1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Brock Osweiler Signed!

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by Galant, Mar 22, 2018.

  1. Galant

    Galant Love - Unity - Sacrifice - Eternity Staff Member

    13,657
    8,381
    113
    Apr 22, 2014


     
  2. tirty8

    tirty8 Well-Known Member

    961
    961
    93
    Jan 2, 2016
    I kinda like this move - big guy with a strong arm. He just needs to work on his accuracy. Perhaps Gase can help him.
     
    Irishman likes this.
  3. Dorfdad

    Dorfdad Well-Known Member

    3,209
    1,696
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Guess they don't see a way of getting one of the young guns in the draft kicking the tires on some older projects.
     
    Irishman likes this.
  4. Unlucky 13

    Unlucky 13 Team Rosen Club Member

    33,735
    35,093
    113
    Apr 24, 2012
    Troy, Virginia
    I like Osweiler as a pure backup. He's 27, knows Gase, has started 25 games in the NFL, and has now been humbled by being bounced around a bit. I think that he can be a good guy to have in the QB room with RT17, and on the sideline on gamedays. And if RT were to miss 3-4 games, then he's as good as anyone still out there to come in and run Gase's system for a few weeks and not mess up.

    The crowd who wants RT gone, and/or wants someone to push him won't be happy. Too bad.
     
    Dummuck, RevRick and Irishman like this.
  5. KeyFin

    KeyFin Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    7,560
    9,806
    113
    Nov 1, 2009
    Didn't he have a massive contract though? Hopefully he'd be okay with backup money
     
    Irishman likes this.
  6. Hoops

    Hoops Well-Known Member

    1,183
    1,484
    113
    Dec 11, 2016
    He’s awful

    Forces the ball to his primary regardless of leverage or coverage played

    Lacks eye discipline. Lucky he has a bazooka arm or he’d throw pick 6s out the wazoo
     
    Hiruma78 likes this.
  7. TheHighExhaulted

    TheHighExhaulted Well-Known Member

    2,688
    2,175
    113
    Jan 15, 2008
    New York
    I think he'd just be happy being on an NFL roster at this point.
     
  8. ripper1961

    ripper1961 Active Member

    259
    190
    43
    Jan 13, 2014
    After all the money that was thrown at him we should get a bargain.
     
    Irishman likes this.
  9. ExplosionsInDaSky

    ExplosionsInDaSky Well-Known Member

    2,289
    1,385
    113
    Sep 13, 2011
    Holy cockadoodie, yer darn tootin he would throw those picker sixers in a heartbeat. Thank cripes he's got a humdinger of an arm. Uf-duh, I hope we don't sign him, no sir-ee boppers.
     
  10. jw3102

    jw3102 season ticket holder

    7,760
    3,486
    113
    Sep 4, 2010
    Maui, Hawaii
    I would rather the Dolphins sign Manziel or just keep Moore as their backup. Osweiler is horrible and how any team is actually looking to sign him is ridiculous.

    I wouldn’t mind them signing Manziel to a small contract and if it doesn’t work out, it’s no big loss. Yet I still think he would be a better signing than Osweiler, who has clearly showed that he is not an effective NFL QB.
     
    shamegame13 likes this.
  11. Dol-Fan Dupree

    Dol-Fan Dupree Tank? Who is Tank? I am Guy Incognito. Club Member

    36,316
    27,068
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    I would rather have Miami sign a Dirty Mop to play quarterback than to bring the highly over rated and terrible Manziel as the quarterback.

    Osweiler is about 500 times the NFL quarterback than Manziel.
     
  12. KeyFin

    KeyFin Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    7,560
    9,806
    113
    Nov 1, 2009
    I heard there were 12+ teams watching Manziel throw at his Pro Day workout today. So even if Gase wanted to try and revive his career, I have a feeling that if he looked good he'll get multiple offers. And if he didn't look good, then we don't have to worry about it anyway.
     
    Irishman likes this.
  13. Deus ex dolphin

    Deus ex dolphin Well-Known Member

    3,063
    1,552
    113
    Dec 2, 2007
    What is the lesser of two evils here? I'd be more inclined to give Manziel a shot, as he seems to have been humbled by his fall out of the NFL and has been working to get back in. He seems a better fit for what Gase wants to do on offense, while Brock will just stand in the pocket and either force a pass or take the sack.

    Even better, maybe we could a QB in the third round? If Luke Falk was there, why not grab him to develop? Actually, even if Brock or Manziel signed on as the #2 QB, Falk would be great as the #3 development project QB.
     
  14. KeyFin

    KeyFin Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    7,560
    9,806
    113
    Nov 1, 2009
    I personally wouldn't be against Manziel as long as it's an incentive contract with virtually nothing to lose. If Gase can help get the kid on track then we have a very talented QB on the cheap; if not then he doesn't make the final cut-down and that's that. Or if he shows anything we don't like....same thing....we cut his butt and lose nothing.

