Thought some of you may want to see what we will all be arguing about this offseason. There seems to be alot more out there about Dorsey (no suprise there), but what little I've seen of Long is still very impressive. Honestly, I'll take either one. If healthy though, I think I'd prefer Dorsey. Watching those double and triple teams, his speed, and him literally throwing those OL guys around with just his arms is just sick to watch. No wonder JT wants this guy next to him. And contrary to what some are saying, he is absolutely a Parcells kinda guy. Again though, I'll take either one. Dorsey [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EWHdz2nygU[/ame] http://www.rivals.com/video.asp?section=football&pkey=37962&vidtype=highlight&vidid=840 Long http://www.rivals.com/video.asp?section=football&pkey=35573&vidtype=highlight&vidid=845
Really a toss up for me. Health is the biggest issue. IF Dorsey is healthy thorughout the physicals/combines etc etc, Id like him, although Long is very intriguing. He could be a major stud.
I like Glenn Dorsey alot more than I like Chris Long for Miami. Long to me looks like he's going to end up as a strictly 4-3 DE, rather than someone who can play in a 3-4 well. He's like Patrick Kerney, or a rich man's Matt Roth, someone who has the frame to bulk up, but probabaly should be playing in the 270-280 range. You're almost certainly going to be disappointed. Bill Parcells philosophy is that you spend your biggest resources on athletic big men, because those are the most difficult and rare to find, and he's a strongly defensive guy. When you look at the top 5 in this draft, it's very possible that Darren McFadden is the only non-DL taken.
L-S-U, L-S-U, L-S-U! WOOOOO I love Dorsey. however, I love Chris Long too. I also like Gholston. Wooo It's gonna be pretty hard for Parcells to upset me on draft day.
Only if he drafts a Punter in the first round. Thats all i can see. I mean I'll even be happy with Jake Long/McFadden/Laurinaitis. Needless to say, i like this draft.
Not saying i want McFadden. I love Ronnie. In a man-crush sort of way no less. But i didn't want Ginn either, but knowing what he can do for our offense made it okay with me. It'd be kind of the same with McFadden. He's not high on my list though. As i said, Dorsey's #1. Then Chris Long.
I think based on need that Dorsey is the pick. The middle of our line was atrocious this year against the run. If Parcells can fill the middle via free agency (probably what he wants to do), they would go for Long but I think right now the pick has to be Dorsey. Looking at that video I would be happy to have him in the middle for the next decade or so.
Yeah, ya think? Looks to me like he drafted in the first round: The Skill guys: 3 QB's that all were a success. 1 WR that was a success 2 DB's 1 success and 1 early but good. Total of 6 and all good players The Big Guys: 4 DE's, 1 a success, 1 a bust, 2 looking good but early. 2 LB's 1 success and 1 bust. 1 TE (blocking variety) 1 not so good (Anthony Becht) Total of 7 and 4 good players Hell, going by that he is much better not picking big men. Kinda blows the theory on the street about what is and isn't a safe pick, at least for Parcells. Again I just don't see how you can ignore Miami averaged 13 points a game the last half, yes without Ronnie but we are always without Ronnie.
I take nothing out of a highlight reel, it is after all a "Highlight" reel, on the Dorsey one looks like they got all his 5 1/2 sacks....ohhh, nice.
it really depends on how much dorsey weighs at the combine. to be honest, i would be shocked if he weighs over 300lbs right now. which is way too small for a NT ill take gholston
Man I am torn between Dorsey/Chris Long. Really there is no need for Chris Long because we Have Rod Wright. We need someone who can push the Middle. I would love our front three to look like this Rod Wright Dorsey Holiday (rotating with Paul Solial and Matt Roth)
I agree if Rod Wright can play this year the way we've been waiting for, he and Dorsey could be an outstanding young 1-2 punch. I'm not sold that Holliday is sticking around, though. Matt Roth has not shown me that he is what we had hoped for, either. If either Roth or Soliai could develop along with Wright and Dorsey, then we have 3 young studs on the DL... obviously DL and conditioning coaches are going to be key here.
Why do you think he can't play in a 3-4 well? Were the last three years as a 3-4 DE, having Al Groh say he's the 2nd best player he's ever coached and having the school already retire his jersey not enough evidence that's he's been a pretty darn good 3-4 DE?
