1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Devil's Advocate Argument against signing Carson Palmer:

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by ToddsPhins, Dec 31, 2010.

  1. ToddsPhins

    ToddsPhins Banned

    29,125
    7,721
    0
    Mar 15, 2009
    In a perfect world, this regime would have our ground game gaining 4 yards every first down to keep us in our conservative, low-risk, high percentage passing game approach. IMO that's how we should be looking at our QBs: how they would perform if our offense is working to the desired game plan.

    To me that means, looking at a QB's 1st down performance, 2nd & 7 or less yards, 3rd and 3-7 yards, and redzone b/c these are the situations we need to be in for this offense to really thrive. I grabbed the closest stats that are available.

    Here's Carson compared to what we currently have. It could be argued that statistically (through almost an entire season) that Henne is better suited for "our" offense if <and when> we have a ground game that's picking up positive yards on 1st down like we aspire for.

    1st down
    Palmer: 85 QB Rating, 61%, 7.2 ave, 10 TDs, 7 INTs, 29% 1st downs per attempt, 1538 yards
    Henne: 89 QB Rating, 68%, 8.4 ave, 5 TDs, 6 INTs, 34% 1st downs per attempt, 1478 yards

    2nd & <6
    Palmer: 128 QB Rating, 69%, 7.0 ave, 5 TDs, 0 INTs, 67% 1st downs
    Henne: 107 QB Rating, 75%, 6.9 ave, 1 TD, 0 INTS, 71% 1st downs

    3rd & 3-7
    Palmer: 79 QB Rating, 57%, 5.2 ave, 4 TDs, 2 INTs, 38% 1st downs
    Henne: 119 QB Rating, 70%, 8.1 ave, 4 TDs, 0 INTs, 63% 1st downs

    Redzone
    Palmer: 86 QB Rating, 54%, 18 TDs, 2 INTs, 29% TDs per attempt
    Henne: 89 QB Rating, 57%, 10 TDs, 2 INTs, 22% TDs

    Trailing by 7 pts or less
    Palmer: 60 QB Rating, 52%, 5.0 ave, 3 TDs, 4 INTs, 26% 1st downs, 576 yards
    Henne: 90 QB Rating, 67%, 7.3 ave, 5 TDs, 3 INTs, 36% 1st downs, 1437 yards

    Again, this is a Devil's advocate argument. Feel free to discuss.

    Added consideration:
    # of injuries
    Henne: 1
    Palmer: 89 (I'm not a fan of signing a guy who has a higher amount of injuries than QB rating.... just sayin)
     
  2. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    53,151
    31,936
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Katy, TX
    I still think we can be successful with Henne if he wins the starting job next year, but regardless of the #'s I'd be more comfortable going into next year with Palmer at QB.
     
  3. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Well, the thing with Palmer is adding TO was simply terrible for his play.

    I'd prefer Kyle Orton over Palmer, but either way "if" Sparano survives heading into 2011 with Henne at the helm is just coaching suicide, sure Henne may turn it around, but we cannot know that will happen.
     
    gunn34 likes this.
  4. the 23rd

    the 23rd a.k.a. Rio

    9,173
    2,398
    113
    Apr 20, 2009
    Tampa Area
    Orton or Palmer over the henne
     
  5. ToddsPhins

    ToddsPhins Banned

    29,125
    7,721
    0
    Mar 15, 2009
    I think I'd rather have Orton to compete with Henne, too, if we're bringing in a vet.
     
  6. ToddsPhins

    ToddsPhins Banned

    29,125
    7,721
    0
    Mar 15, 2009
    I'd probably be more comfortable with Carson starting the season, but I might be more comfortable with Henne over Palmer after Henne has 6-8 games under his belt and has settled in. I like Henne's upside here more based on our current offensive philosophy.
     
  7. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    53,151
    31,936
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Katy, TX
    I like Henne's upside too, but Palmer seems like he would be able to come in right away and "click." I don't feel the same about Orton.

    I'm much more of a Palmer fan than Orton.
     
  8. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Well, the thing with Palmer is we'd also have to shed some guys to pay for his salary, his 10.5 millie (have heard 9.5 bonus and 2 in salary) would have to come from somewhere..ala Crowder and Carey and the savings from trading the draft pick.

