This was better than the Wildcat game. That was just a gimmick we surprised Bellichick with. This game, by the second half at least, was a pure beatdown of epic proportions.
Oh believe me, it is very embarrassing losing to such a low tier team. But we've dealt with such embarrassing losses before and have had success the rest of the year and even went on to win SBs.
Good thing 1 completion and a ridiculous amount of awful throws translates to a win, eh? eh???? Every QB will hit them eventually. Tom just proved that everyone needs to do the work for him because those are some damn near impossible balls to catch. This liar claims he watched the game, yet somehow missed the 4th quarter. Sick game winning drive btw
I guess I should scroll up and see where I referenced anything about teams 40 years ago. I don't care about 40 years ago. I care about how awful your team is and how you just got manhandled and your trophy QB is on a blatantly obvious and embarrassing decline. Really bro? All of our starting linebackers and safetys out of the game? and THAT is the game he played? LOL. SUPERBOWL!!!!!!!!!
Um where were you guys before the Cheating Dynasty began? Oh yea rooting for the Red Sox and Celtics.
Only the least knowledgeable people claim this gave us any advantage. They literally could have done the same thing with a pen and paper instead of a camera and it would have been perfectly legal. But I know it's just envy and jealousy of our success so I will let it slide.
And no starting Center. Yet they whined that Mankins was traded and thats why Brady got blitzed to hell. Really? WE HAD 5 NEW STARTERS ON THE OL! lol Patriot fan logic is hilarious.
Relevant enough to send your girls home for the playoffs in 2008, but that was 6 years ago. What have y'all done since?! Anything of "relevance?" 31 teams fail every year...you're in the same boat of irrelevance we are...and have been for a WHILE...live with it.
Must be pretty stupid to get caught making that mistake then...since it could've so easily been done legally... Preeeeeetty stupid...
Your argument is invalid because it's one game. One game is not a trend. People used the same argument when we lost to Buffalo 31-0 in the opener in 2003. Brady was intercepted 4 times that game. Then we went on to win the SB. If we get embarrassed next week you will have a point. But you're just making things up now.
Yeah right no big deal. I mean Goodell at least sought to it to fine you guys the maximum and took a draft pick away before covering it up after Kraft whined and other owners panicked about the league's integrity. At least we can point and laugh that you haven't won jack since. And it can be argued that it did give you an edge since your team seemingly no longer looks like it knows what the other team is doing anymore.
That's cool you were previously destroyed in an opener just like you were yesterday, Thanks for the info. Although, I'm sure buffalo had their starters. LOL My argument is invalid? Yeah no. Second string linebackers. All of them. Safetys. ALL gone. I'm talking 3rd string and lower. More than half our entire defense was a preseason lineup and tom played like a complete scrub. LOL. So..... You couldn't beat a bench defense... but you're going to beat teams with better defenses than ours WITH their starters out? I thought you were a genius, you socially inept tool.
You mean when we went 11-5 with Cassell. That was a tremendous coaching and team performance. Yes, you tied the Cassell led Pats and held the tiebreaker, winning the division for the first time since...?
They play the vikings next week, maybe the vikings can put out their practice squad so the pats have a chance, since obviously 2nd string and lower defenses give them a hard enough time in a game they had all offseason to train and prep for.
The entire 2003 Buffalo team was basically full of 3rd stringers. They went 6-10. And some of your backups are better than your starters. You have no argument. I wouldn't expect someone like you to comprehend that 1 game is not a sufficient sample size form which you can extrapolate anything.
I don't remember saying 1 game was a sample size of anything. I said your QB played like garbage and is on a blatant decline. That's a fact outside of TOMBRADYFORPRESIDENTVILLE, USA I used my eyes, and saw you get destroyed in 1 game, one of the most embarrassing games i've ever seen for any team. So how many games will be the barometer?
You're right. However we beat you the last two games we played you. We should have won the first one last year but the refs rescued you again. That's relevant. That's recent. That means you belong to us right now.
It was the heat I tell you! How dare the NFL schedule a game in Miami in September! All of our home games should be in December btw. - Patriots fans
We were embarrassed a lot worse by a much worse team in 2003. Means absolutely nothing. 1 game is not enough to claim that Brady is in decline. If we continue to play like we did into week 4 or 5 then I will be worried.
You lost to much worst teams and won the superbowl.....10+ years ago. Why the hell does that matter right now when your team looks like trash?
For the millionth time, because looking like trash in 1 game means absolutely nothing. Is it really that difficult to comprehend?
But it's okay to predict superbowl or anything close to it after a disgusting game 1 loss because it happened 10+ years ago. Got it chief.
If my QB was renown for his ability to comeback in the 4th qtr and win games, and he started his season looking like absolute garbage in the 4th when his team is losing against an 'inferior' opponent, I'd be concerned.
You have 62 posts on a Phins forum in 2 days. You say you are a quantitative analysis who makes more money than anyone here. I ask again, how do you find the time?
He was 36 last year and was the only reason we were in the AFCCG and only lost by 10 points. He is the least of our worries.