Put me down for Chris Long. Here's some great info about him.... http://www.virginiasports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=88799&SPID=10606&DB_OEM_ID=17800&ATCLID=1290023 http://www.virginiasports.com/ViewA...&DB_OEM_ID=17800&ATCLID=1133501&Q_SEASON=2007
Good to see a Wanny quote in there... "He's the best defensive lineman that I've seen on tape. He's a playmaker. He does it all. He plays the run well. He knocks balls down, and he plays all over the place. He'll be outside as an end, and then he'll move inside as a tackle. ... He's quick, and he's strong. And he plays so hard. He's got it all, and in my opinion he'll be a first-round (NFL Draft) pick." – Dave Wannstedt, Pittburgh head coach Geez Dave, way to go out on a limb. You sure he's a first rounder? With that said, if Wanny likes him so much perhaps I need to reconsider my position on him
He? He wasnt solely in charge of personnel decisions in some of his stops. Are you going to sit there and tell me that the "Planet Theory" isnt Parcells philosophy? Or are you going to tell me that the general consensus at the top of this draft isnt DL? Whenever I saw him play, he wasnt lining up like a true 3-4 DE. He was lined up outside of the tackles. When I saw him heads up on the tackle and being run at, he didnt impress me a whole lot.
You haven't seen him play very much then, because it's nearly impossible to not come away impressed. He's been drawing double teams yet racking up sacks and stuffing the run as a 3-4 DE his entire career. He plays both end positions and they occasionally move him inside and can even drop him back in coverage as an OLB, but he's primarily been a 3-4 DE, the best the school's ever seen. When Al Groh says he's the best player in the country, you'd better believe Bill Parcells is going to listen.
Wow this could explain our failures in some of our previous drafts. Looking at our drafts in the early 2000s is like a whos who of busts. Oh and Chris Long is a manbeast, Dorsey gets hurt or is limping evertime I see him play. No Thanks.
LOL @ the theory that Glenn Dorsey has injury issues. He's a remarkable DT and would be my pick over Long, another fantastic player, but one who I think may be close to maxing out his talent. How much higher is his ceiling now than in 10 years? I think it's lower than Dorsey's. Is Chris as good as Jared Allen or Kyle Van Den Bosch? Is he as good as Mike Vrabel? Is he better? Personally, Dorsey is a cross between Leonard Marshall, Tommie Harris and Kevin Williams. That's talent right there. Plus, he can play every spot on the DL from 4-3 and 3-4 end to NT and every technique you could name. I think he's around 304, but could easily get to 315 and play the nose, with no loss of that 1st 3 step speed.
Won't argue with you on upside, Dorsey's could certainly be higher than Long's. Dorsey's floor is much lower though IMO. Whether this year's injury problems are a one time thing or not, they're still a concern for a team that can't afford to miss on this pick. That, coupled with more uncertainty of where/how he'd be used in a Parcells D. With Long, I don't see a possibility of him not being a solid, though perhaps unspectacular, 10+ year pro.
I would take dorsey, he causes pure chaos in the middle of opposing teams o-lines , have you seen the clip when he literally launches an Auburn defender into the air? Hes going to be an amazing player
Why spend $60M on a 3-4 DE? That's the only question I have regarding him. I'm sure there are other 3-4 DE's that can be found later on and are bigger than Chris Long...maybe not as good a college player, but so be it.
Boomer summed up my thoughts nicely. Both guys are fine players, but I think Dorsey has the higher ceiling. He's gonna be an absolute stud at the next level.
He got cut blocked. He didn't rupture any ligaments. Did he look injury prone on Monday night? You'd be happy signing off with an "unspectacular" #1 overall pick. Thanks, but I'll pass.
Every player in the draft has a chance of being "unspectacular". The point I was trying to make is, perhaps C. Long doesn't end up becoming an annual all-pro, but I think at worst he'll deliver a Trace Armstrong like 10+ year, 8-11 sacks per year and quality leadership. I'm not sure if his ceiling is a lot higher than that, but I don't think the team that drafts C. Long will ever regret it. Dorsey, on the other hand, has the potential to have a Warren Sapp like career (disruption/production wise, not comparing their play), but I can also see him having a shorter career and perhaps not being as effective in the pros (see Gerard Warren, waste of a #3 pick in 2001). A few years ago I argued that Cromartie was too dangerous of a pick for Miami at #16 because of his knee injury, but you felt his upside was through the roof and worth the gamble. Turns out, the risk would've been well rewarded. You were right then and may be here too, but when you're giving a guy 40-50 million and trying to build a franchise around someone, I'd lean towards someone I felt was a sure thing.
I'm still 50/50 between Long and Dorsey. Right now I'd have to say Dorsey, but I think it depends on the combine, etc. before I make a decision.
Gholston would be great, its just that everytime I remember the name Justin Fargas, I really get nauseated and hope for Dorsey...