I've heard this repeated a lot. Sometimes WR is put forward as a top need for the team. Please can someone explain to me the case for this because I find it utterly puzzling. I understand that we don't have some all-pro mega-receiver but I don't see that as equating to a 'need'. If it did then we'd 'need' players is almost every position. To me it's obvious that WR is one of our deepest positions and one could argue it's the position of least need along with DE. Instead, real positions of need are LB, TE, OL and then the secondary. I honesty find the WR talk puzzling. So can someone please explain it?