     
  5. Jamester23

    Jamester23 Season Ticket Holder

    53
    21
    0
    Mar 24, 2008

    Nice post.

    I think that there should be a solid baseline for the contract of whatever position player we pick. If we go DE we should adjust Mario Williams' contract for inflation and pay that. OL should be whoever was picked last at #1 overall with the contract adjusted for 2008 inflation.
     
  6. gafinfan

    gafinfan gunner Club Member

    If they are going to base it on player position then why not start from where the Joe Thomas contract ended last year. If I were Parcells thats where I would start.
     

Share This Page