It sure does sound like Armano is taking liberties with his blog. His blog today has some information about Hakeem Nicks that certainly sounds alot like a draft blog on the Sun Sentinel that we all know. You be the judge, but shouldn't he at least give credit where credit is due. I especially like the part about Nicks stepping up his game when Tate went down. http://miamiherald.typepad.com/dolp...t-order-and-what-the-picks-need-to-bring.html http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/spo...log/2009/03/london_calling_draft_winds_7.html
I dunno. I read Boomer's analysis. They both make the same point about Nicks' production improving. Nymike, you might want to look at a few draft site's scouting reports for Nicks. Do they all mention this "stepping up" when Tate went down? I would think this is common knowledge among draft experts. I don't like Armando either, for what its worth.
this is exactly what he wants.. someone to create a thread, and he gets a bunch of traffic. If he doesn't get the traffic, he will stop the crap.
Yep, I don't read ANY of them anymore. Unless you see an article headline that insinuates REAL NEWS or interviews of players or staff you can have full confidence that the article is crap coming from our S. FL. "sports journalists" and that you're missing absolutely nothing by not reading their babble. You get more insight coming here and talking to educated fans.
Of course, if everyone would stop reading the written diarrhea that comes from this clown maybe he would go away for good. I can't remember the last time I read an article he wrote. Sometimes I will click on a link from here only to see it's an Armando article. I just hit the X button immediately.
