1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Jogging vs. Walking

Discussion in 'Health and Fitness' started by bg34, Feb 8, 2009.

  1. bg34

    bg34 Junior Member

    987
    188
    63
    Nov 26, 2007
    Virginia
    What do you guys/girls think is better for your overall heath, weight loss, etc. I currently run about 3 miles on the treadmill at 6 mph. I do this an average of 3-4 times a week. Not too fast, but it's all I can manage right now. But I'm wondering if results would be better if I just slowed it down to a fast walk, allowing me to go maybe 5 miles or so?
     
  2. HolliFinFan

    HolliFinFan Not a Face Painter Luxury Box

    2,220
    1,480
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    South Florida
    In my experience, it's best to mix up the workout, whether it's running or fast-walking. Most treadmills have a feature to vary the speed. (It's usually called "weight loss") You also may want to slow down the speed and up the elevation. Another thing to consider (if you have the equipment) is to vary the cardio--ride the bike one day or do the elliptical. Varying the workout keeps the body from being conditioned to the same one. Hope this helps.
     
    jason8er, JCowScot and bg34 like this.
  3. charlestonphan

    charlestonphan Junior Member

    4,229
    1,493
    0
    Mar 22, 2008
    how about fast walking about two miles as your warm up before beginning your run?
     
    bg34 likes this.
  4. JCowScot

    JCowScot So funky the dead dance

    4,200
    1,825
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    FLA USA
    I agree with Holli about mixing it up while running. I posted why in Bumrush's thread here: http://forums.thephins.com/showpost.php?p=576973&postcount=24

    I honestly don't think jogging for a couple of hours 3-4 times a week is good for your health, as there have been quite a few recent studies that document the accelerated deterioration of the knee and ankle joints in habitual runners, not to mention the cardio benefits aren't that great comparatively with the amount of time spent on this steady-state, low-intensity activity. *Note: I define 'health' as "Free from disease and malady." 'Fitness', on the other hand, is "What is required to raise one's level of exertion beyond a resting rate." I think what your are looking for is overall good fitness, not health- at least, in this sense.*



    I would suggest going with one of the interval programs on the treadmill, for no more than 30 min., 3x a week. Or, to save the pounding on your knees, the bike or elliptical. Elliptical would be my first choice. Swimming is also a good exercise for gaining in fitness and preserving the joints. Just some suggestions.

    **Edit: I had a conversation the other day, and it made me realize something: If running is something you enjoy, then by all means keep doing it. It's no worse than playing contact sports competitively or rock climbing or any number of other activities that will come back to bite you as you get older. I'm sure my hands will be riddled from arthritis after years of rock climbing, but I enjoy it. I figure just about everyone here is an adult, so as long as you know the risks and are willing to accept the consequences, then keep doing what makes you happy. Just thought I'd add this as an addendum.**
     
    DonShula84 and bg34 like this.
  5. bg34

    bg34 Junior Member

    987
    188
    63
    Nov 26, 2007
    Virginia
    Thanks for the replies. I am looking into getting an elliptical machine also.
     
  6. Fin-Omenal

    Fin-Omenal Initiated

    36,936
    10,264
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Thee...Ohio State University
    Yes, get an eliptical machine. If possible put it in fron of a television or some form of entertainment.

    We have a huge projection movie theatre at the gym I work out at and if you "get into" a movie you can really go some distance.

    Fatigue is real but 75% mental.
     
    bg34 likes this.

Share This Page