1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Dolphins offensive line improving at run game, protecting Tannehill

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by Sceeto, Dec 19, 2015.

  1. Sceeto

    Sceeto Well-Known Member

    13,501
    6,246
    113
    Oct 13, 2008
    New York
    http://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news...ensive-line-improving-at-run-game-prot/npnRt/


    :pointlol: :wink2:
     
    AdamC13 likes this.
  2. jdang307

    jdang307 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    39,159
    21,798
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    San Diego
    Yes! His elite level stats the last two games show the clear improvement in the oline

    ;)
     
    Finster likes this.
  3. Piston Honda

    Piston Honda Well-Known Member

    7,853
    8,088
    113
    Sep 23, 2014
    Damn you!!! LOL
     
  4. resnor

    resnor Derp Sherpa

    16,329
    9,874
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    New Hampshire
    Yeah, cause the oline is the only thing people have talked about. His receivers certainly didn't let him down at all.

    And sacks aren't the only judge of how well a line is doing.
     
  5. Sceeto

    Sceeto Well-Known Member

    13,501
    6,246
    113
    Oct 13, 2008
    New York
    :lol:
     
  6. Finster

    Finster Finsterious Finologist

    3,087
    2,038
    113
    Jul 27, 2013
    Miami is 12th in YAC, so his WRs are helping him out big time.
     
    KeyFin likes this.
  7. resnor

    resnor Derp Sherpa

    16,329
    9,874
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    New Hampshire
    Yeah, they really are helping when they do balls at big tones in games.

    Regardless, what's they're YAC ranking if you take out the Houston game?
     
  8. AdamC13

    AdamC13 Well-Known Member

    2,148
    1,398
    113
    May 3, 2010
    Wait...for QBs throwing 200+ passes Tannehill is exactly in the middle of dropped passes...16 above and 16 below. How can this be?

    http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/dropped-passes-by-quarterback/2015/

    Of course anyone who has watched Tannehill throw this year will have observed other than the Titan-Texan games his ball-placement has not been all the good which significantly contributes to drops.
     
    jdang307, Finster and Sceeto like this.
  9. Sceeto

    Sceeto Well-Known Member

    13,501
    6,246
    113
    Oct 13, 2008
    New York
    Was just about to post this when I saw yours. Look who's #1. lol

    Most drops suffered by QBs this season:

    Tom Brady: 43
    Derek Carr: 34
    Ryan Tannehill: 31
    Aaron Rodgers: 30
    Sam Bradford: 30
     
  10. KeyFin

    KeyFin Well-Known Member

    10,488
    12,821
    113
    Nov 1, 2009
    That was mainly early this season when he was throwing to primarily 3rd stringers. Sadly, they've become a lot more efficient since then.
     
  11. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    Anyone got the stats for a QB thriving with a bad oline, bad OCs, abandoned run game and not allowed to audible?

    Anyone?


    Helllllooooooooooooo?
     
  12. AdamC13

    AdamC13 Well-Known Member

    2,148
    1,398
    113
    May 3, 2010
    Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha....
     
    Finster likes this.
  13. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    You misspelled, "no I don't have those stats because no QB has ever thrived under those circumstances".
     
  14. AdamC13

    AdamC13 Well-Known Member

    2,148
    1,398
    113
    May 3, 2010
    Let's see the past two weeks Miami's OL has played well, running game was excellent against the Ravens and set up the passing game against the Giants and IS allowed to audible. All this going up against two of the worst pass defenses in the NFL.

    Baltimore defense: 288 for 459 (62.7%), 3228 yards (7.4 YPA), 27 TD, 4 int = 101.3 QB rating...give up 25.1 PPG

    Tannehill: 9 of 19 (47.4%), 86 yards (4.53 YPA), 1 TD, 0 int = 78 QB rating...offense scores 7 points

    NY Giants defense: 353 for 530 (66.6%), 4009 yards (7.7 YPA), 23 TD, 14 int = 93.2 QB rating...give up 24.6 PPG

    Tannehill: 25 of 41 (61%), 236 yards (5.76 YPA), 1 TD, 0 int = 85 QB rating...offense scores 24 points

    So even when the OL plays well, a balanced rush/pass (Ravens) and set up by the run (Giants), Tannehill gets to contribute to the game-plan (why the **** would they plan to wear out Landry right away in the game and Tannehill not throw early to Parker after the play he made against the Ravens is idiotic), gets to audible and plays against POOR defenses Tannehill still plays like, well, Tannehill. Actually worse.

    Must suck that the very excuses used to justify him playing poorly have been removed the past couple of weeks and he still play poorly.
     
    Finster likes this.
  15. bakedmatt

    bakedmatt Well-Known Member

    2,129
    909
    113
    Mar 29, 2008
    Orlando, FL
    Who is responsible for determining and recording drops? Anyone know?
     
  16. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    They have not played well at all.

    I see the problem you think sacks are the only thing that show if a oline has played well or not. Makes sense, you think wins are the only thing that indicate a QB has played well.

    You still haven't answer my question...shocking.

    Your deflections are getting more complex though....soooooo.....good for you?
     
  17. AdamC13

    AdamC13 Well-Known Member

    2,148
    1,398
    113
    May 3, 2010
    Uh huh...cool story, bro.
     
    Finster likes this.
  18. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    Typical response.
     
  19. AdamC13

    AdamC13 Well-Known Member

    2,148
    1,398
    113
    May 3, 2010
    Uh huh...you know I answered you about a week ago. Do your own research or pay me. Your not the boss of me, it's not my job to do your research for you.

    You obviously haven't figured out yet that you are the only who cares about what you keep asking.
     
    Finster likes this.
  20. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    The hell you did.
     
  21. AdamC13

    AdamC13 Well-Known Member

    2,148
    1,398
    113
    May 3, 2010
    Oh, you sound upset

    Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
     
  22. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    Upset? Hardly. Just calling you on the bs you're spreading.
     
  23. AdamC13

    AdamC13 Well-Known Member

    2,148
    1,398
    113
    May 3, 2010
    You're so amazing


    Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
     
  24. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    You're so avoiding the same question.
     
  25. AdamC13

    AdamC13 Well-Known Member

    2,148
    1,398
    113
    May 3, 2010
    No I'm not. I've answered you a couple of times now which is, I could care less, do your own research or pay me, doesn't show Tannehill is any good, and your predictable response would be to argue the OL and/or OC are good so it would be pointless and a waste of time..

    Is that really hard for you to understand that is your answer?

    Are you sure you're not just upset because Tannehill now has a record of 28-33?

    Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
     
  26. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    No you have not. I'm asking for names of QBs that have thrived with certain criteria. You've never provided those names. You instead post crap that tries to obfuscate what I'm asking or these gems:

    And that's just this thread.
     
  27. djphinfan

    djphinfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    111,652
    67,546
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    for having such a low ypa his completetion percentage is pretty low as well dont ya think?
     

Share This Page