Um, yeah so where did I give the filmmaker a pass again? In fact: Also, when was the last time you saw a movie that gave you sources? No where did I say the movie was fact, but you sir, claiming its complete bunk, because you went to a web site that used unreliable sources and argued many points the film didn't make is ridiculous. As long as its stickin' it to them dirty heathens, non-believers, Atheists, free thinkers, or anyone who doesn't just except what they're told...lol
No prob. It just drives me nuts when people bend the meaning of facts one way or another to suit there needs, beliefs, superstitions, etc. Often in the same breath no less.
If this after all is the point of the movie: The Bible is nothing more than an astro-theological literary fold hybrid, just like nearly all religious myths before it Then the film maker fell flat in his face. So many people are treating this tripe as gospel, it's staggering
There is an addendum to the first movie with new stuff for those interested. Havent watched it yet, but I hear it's interesting. [ame="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912&ei=ZMNjSeCiK6e6qAOknpnECw&q=Zeitgeist+Addendum"]Zeitgeist: Addendum[/ame]
- and I don't have a problem with that. But propoganda like Zeitgeist is a perfect example of how atheist / secular humanists can be just as gullible.
infinsible was obsessed with this documentary. anyone who questioned it was immediately flamed by him dude was livid!