    I've been seriously thinking about looking into a thread that hinges on the "Who" Ireland could sign cheaply and would help from Day 1 as "if" Sparano is kept, to then just write the checks seems unlikely to happen so Irish will have to hit the bargain bin as Soliai and McD and Richie I are all also up for new contracts..how much cash is there to go around to sign them?

    Trading for Palmer should also be looked at from a financial point of view and how it would effect the entire roster.
     
  9. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    I just think Orton has some Drew Brees in him.

    As for TP's premise, that is one of the problems with Stats, they tell a part of the story, not the whole story, for example Palmer has 11 int's on targets of TO..11...
     
  10. ToddsPhins

    ToddsPhins Banned

    29,125
    7,721
    0
    Mar 15, 2009
    If Palmer checks out health wise and his mechanics and velocity are back to the Palmer of old, then I'd rather have Carson than Orton....... but if his injuries are still affecting his ability to throw the ball like he used to, then I'd prefer Kyle.
     
  11. ToddsPhins

    ToddsPhins Banned

    29,125
    7,721
    0
    Mar 15, 2009
    Ummmm...... for 10.5 million I'd rather have Mankins, with the leftover going toward Ahmad Bradshaw and staying with Henne..... while keeping the 1st and trying to parlay it into an extra pick.
     
  12. ToddsPhins

    ToddsPhins Banned

    29,125
    7,721
    0
    Mar 15, 2009
    Does Mrs. Brees know this? :dunno: Maybe she likes that sort of thing...... maybe they swing with the Ryan's. :lol:
     
  13. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    If you do not have a Qb, you have nothing, everything else pales in importance, the Dolphins have learned this lesson the hard way.

    And the patriots do not allow their top talent to walk without grabbing some draft picks for them, Mankins is the #2 fantasy behind Andrew Luck.
     
  14. ToddsPhins

    ToddsPhins Banned

    29,125
    7,721
    0
    Mar 15, 2009
    What's to say he doesn't have the same problem with high profile Marshall? The stats don't account for Henne's half a dozen BS INTs from tipped passes etc.
     
  15. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    BM is nothing like TO for a start, secondly Palmer is also not adverse to throwing the ball up for a Wr to go get which would make BM more effective in the red zone imho.

    I prefer Orton simply because he is younger, has no history of catastrophic injuries and has a lesser dollar amount attached to his contract, though it would make sense to package Henne in a trade for Palmer, the Broncos would figure to have no interest in Henne.
     
  16. Fin-Omenal

    Fin-Omenal Initiated

    36,936
    10,264
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Thee...Ohio State University
    Sorry fellas but I feel your underestimating Palmer big time. Sure he has had some issues but he has been in the soap opera that is Cinncy....there isn't a throw he can't make or a system he can't flourish in.
     
  17. Frayser

    Frayser Barstool Philosopher

    9,545
    5,217
    113
    Dec 4, 2007
    Atlanta, GA
    And I think that's a very reasonable position. The only issues I would really have with that are 1) how much do we have to pay him and 2) what if Henne beats him out. But I can understand the appeal of Palmer.

    I honestly think Henne will have a good offseason. When all is said and done, I still think he progressed this season rather than regressed. If he had been given any help whatsoever on offense over the course of the season, I really don't think his or our numbers would look nearly as bad. We won some tough games this season, and we lost some tough games this season. And teams that were supposed to be cupcakes ended up surprising. All in all, I'm not all that down on how things went considering we are 1) tied for 28th in rushing TDs with 8 and 2) tied for 30th in takeaways. I consider those to be two very important stats for our team. We failed miserably at both of them.

    I think the turnovers will work itself out. We're talking about a Top 5 defense that can best be described as a hatchling at the moment, both in terms of youth in personnel and in terms of time in Mike Nolan's system. The experience, confidence, and discipline will get there. I trust that. Where I think we need a more drastic approach is in the run game. Get the line sorted out. Get some speed (Kory Sheets?). And get a new stud with younger legs than Brown and Williams (Mark Ingram?).

