Ronnie supporters remember last year. All that matters is who has more voters at the end. Doesn't matter if Sparano has over 100 points on Ronnie if Ronnie has more voters
Should be correct vote with Aqua's vote and my vote: Jake Long [102] Ronnie Brown [136] ++ Tony Sparano [212] --
I would subtract from coach if the Jake voters agreed to do the same. Otherwise it just doesn't make sense. It's kinda like prisoner's dilemma. If we could be assured that all Jake supporters would vote against Sparano, and we Ronnie supporters voted against Sparano, we could probably turn the tide and the payoff would be greater for both parties. Otherwise, it's a zero sum game, and we have to vote against each other. What say you, Jake supporters? A temporary truce and alliance to vote against Sparano?
took some awful amount of time for my vote to post. I deleted it and was going to vote again, but since that time JD included that vote I just deleted, so leave it as it is.
Jake Long [100] Ronnie Brown [134] - Tony Sparano [216] + I went from the last correct post, then factored in brandon and mari0k's votes, then did mine
Jake Long [99] ---- Ronnie Brown [134] Tony Sparano [217] ++++ Thanks for the correction, I didn't want to do that much math this late at night and make it worse.... :-)
Jake Long [100] + Ronnie Brown [134] Tony Sparano [216] - A coach cannot win this thing guys. When in doubt, go with the big LT from MEECHIGAN!!
riiiiiighhhhtt. i've got a secret word for you: i'll give you a hint. starts with hypo, ends with rite. i think there's a c in the middle
Jake Long [101] + Ronnie Brown [133] Tony Sparano [216] - damn, i took two days off, and this is what happens.
Jake Long [100] Ronnie Brown [133] - Tony Sparano [217] + Now coach has to win just because a jest fan said that he cant
Jake Long [102] Ronnie Brown [133] + Tony Sparano [215] - Guess it's worth trying to make a dent in the coach.
