Separate names with a comma.
I posted that players "LOOK" slow with black cleats....like everyone in the 60s , early 70s..and yes, I am a foot racist. :tongue2: Actually,...
Wow. That looks 'turrible'. Black cleats make players look slow. 1960's slow. Thank god for Billy "White Shoes" Johnson.
That and he was wearing the wrong pants with THAT jersey. If it's the same jersey as in that "right-here, right now" video, it's the '93 version...
Pic kinda mirrors your "Slam Dunk" sig.
When I saw the smoke clear, I said the same thing :yes:.....then I saw aqua socks :no:. Those needed to be striped.
OR....you can just look at the Jaguars uniform and squint.
For the love of everything that is sacred...IT'S NOT BLACK!!!!
I'm sure the fans "love it" as well. :shifty:
I'm a fan as well. If they decide to give us an alternate with aqua pants, the socks must have stripes. None of this...
It's not black. Just take a look at KillerBees' avatar. That navy blue on the previous design LOOKS black but we all know it's not. It's not so...
Yeah but so unoriginal. Let's be like the Ravens/Steelers/Eagles/Bengals/Jaguars/Lions/Falcons/Panthers/raiders/saints/Cards.......no thanks.
Yup. They've only abandoned that look in 91 & 92, so I'd say it's pretty much a staple. I would like to see them also add the aqua pants though....
That's black?? Too me it's just a bad quality pic that makes the blue look a lot darker than it is. Just like in some pictures, the '97-'12 looks...
Yikes. That's gonna look terrible. Almost as bad as Dwight Howard when he wears that black undershirt with Laker Purple or yellow.
I'm with you. Black makes no sense. Things don't need black outlines. Too many teams have black already, and don't give me that "all teams wear...