    And I hope we move on a new OC early. I want someone in there early who can immediately be working with Henne and later with Palmer or whoever else is ultimately brought in to compete.
     
  18. NFL2102

    NFL2102 New Member

    1,142
    142
    0
    Oct 4, 2010
    Didn't Orton specifically say he wants to go to a team where he will be a starter no doubt?
    I bet Palmer would be the same.
     
  19. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    53,151
    31,936
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Katy, TX
    I don't have an issue with either. If Henne wins out, that would be a good position for us. As to #1, I would only be concerned about it if #2 came to fruition.

    My main concern would be how would we acquire him. Ideally Cincy won't want his contract, and they cut him loose. However, I'd imagine they'd try and trade him for something before that happens.
     
  20. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    53,151
    31,936
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Katy, TX
    That's how I feel about him.

    Give him a good running game here (not what we had this year), and I have very little doubt he'd make us into a contender.
     
  21. GreysonWinfield

    GreysonWinfield Release The Hounds

    3,982
    1,434
    113
    Nov 1, 2009
    I really don't want to see Palmer. Orton in a heartbeat.
     
  22. Fin-Omenal

    Fin-Omenal Initiated

    36,936
    10,264
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Thee...Ohio State University
    Orton looked bad before Mcdaniels, not to say he sucks but the system was good
     
  23. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    53,151
    31,936
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Katy, TX
    This is one reason McDaniels is my #1 want as OC. I think he could help our QB situation a ton (same for Charlie Weis) regardless of how much talent we may actually have back there (for the record I think we have a passable amount).
     
  24. Frayser

    Frayser Barstool Philosopher

    9,545
    5,217
    113
    Dec 4, 2007
    Atlanta, GA
    http://forums.thephins.com/showthread.php?52862-2011-draft-prospects&p=1379777&viewfull=1#post1379777

    Tough to know how I feel about that so far out from the draft, but if it were to cost us Ingram, for instance, I'd hope that we really got a damn good football player in the 2nd. It seems to be a pretty crap year for TEs. So maybe we grab one of those WRs for our new OC who happens to like 3 and 4 WR sets? Or is there a RB that I could stomach, even with my man crush on Ingram? Maybe.
     
  25. uab_phin

    uab_phin New Member

    284
    97
    0
    Dec 13, 2010
    I really think that you're thinking of the old Palmer because that just isn't true anymore. I think at this point he wouldn't give us an arm much stronger than Pennington's in 2008, which most complained about. If you watch palmers throws to the sidelines there's just way too much air under them.

    Bottomline I would gladly have the old Palmer, but this new version is really underwhelming.
     
  26. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Well, we can think Palmer will be traded, but if there is a shake up in Cinci, the new HC may want him, Orton is sure to be traded as Denver is in full on Rebuilding mode and they have Tebow already.

    Either way though, I do not value draft picks as much as I value solutions, whomever they go after I desire no excuses to be made, just land the solution and do not over value the draft choices or contract it takes to get it done.

    my .02, we should package Henne and our 1st for the bengals 2nd and a 5th if they identify Palmer as "the guy", resign Thigpen, draft a developmental Qb though truth be told Brandstater is an interesting prospect imho.

    Bengals would receive:

    -Starting Qb while Cam Newton develops
    -second #1 pick
    -Palmer's contract is off of the books

    Dolphins would receive:

    -Starting caliber Qb
    -basically a late #1 pick as once you get around pick #29 there is not a whole lot of difference in talent between the #29 pick and the #37 pick the bengals have.
     
  27. uab_phin

    uab_phin New Member

    284
    97
    0
    Dec 13, 2010
    Does your desire to have McDaniels override your desire to have Nolan, or to keep Marshall well behaved? Not saying that either of these things would be affected, but it's certainly a possibility.
     
  28. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    53,151
    31,936
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Katy, TX
    I'd rather have Nolan and Marshall than McDaniels, but the two don't seem at all mutually exclusive.
     
  29. uab_phin

    uab_phin New Member

    284
    97
    0
    Dec 13, 2010
    You really can't see why nolan and Marshall wouldn't want to work with mcDaniels again?
     