    I know some don't like the guy for non-football reasons, but the way I see it there is only upside here and we could end up with a fantastic QB a few years down the road basically for free. Why not roll the dice?
     
    Irishman and texanphinatic like this.
  15. TheHighExhaulted

    TheHighExhaulted Well-Known Member

    2,688
    2,175
    113
    Jan 15, 2008
    New York
    Of course a lot of you think signing Manziel is a rational solution over signing someone who has actually played a snap in the last three years.
     
    resnor likes this.
  16. pumpdogs

    pumpdogs Well-Known Member

    4,025
    1,578
    113
    Sep 22, 2009
    delaware
    Simply put he stinks!!!
     
    Dummuck likes this.
  17. texanphinatic

    texanphinatic Senior Member

    10,703
    3,904
    113
    Nov 26, 2007
    Detroit Metro Area MI
    Ok so Brock was on the field multiple times, but Im not sure you can really say he "played" while out there. The dude sucks. He's had multiple chances, favorable chances, and sucked badly. There is no upside to bringing in that doofus.

    Manziel has potential if nothing else. If the guy legit had mental issues, got help for that and the drugs and is on a better path, no reason to not explore it.
     
    btfu149 likes this.
  18. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh Club Member

    72,252
    43,682
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    There is no QB that is AVAILABLE that the team would have a chance to win with outside of CKap.

    So anyone else they get....who cares? It literally makes no difference.

    The best thing we can do is a get someone with the most playing experience in the hopes they can occasionally add something to the QB meetings. That's it.
     
    mbsinmisc likes this.
  19. Fin-O

    Fin-O Initiated Club Member

    10,646
    10,317
    113
    Sep 28, 2015
    Osweiler will beat out Tannehill by Week 3, if not training camp.

    Let's discuss.....:blush:
     
    Dorfdad likes this.
  20. firedan

    firedan Well-Known Member

    1,822
    684
    113
    Oct 31, 2008
    palm beach county fl
    No and hell no.
     
  21. Phin McCool

    Phin McCool Well-Known Member

    482
    532
    93
    Jan 29, 2017
    United Kingdom
    And here comes Base of Gase in 3........ 2........... 1.........

    Or is it just Baker that has non-football problems?
     
    KeyFin likes this.
  22. pumpdogs

    pumpdogs Well-Known Member

    4,025
    1,578
    113
    Sep 22, 2009
    delaware
    Just draft somebody to groom!
     
  23. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh Club Member

    72,252
    43,682
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    Obviously.

    That doesn't change what I'm saying about a vet back up.
     
  24. Steve-Mo

    Steve-Mo 'Saban' Guy

    4,355
    397
    83
    Apr 14, 2010
    Western New York
    Disclaimer: I'm just bored.

    Players certainly have strengths and weaknesses that can be hidden (or accentuated) by scheme and supporting cast. Of course, this is a frequent topic on this forum in particular. It's fair to wonder whether or not players (particularly QBs) were afforded opportunities to display their worth.

    People keep saying Foles is an exception and that generally your backup is going to not perform well. This may be true - but it's also true that Philadelphia adapted their scheme for him to succeed (and that 17% of SBs were won with backup QBs). I remember the narrative on hiring Gase was his ability to adapt his scheme to his players.

    Had Philadelphia not made the playoffs: there is no hoopla over him. He averaged a paltry 5.3 yards per attempt. He's still a 1 year wonder and the product of Chip Kelly's short lived NFL success. I remember he looked pretty awful playing for Jeff Fisher a few years back and was a bit of a joke.

    Austin Davis (who is a FA) actually played better than Foles in STL, putting up a QBR 16 points higher. His next, and only, shot (?) after was in 2 Cleveland divisional games.

    I remember watching (free agent) Geno Smith play last year in place of Eli Manning and thinking that he actually looked decent and was a quality backup. He's only seen significant time in his first 2 years, when he struggled with turnovers, but you may also recall his 350 yard 3 TD game as his last NYJ start.

    Basically, what I'm getting at, is there have been a number of relative failures that have gone on to have success as lower level FA signings. Jake Plummer, Kerry Collins, Jake Delhomme, Kurt Warner, and Rich Gannon come to mind. Brian Hoyer went 10-6 in Cleveland. It seems more probable than not that there are still potentially successful QBs on the market if given the means to succeed. It's probably not Brock Osweiler though.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2018
    mbsinmisc, Irishman and KeyFin like this.
  25. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    11,033
    4,050
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    I rather bring back Matt Moore. I think its unlikely a qb drops to 11 so we might be looking at Luke Falk in the second round.
     
  26. pumpdogs

    pumpdogs Well-Known Member

    4,025
    1,578
    113
    Sep 22, 2009
    delaware
    Whats the point in wasting money on a vet backup?Tannehill gets hurt the season is over anyway.Let the rookie get some reps.
     
    mbsinmisc likes this.
  27. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh Club Member

    72,252
    43,682
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    Because you need 3 QBs.
     
