1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Amount of money and draft value invested in O-line vs QB - Are you okay with it?

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by Bpk, Aug 4, 2011.

  1. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    We badly need stability at the QB position.

    Has the front office done enough to find a franchise QB over the regime's three years here?

    Some accuse Sparano and the front office of focusing too much time and money on the offensive line and too little on quarterback. I thought I'd take a quick look at the amount of draft value, FA dollars and trade dollars/picks invested in upgrading both areas of the team.

    Here's the info. Let me know what you think.



    DRAFT

    OLine
    Pouncey 1050
    John Jerry 225
    Andrew Gardner 19
    Jake Long 3000
    Shawn Murphy 74
    Donald Thomas 13.4
    --------------------------------
    4,381.4 points


    QB
    Pat White 460
    Chad Henne 330
    -----------------------------
    790 points





    FA Contracts


    OLine
    Richie Incognito 1st signing $1.1m/1yr - Re-signing $9-10m/3yrs
    Marc Columbo (undisclosed. 2010 - $2.14m, 2011 salary was going to be $1.9m bef. cut. Assume big injury discount. Salary in $800-900k range?)
    Joe Berger $2.5m/3yrs
    Justin Smiley $25m/5yr
    Jake Grove $29.5m/5yr
    Cory Proctor $1.759m/1yr


    QB
    Matt Moore $5mil/2yrs
    Chad Pennington $11.5m/2yrs + 1yr extension @ $2.5m



    TRADES

    OLine
    Nothing noteworthy (that I could remember)

    QB
    Tyler Thigpen $465,200 (and undisclosed pick... low round, future draft)


    So, do you feel okay with this? If not, why not? If so, are you banking on Henne or another option?
     
    Rhody Phins Fan likes this.
  2. Stringer Bell

    Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    There is one big problem with this...
     
    Bpk likes this.
  3. Shamboubou

    Shamboubou Well-Known Member

    2,228
    1,004
    113
    Jan 4, 2008
    Indianapolis
    You have to get the right person at the right time. It doesn't matter if you draft 2nd round talent in the first round, it doens't make them a better player where they are drafted. We really haven't had that opportunity. Would you really have felt better about this season going into it with a rookie that just came into camp?? Would you have felt better about this season if we gave Kolb the amount of money Ariz. gave him when his stats were worse than Henne's when he played??

    Everbody likes to talk about all the QB's that we missed in the draft, when the fact of the matter is this. How many QB's did we go through in the past years because the QB got hurt?? Quite a few that I can remember, why is that?? Because we had no offensive line. You put a rookie back there, say....Matt Ryan and you turn him into David Carr or Joey Harrington.
     
    Bpk likes this.
  4. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    The Oline is FIVE GUYS!!!

    QB is ONE!!!


    I know that. ;)

    That's why I just give the info and you can make your OWN decision as to whether it looks like the right amount of resources in each area.

    I give no conclusion here. I DO assume people are smart enough to understand that Oline has more starters.

    That said, Qb is the 'most important position on the field'. As such, you'd think it'd get more than 1/4 the resources of the Oline, no?
     
  5. dolfan32323

    dolfan32323 ty xphinfanx

    12,587
    1,574
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    Washington DC
    I am glad that this team hasn't "overpayed" for any QBs, but the lack of urgency in addressing the problem is a big concern to me.
     
    smahtaz and Aquafin like this.
  6. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box


    So for you, the investment in OL is justified.

    I guess I'd agree with that if the investment in QB was even slightly more... if not in the draft, then at least a free agent signing of note at some point. It's not like we seem set at QB. Oh wait...


    CRAP I forgot Pennington!!!

    OOOPS. Gotta go add that in!! Big eff up. lol.
     
  7. Stringer Bell

    Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    No, you didn't include Pennington in your original post. And after you edited it, you still didn't include his extension.

    I'm also not sure there is any correlation between spending on one unit and not the other. I don't see any evidence that spending on OL precluded any spending on QB. I also dont think anyone here wanted us to draft or sign a QB until after 2010.
     
    unluckyluciano and Bpk like this.
  8. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    I don;t know if there is or isn't a correlation directly between spending on OL and QB, but it IS an indicator of where greater emphasis, effort and resources are being put.

    Frankly, before I broke out the numbers, I felt the Oline had gotten way too much money and too many draft picks. Now that I've seen the figures I've softened a bit on it, actually. It's not way out of balance.

