Dan Marino Analyzes Dolphins Offense
9 replies
Yes he is...
They are really stretching it to say Marino analyzes anything in that video.
Don't throw to Venus on a Spider-3 Y-Banana
"Den54 wrote:
Short and sweet, not too in depth.
Don't get Fin D started
"jdang307 wrote:
Don't get Fin D started
Dan can talk about what he knows best.
"bigbry wrote:
Dan can talk about what he knows best.
Just chucking a fastball to the open man.
Marino was a legend. Even being a young guy at 25 I am still thankful that I got to watch him play the game. There will never be another player like him.
Thank you giovafin for this awesome Sig!
I found what he said to be obvious but astute. It really does not matter if the other side knows what your doing if you out execute them. As long as RT continues to grow there is no reason to give up on him but he does need to grow. I think he also he alluded to Wallace needing to put more time in with practicing and getting his timing down. I agree with that too. So yeah he stated the obvious but everything he said was true and he was succinct about it.
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."
Frederic Bastiat
The best thing he said was a sort-of slight of Tannehill. When speaking about the great QBs now (Brady, Peyton, Brees, Rodgers...) Marino says they have "It". That will, desire, competitive edge, whatever you wanna call it. The ones that are great want to be great and make it happen. Separating from Sherman may be the best thing to happen to Tannehill.
I don't think a QB has to be GREAT to win games or even the superbowl, however I do think Tannehill has to be surrounded by talent at RB and Oline, and a O-Coordinator that takes advantage of the abilities at each position.
Don't throw to Venus on a Spider-3 Y-Banana
Love Dan, but the interview was 100% fluff and absolutely no substance. Not that I'm surprised or anything.

"Fame wrote:
Love Dan, but the interview was 100% fluff and absolutely no substance. Not that I'm surprised or anything.
he wasn't going to be really critical especially since he is vying for a position with the company. lol