    RevRick likes this.
  28. Galant

    Galant Love - Unity - Sacrifice - Eternity Staff Member

    13,657
    8,381
    113
    Apr 22, 2014
     
  29. Nappy Roots

    Nappy Roots Well-Known Member

    10,191
    4,187
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    Bradenton,FL
    Hopefully his plane takes a detour and he never even visits
     
    mbsinmisc likes this.
  30. Dol-Fan Dupree

    Dol-Fan Dupree Tank? Who is Tank? I am Guy Incognito. Club Member

    36,316
    27,068
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    I don't like him for football reasons. I think he is a great college quarterback who does not have the talent to play the kind of ball he does in the pros. He is a back up talent with a super star mindset.

    The dude is Jake Locker without the talent with a huge ego.
     
  31. texanphinatic

    texanphinatic Senior Member

    10,703
    3,904
    113
    Nov 26, 2007
    Detroit Metro Area MI
    While it is unlikely that a backup has great success, there have to be better than the Brock Lobster out there. Dude is just flat out bad. That's the point for me. He's not worth a half eaten donut, he doesn't deserve a roster space, he has 0 upside. Take a risk on someone that hasn't had all the chances and failed. If it's coming down to a backup, go for ceiling rather than floor.

    Everyone played poorly for Jeff Fischer. Jeff Fischer is a horrifically mediocre coach with a special aptitude for destroying offenses and QBs.
     
  32. Unlucky 13

    Unlucky 13 Team Rosen Club Member

    33,735
    35,093
    113
    Apr 24, 2012
    Troy, Virginia
    Absolutely nothing good can come from signing Manziel. The dude would corrupt at least part of the locker room. He's toxic.
     
  33. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh Club Member

    72,252
    43,682
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    There is only CKap. If a team isn't willing to grab Cap, then there really isn't anyone significantly better.
     
    mbsinmisc likes this.
  34. Nappy Roots

    Nappy Roots Well-Known Member

    10,191
    4,187
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    Bradenton,FL
    What talent did Locker have that Manziel didnt? Size? Big arm? Manziels arm talent as a whole ran circles around Locker. There is one reason Manziel isn't or won't be successful in the NFL and its nothing to do with his football talent.
     
  35. Dol-Fan Dupree

    Dol-Fan Dupree Tank? Who is Tank? I am Guy Incognito. Club Member

    36,316
    27,068
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    Locker was an amazing talent.

    Manziel is a good college talent with great PR.
     
    Dummuck likes this.
  36. Unlucky 13

    Unlucky 13 Team Rosen Club Member

    33,735
    35,093
    113
    Apr 24, 2012
    Troy, Virginia
    I would dispute that. I thought that Locker was a much better college QB than Manziel. Take away the crazy playground nonsense, and I'm not sure how good Manziel would have even been at that level, let alone the NFL.

    And then there's of course the fact that he's a pile of **** as a human being.
     
    mbsinmisc likes this.
  37. texanphinatic

    texanphinatic Senior Member

    10,703
    3,904
    113
    Nov 26, 2007
    Detroit Metro Area MI
    I agree that Cap is clearly the only proven QB available, and clearly what a team that wants to be the best would do.

    However, barring that, not all the rest of the QB's are equal. I would absolutely take Manziel over Brock. Manziel may be terrible or flame out ... but **** who knows. We KNOW Brock is terrible and not worth a used diaper. Take a guy with an unknown but potentially higher ceiling instead of a guy everyone knows is just bad. Try to find a guy who was in a bad scheme fit, who was underutilized, who had poor coaching, etc. Foles was a great example. Some early success, then got into a bad situation with a bad scheme and bad coach.
     
  38. Dol-Fan Dupree

    Dol-Fan Dupree Tank? Who is Tank? I am Guy Incognito. Club Member

    36,316
    27,068
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    Manziel is worse than Brock.
     
  39. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh Club Member

    72,252
    43,682
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    I dunno, I just think the chance of Manziel doing anything useful is so slim it isn't worth the headache he'll likely cause.
     
    RevRick likes this.
  40. Nappy Roots

    Nappy Roots Well-Known Member

    10,191
    4,187
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    Bradenton,FL
    Bologne. Locker was nothing more than a hype train. Classic big arm QB that couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. I hate how people always forget accuracy as a "talent". I am sure you see Josh Allen as the most talented QB in this class as well.

    What on gods green earth were you guys watching? Locker was not a good QB. People can hate Manziel all they want and I agree. Hes a piece of ****. But to say Jake Locker was a better COLLEGE QB than him is one of the most laughable things I have ever seen posted.

    Locker College Stats
    40 Games
    54% Completion Percentage
    7639 Yards
    53 TDs
    35 INTs
    1939 Rushing 29 TDs

    Manziel
    26 Games
    68.9% Completion Percentage
    7820 Yards
    63 TDs
    22 INTs
    2169 Rushing 30 TDs

    Hahaha. You have to be joking me.
     
    shamegame13 and Irishman like this.

Share This Page