    I'll add the extension. Good point.

    Mainly I wanted to give people some info to look at so they could decide if they felt like the regime was doing as much as it needed to at QB.
     
  9. Stringer Bell

    Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    But did anyone want that last offseason? So essentially you're saying they didn't do as much as they needed to this past offseason. Thats fair, and I somewhat agree with that. But what were their options? Its been pretty slim pickings this offseason.
     
  10. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    Yes and no....

    A different GM / Head Caoch combo might have gone for QB's higher in the drafts we had. Ryan over Long, or trade up to get Gabbert instead of Pouncey and Thomas. Stuff like that. They might have done what Andy Reid's done having Vick AND VY in the house, not resting on their laurels with one starting level talent at the position... they ALWAYS have at least two guys in Philly with that level. so a different GM/HC might have brought ANOTHER FA QB in two years ago.

    I agree pickings on QBs are always slim, but we've shown no urgency about getting to the front of that line, either.

    It's low supply, meets medium (instead of high) prioritization on our part, I think.
     
  11. FinNasty

    FinNasty Alabama don’t want this... Staff Member Club Member

    24,273
    36,114
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    To be completely fair... there was nothing in the draft for us to take by the time #15 rolled around...

    Investing in the QB position just for the sake of doing it, even if the answer isnt there... doesnt solve anything.
     
    unluckyluciano likes this.
  12. dmarino74

    dmarino74 New Member

    2
    0
    0
    Aug 4, 2011
    Let's not kid ourselves....it's not about this year. They've passed on many, many players. Admittedly, some didn't work out.....but, they're not even trying to improve at the position.....and, it's been like that for years now.
     
  13. Shamboubou

    Shamboubou Well-Known Member

    2,228
    1,004
    113
    Jan 4, 2008
    Indianapolis
    If you saying the Dolphins yes I agree we have passed on a lot of players starting from the whole Culpepper over Brees thing and forward. If you are talking about this current regiem I dont think you can really make that arguement. What sucks for us as fans is that we have been through what 4 head coach's a couple GM's 2 owners and it seems like the QB issue just continues to try and be solved by some halfazz vet that never works out.

    We have to get our next QB through the draft, hopefully we can get a 1st round talent. Sadly its going to be harder and harder because of the rookie wage scale. Teams are going to start taking chance's on QB's higher because if its a bust, then it doesn't cost as much. Thats just my opinion.
     
  14. cdz12250

    cdz12250 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    10,272
    7,928
    113
    Nov 28, 2007
    Coconut Grove
    The offensive line defines the opportunities that both the running game and the passing game get. By the same token, you can't run them (except for the Fridge, the exception that proves the rule, or gadgets like the Fumblerooski) or pass to them (except for guard and tackle eligible plays, (which, thankfully, are few and far between). So you have to have skill players, too.

    The problem is that the Fins have started building the team by building a great offensive line, but have been plagued by failures, so they're stuck in that low gear. Until they get a great OL, they're going to focus their resources on it. I'm OK with that. A great young OL is the foundation of a championship offense. Once that project is done, they start on the skill player projects. Dammit, they can't miss on every OLineman. Can they?
     
  15. Aquafin

    Aquafin New Member

    4,736
    304
    0
    Jun 16, 2011
    the poor house
    well I counted the number of qb since Dan retired and the number comes up to 28 if you include 1 st and 2nd team qb's and the number gos up to 32 if you count 3rd team guys but we also gave up on some potenialy good qbs but we never gave them a chance though.

    we never gave John Beck a chance we just threw him into the toughest game that year against a tough defense. I am the only fin fan that will say this ,but Sage , Gus, Brian, Damon and Jay and even culpepper could have succeeded but our head coaches have all been too damn conservative and Dave never gave any other qb a chance when Feilder went down , hell he threw Feidler out their in a game when his shoulder was causing so much pain that Jay ended up tearing up his shoulder worse. so when you look at our past number of qb's there is something thatmakes me sick and that is every playoff team has had a pro bowl qb while we have had zilch . am I wrong for having this observation.
     
  16. NaboCane

    NaboCane Banned

    31,949
    11,899
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    One year, they say no one worthwhile was available. The next year, they say they didn't like the guy who fell to them. The next year, they like a guy but fail to make a deal to go up and get him.

    The problem is, years become decades, and here we are—about 20 years after Marino started to decline, and a progression of duds later, and we're still talking about "next year."

    THAT'S what galls me about this.