  30. Fin-Omenal

    Fin-Omenal Initiated

    36,936
    10,264
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Thee...Ohio State University
    I'm sure his firing has humbled him, matters not because he will be in KC.
     
  31. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    53,151
    31,936
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Katy, TX
    I could see why people bring it up, but I don't see anything that says it couldn't work. Nolan's problem seemingly was working for McDaniels (which he wouldn't be doing here). Marshall by all accounts enjoyed actually playing for McDaniels and in that offense, he was upset about his contract however.
     
  32. Garryowen

    Garryowen New Member

    1,046
    243
    0
    Nov 26, 2007
    I didn't know thee was a "Devils" side to play in not signing Palmer.

    Please god, no to Palmer.
     
  33. gunn34

    gunn34 I miss Don & Dan

    21,755
    3,475
    113
    Jan 5, 2008
    Oviedo FL
    That would be the case here. You have seen what henne can and can't do. He has been the same QB for the last 7 years.

    My question is what makes anyone think Cincy is getting rid of Palmer? Who do they have to replace him? Did they say he's gone?

    Orton in Denver I can see because of Tebow. Especially if Tebow beats SD tomorrow. Possibly even seeing Washington saying goodbye to McNabb.
     
  34. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/O/OrtoKy00.htm

    Interesting thing about Orton, each of the last 3 yrs his Td to int ratio has improved, starting in Chicago.


    Brown apparently is going to blow up his Cinci Team.
     
  35. RoninFin4

    RoninFin4 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    23,730
    44,887
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Rumor in town is that Bob Bratkowski, the current offensive coordinator is the top candidate for the presumed HC vacancy (if Marvin Lewis leaves which at this point all signs point to him being gone), which I think would keep Palmer around. But even that doesn't matter as ultimately the decision is going to rest with Mike Brown, who already loves Carson, and Carson might have just played his way into sticking around in Cincinnati regardless of his salary.

    As for the shakeup, the most talked about names of players that will be gone, or won't be re-signed are:

    Cedric Benson
    Terrell Owens
    Chad Ochocinco
    Dhani Jones
    Andre Smith
    Robert Geathers
     
  36. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    53,151
    31,936
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Katy, TX
    It's pure speculation at this point really. Carson has like the highest QB salary going into next year, and the owner is pretty notoriously cheap. Factor that in with the product on the field, and why would they pay so much when they could likely win just as many games (or close) with someone much cheaper at QB.
     
  37. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Hmm, would not surprise me if Zimmer is bumped over Bratkowski.

    My theory for this move is:

    Mike Brown will draft Cam Newton making Qb the most expensive position on his team and he will try to avoid that situation via trading Palmer and finding a Veteran to play who can play care taker whilst Newton learns the rudiments of a NFL offense, that is where Chad Henne steps in.
     
  38. Frayser

    Frayser Barstool Philosopher

    9,545
    5,217
    113
    Dec 4, 2007
    Atlanta, GA
    Nineteen teams in the NFL are currently averaging 4 or more yards per carry. Nineteen. And I'm pretty sure all of them still pass the ball. So . . . yeah. Great point.
     
    ToddsPhins likes this.
  39. RoninFin4

    RoninFin4 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    23,730
    44,887
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Bratkowski has been in Cincinnati the longest of their assistants. The other hot name is Hue Jackson, the current Raiders OC, who was the Bengals WR coach in 2004-06 (might have those years wrong, but he was here). That's just how Brown has traditionally operated, and Bratkowski is more apt to play good soldier. Brown views being a head coach in the NFL as "there's only 32 guys who have this job, be fortunate you have it" rather than doing what needs to be done to help that coach succeed.

    As for drafting Newton, I just don't see it. Not in Cincinnati and not the way Brown operates. I think he'll do whatever it takes to keep Carson, barring hell freezing over and Brown relinquishing control of football operations to a GM or HC. It'd have to be a pretty sweet trade for him to do it. He loves Carson.
     
  40. uab_phin

    uab_phin New Member

    284
    97
    0
    Dec 13, 2010
    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4788055

    If you remember Brandon Marshall and McDaniels squared off on issues outside of strictly contractual stuff.
     

Share This Page