    They can say whatever excuse they want to give, year after year, but the bottom line is: if you haven't gotten yourself a franchise passer in two decades, YOU DIDN'T TRY HARD ENOUGH. You didn't want it bad enough, or you wanted other things more...YOU DIDN'T PRIORITIZE THE POSITION TO ITS INHERENT WORTH.
     
    DolfanJake likes this.
  17. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    I agree somewhat Nabo, though I don't feel quite as strongly as you do.

    QB has not been treated as an urgent priority. A moderate one yes. Urgent, not quite.
     
  18. Phyl

    Phyl New Member

    654
    144
    0
    Dec 26, 2010
    Our ambivalence to the most important single position in all of professional sports is absolutely insane to me. The fact we never try to get a guy with our first round pick is as perplexing as it is embarrassing.
     
  19. DolfanJake

    DolfanJake Banned

    9,069
    802
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    West Miami-Dade County
    They win this year, or they are gone. I heard today ticket sales are down by almost 30% this year. Ross can't afford these guys any longer and will replace them in a heartbeat if they don't at least have the team at 9 wins and showing promise at the end of the year. He has to because of business. Many people forget that the NFL is not just entertainment, but business too. If the Dolphins aren't making Mr. Ross money the way he expects, he will fix the problem. That I am sure will mean getting rid of Sparano at the least, and maybe Ireland as well.

    Its business.
     
  20. Larryfinfan

    Larryfinfan 17-0...Priceless Club Member

    I guess you could say it's the chicken or the egg issue here. We had an offensive offensive line when Tony and co. arrived. They improved it. Then the OL digressed considerably last season. Injuries, too high expectations of certain players, etc all seemed to doom any chance of maintaining the improvement from the previous two years. I think, if the OL can regain that pop they've had and allow Thomas, Bush, et al to be productive, no one will care much.

    Unfortunately, QB is a different horse. His deficiencies are tied into several other aspects of the team...the OL, the WRs, the TEs, the backs, the scheme the offense is running. So his deficiencies may look like all of the problem when in reality these other areas are just as much to blame for failure of the team.

    That doesn't answer your post, it just points out that for every argument that is made for the lack of going after a QB, you can argue that they are justified in spending on the OL...
     
  21. finfansince72

    finfansince72 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    13,843
    10,283
    113
    Dec 18, 2007
    Columbia, South Carolina
    Well when a regime has 3-4 years and has not found a consistent starting Qb, that usually means its over for them. I don't really understand the argument that people are "glad we didn't overpay", what the hell is overpaying for a starting quality Qb? A 2nd round pick? 20 million guaranteed money? Thats the middle of the road for a starting caliber Qb.

    There are like 20-25 guys on the planet that are good starting caliber Qbs, what do you expect to pay to get one? When the Qb situation has been as bad as ours has been for as long as ours has been its time to be aggressive. The mentality that we can just wait till the next draft is ridiculous. Look at the 2 times we've picked in the top 3, there wasn't a Qb worth taking at the time (well Ryan was but thats an argument for another day). The point is when you have a guy you want and think he can play in your system you move up to get him or you trade for him and give him the money. We have basically just drafted Henne and hoped he would work out. Even if Henne had played well we still would have been smart to draft more talent to shore up the position. Some teams basically draft Qbs every year or two, we should do that as well, it only makes sense.

    We've been hoping, bargain shopping and gun shy to make a big move. Hopefully Henne can play because if he can't I think the front office and coaching staff are gone.
     
  22. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Now hold up a minute here Bpk, apples to apples, what have the Patriots and Jets invested in their Olines?
     
  23. Jaj

    Jaj Registered

    6,359
    1,671
    0
    Mar 23, 2008
    Los Angeles
    What's easier to find a good QB or a good offensive line? At this point I'd say the benefit of a great QB is greater than the offensive line and it's likely cheaper too.

    1- QB
    2- HC

    Are the two positions where you have to have excellent results otherwise you're making your job that much more difficult.
     
  24. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    I know. It makes it so hard to figure out the best way to solve the issues, and also whether the FO should be congratulated, blamed, neither or both.
     
  25. miamiron

    miamiron There's always next year

    2,354
    1,402
    113
    Jan 4, 2008
    Add to the offensive line list with

    Sir Vincent Rogers
    Al Johnson
    Dan Gore
    Julias Wilson
    Andy Alleman
    Mark Lewis
    Ickechuku Ndukwe
    Andrew Hartline
    Trey Dariek
    Jermey Parnell
    Joe Reitz
    Ray Feinga
    Dan Heerspink
    Matt Kopa
    Allen Barbre
    Lyndon Murtha
    Pat Mcquistan
    Mike Byrne
    Andrew Gardner
    Nate Garner
    Garrett Chisolm
     
  26. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    Different situations.

    The Pats already had Bledsoe (1st round pick) when they picked up Brady anyways (smart to keep putting resources into a position as important as QB, even when you have a Pro Bowler, huh! How'd that work out for them?). So the priorities/urgency are different. They were good enough to have a franchise QB already, plus still invest in the position.

    The Jets had Pennington but were ready to let him go when they gave away the farm to move up and get Sanchez. In the 1st round. They went ALL IN and were aggressive on getting their guy too. They knew they needed a QB so moved heaven and earth to get the one they wanted. Yeah, he's played poorly, but the commitment level to him created enough stability at the position that he can be a team leader. No one chanting for Orton in NY because the franchise wants it's guy, went all in for it's guy and everyone has gotten behind him.

    Only the Phins can be struggling at QB AND still not be aggressive about getting a top tier guy.

    We have done less about QB than teams who were better off at QB than we are.
     
  27. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    Sooooo, to bring that many OL guys in while we still suck at QB, and brought maybe 5 QBs through over that time makes me wonder if like we have 14 scouts focusing on OL and one scout occasionally bringing one udfa QB in each year.

    Lol.
     
  28. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    Tend to agree.
     
  29. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    One has the Jest situation a bit muddled Bro, they had Penny, and traded for Favre, then cut Penny, and released Favre after the 08 season.

    Meanwhile Mangini from 06-08 loaded them up with quality drafts (save for Gholston) whom Rex Ryan has been riding ever since.

    In 09 when they traded for Sanchez, the robbed Mangini for cheap to move up to #6 to take him, Mangini thought moving back and away from large bonuses was the wise thing to do, so much so he moved out of the #16 (Josh Freeman) for a 6th rd pick! But at that time we had Penny and Henne and looked set at Qb.

    What one does find if you dig a bit, both could have happened, build the Oline and Add the Qb, they just choose to say "no", and it is not really a question of resources they just won't make the move dating back to the yr 2000 when we drafted few Olinemen in that era.
     
  30. AdamC13

    AdamC13 Well-Known Member

    2,148
    1,398
    113
    May 3, 2010
    I want Miami to have a great QB as much as anyone. I truly miss watching Marino sling the ball every Sunday. But the reality is there has not been quality QBs to take a chance on. An argument can be made for Ryan, but take a look at how poor our OL was. Drafting a QB with the 1st pick in the draft and having a terrible OL and supporting cast killed the careers of guys like Carr, Couch...and then there were duds like Russell and Smith. Furthermore, Ryan is probably the most overrated player in football. He dumps it off more than Henne. Ryan can't throw the deep ball worth a ****...take a look at the playoff loss to Green Bay when Ryan tries to throw the deep ball.

    Besides that the young guns considered to be potential franchise QBs were long gone in the draft by the time Miami was on the clock...Stafford, Sanchez, Freeman, Bradford, Newton, Locker, Gabbert, Ponder all gone. Who did Miami pass over? No one. It is easy for fans to say the regime has not gone after QBs, but I don't seen anyone generating a list of QBs that were overlooked.

    Having said that I think getting Orton for a 3rd would have been a really wise move. But that is the only QB related move I think this regime came up short on.
     
  31. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    Thanks Pads. I did have it muddled.

    Point stands, though, that other franchises prioritize QB more constistently than us.

    B.
     
  32. Bpk

    Bpk Premium Member Luxury Box

    The 'no one was available' thing doesn't convince me. Teams trade. If it were top priority, so would we.

    It isn't.

    We don't.
     
    Phyl and NaboCane like this.
  33. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    Add Josh McCown to QBs signed as free agents. We signed him in 2008, but we traded him after we signed Penny. Turned out to be a good investment since we got a draft pick for him.
     
  34. ToddsPhins

    ToddsPhins Banned

    29,125
    7,721
    0
    Mar 15, 2009
    It's off topic, but IMO teams that draft well should have a greater advantage over the past b/c of more $ available for key FA acquisitions.
    That helps us IMO.
     
  35. finfansince72

    finfansince72 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    13,843
    10,283
    113
    Dec 18, 2007
    Columbia, South Carolina
    I agree teams that want to get a Qb get a Qb. We could have traded up fairly easily in the draft and we could have made countless moves over the last 10 years that we didn't. We've always been gunshy and bargain shopping and thats been one of the major problems. The mentality that we can build an oline and running game and just insert a mediocre Qb and win games is another issue. We talk all the time about gettting explosive on offense, getting speed, etc but we just load up on linemen, power running backs, possession wideouts and forget about upgrading at the Qb position.
     
    Phyl and NaboCane like this.
  36. Phyl

    Phyl New Member

    654
    144
    0
    Dec 26, 2010
    I think the Dolphins need to stop shopping at Ross and Marshall's and just step up and go into Nieman Marcus. The QB position is not fungible like RB, MLB, etc. That's why elite QBs never hit the open market in their prime (save Drew Brees who had a weird confluence of circumstances). I'm also sick of saying the Fins haven't had the chance to get a top-flight QB in the draft. You do what you can to get a star. The Bucs drafted Freeman with the 17th pick. Was it impossible or unthinkable to move up from the 25th to the 17th spot for a kid that looks like a future star and Ben Roethlisberger but without the rapetastic predilection? I'm hoping and praying that because of the new CBA that will keep rookie contracts under control that we'll take a chance on a QB because even if we strike out, it won't cripple the franchise for 4-5 years.

    I'm just really tired of this excuse that we never have a chance at a good QB in the draft. You can't complain about not getting a chance when you never put your hat into the ring.
     
    finfansince72 likes this.
  37. Trowa

    Trowa A world of pain

    5,790
    2,699
    113
    May 8, 2008
    [​IMG]
     
  38. rafael

    rafael Well-Known Member

    27,364
    31,261
    113
    Apr 6, 2008
    I can't criticize this regime for not going after the QB b/c I agreed with many of their choices to pass on the QBs that were potentially available. I just didn't feel they were the worth the investment. Now I can and have criticized past regimes for not prioritizing the QB position. It seems silly and frankly just irrational to blame them for 20 years when they weren't even around.
     
    unluckyluciano likes this.
  39. The_Dark_Knight

    The_Dark_Knight Defender of the Truth

    11,839
    10,343
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    Rockledge, FL
    Listen, building an offense is like building a house. You don't first put in plumbing or electrial or the walls or the roof without first building the foundation. In building an offense, the first thing that MUST be built is that offensive line. Not every running back in the league is a Barry Sanders, nor every quarterback a Michael Vick. Without that base, it doesn't matter who you have in the backfield, they're going to get destroyed. Teams with talented offensive lines, even with medicore talent in the backfield have won and some winning championships.

    Redskins
    Cowboys
    Raiders
    Ravens
    Panthers
    Chiefs
    Chargers

    Teams that have/had SOLID offensive lines and some of them with medicore talent in the back field yet, were/are successful

    The offensive line is your most fundamental base. Miami has a good solid base. Miami should see tangible success running the ball and with the ability to protect the quarterback, Chad Henne won't be as rushed to throw the ball as he was last year.

    Now, provided the OL holds up this year and is not plagued by injury, provided that Henne isn't scrambling like a chicken with his head cut off, he should see much imporved success than he had last year. If he doesn't and the OL proved reliable, then it's time to grab our QB of the future in next year's draft and find a good veteran quarterback to play backup and be his mentor.

    It used to be once upon a time before free agency, you could build a good solid team that was perinneal playoff contenders within a few years. With free agency, it's hit and miss. When you get a hit by signing a big name free agent, you inevitably lose one to free agency.

    THIS season right here is going to tell whether or not the Dolphins are indeed on the right track.
     
  40. Phyl

    Phyl New Member

    654
    144
    0
    Dec 26, 2010
    As a counterpoint, there are plenty of teams with middle of the road offensive lines that have excellent QBs that have achieved great amounts of success. Pittsburgh, Green Bay, and New Orleans come to mind immediately. Obviously, if the choice is between a good offensive line and a not good offensive line, I'll take the good offensive line, but if I had the choice between a star QB and a mid-pack OL or a great OL and a mid-pack QB, I'll take the former over the latter any day of the week and twice on Sunday. What did our awesome offensive line achieve for us in 2009? A 7-9 record? Whooopeedoo.

    I've grown really tired of watching the same brand of mediocre football for the past 15 years.
     

Share This Page