Tim Tebow

Discussion in 'NFL Draft Forum' started by Boomer, Nov 25, 2008.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. phunwin

    phunwin Happy kids are Dolfans. Luxury Box

    I think Tebow is one of the most fascinating draft prospects I've ever seen. I'm prepared for anything with him, from "cut in training camp" to "10 time All Pro QB". His delivery needs (a lot of) work, but he's got a good enough arm, he's got a good head on his shoulders, and is certainly plenty athletic. But he's way too big to play running back, and I don't think he has the quickness to play WR. He's got the body of a tight end, really, but you can probably count the number of blocks he's thrown on one hand.

    I like everything you said, except for the term "x-factor". I hate that term. An x-factor, by definition, is undefinable. And yet, I digress...

    White in round 3 or 4 would be something I'm not at all opposed to. Maybe he'd be the new "Slash", before Kordell Stewart got a big head and figured he could be a full time QB. However, White strikes me as something of a luxury pick for a front office that I think is still going to be looking for the proverbial meat and potatoes picks in this draft. I personally expect another draft that's heavy with front seven defenders and offensive linemen, and light on flash and dash.
     
  2. BuckeyeKing

    BuckeyeKing Wolves DYNASTY!!!!

    25,411
    5,743
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    Tebow isn't quick enough to run the "wildcat"

    He would get rocked quick.
     
  3. Big E

    Big E Plus sized porn star

    31,885
    8,682
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Bloomington, IN.
    He'll get rocked period. No matter what he runs. Grossman jr..........
     
  4. BuckeyeKing

    BuckeyeKing Wolves DYNASTY!!!!

    25,411
    5,743
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    Kinda looks like him too :tongue2:
     
  5. funkdat

    funkdat New Member

    1,461
    350
    0
    Dec 12, 2007
    The post funk era
    Well we all know he's not going to run a 4.4 and it really doesn't matter if he run's under a 4.7 cuzz he doesn't play that fast.

    In 06 i wasn't sold on him at all but after last year and this year........wow............ i think if a team drafts him and lets him play QB the way he wants "that means him playing with the gator's playbook" then i think he'll do just fine in the nfl.

    For the life of me, i don't know why any one wouldn't want that cuzz the guy is awesome to watch play.
     
  6. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    54,033
    33,761
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Spring, TX
    Because NFL defenses are too good for that playbook to work, especially with Tebow back there considering his mechanics/footwork/long delivery.

    You can't out-athlete people in the NFL for a majority of the season.
     
    Boomer and Big E like this.
  7. Big E

    Big E Plus sized porn star

    31,885
    8,682
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Bloomington, IN.
    He's not an athlete compared to some of the guys he will be facing, which is the problem. The first time he tries to run over Shawne Merriman, or someone like that he's going to end up flat on his back counting little birdies.
     
  8. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    54,033
    33,761
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Spring, TX
    I meant you can't out-athlete people in regards to the teammates he has at Florida. :up:
     
    Big E likes this.
  9. funkdat

    funkdat New Member

    1,461
    350
    0
    Dec 12, 2007
    The post funk era
    Well we'll only know if a team drafts him and lets him do what he does.

    I find it hard to believe a dolfan would say anything about a center kind of playbook not working when we use "The Wildcat "lol.

    He could take a step like he's going to run every play just like he does now, and even if he only ran it 3 or 5 times a game it would still mess with the DL mind and buy him more time to look down the field.

    As far as his mechanics/footwork/long delivery.......you could say that about just about any QB coming out of college, but i don't see the footwork or long delivery,,,,, i do see his mechanics being a prb but every QB can get better in some part of their game.

    He has a better completion percentage then Matt Ryan did and Matthew Stafford has.That's really all i need to know about his mechanics,footwork and delivery.

    anyways like i said we won't know tell a team drafts him and let's him play his game so there is really no point in going back in forth so I'll agree to disagree.:up:
     
    jim1 likes this.
  10. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    54,033
    33,761
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Spring, TX
    My normal sarcastic reply to this would get me in trouble, so I will merely say I am glad you are not a scout for the dolphins.
     
  11. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    54,033
    33,761
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Spring, TX
    Also, the wildcat is merely one package in our playbook, you want whatever team drafts Tebow to have him run Florida's playbook. That is a HUGE jump from a package to a playbook, like 30 plays versus 150+ plays.
     
  12. funkdat

    funkdat New Member

    1,461
    350
    0
    Dec 12, 2007
    The post funk era
    Come on bro don't wimp out, lol

    If i was a Scout i'd place a 3 round grade on Tim, and not want him to start for 2 or 3 years.

    But since we have the Chad's i would only take him in the 4th or 5th round.
     
  13. funkdat

    funkdat New Member

    1,461
    350
    0
    Dec 12, 2007
    The post funk era
    I don't think you'll get this but my point is the wildcat works, it doesn't matter how lil or how much they use it, it works.

    LOL you think we only have 150 plays in are play book, Thanks man, i needed that.
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2008
  14. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    54,033
    33,761
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Spring, TX
    I thought/think most college teams average around 150 offensive plays in their playbook, yes.
     
  15. Boomer

    Boomer Premium Member Luxury Box

    22,623
    50,063
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    Except that's simply not the case. This is just utter conjecture based on nothing at all factual.

    Remind me again how mechanics, footwork and delivery have anything to do with completion percentage? And remind me again how a rinky dink spread offense correlates completion percentage with regards Ryan and Stafford's completion percentages in pro offences that Jagodzinski and Richt run in BC and Athens? On your assumption, can we then take it that Zac Robinson, Sam Bradford, Chase Clement, Chase Daniel, Nate Davis, Graham Harrell, Kellen Moore, Case Keenum, Max Hall, Joe Ganz, Tim Hillier, Brian Johnson, Todd Reesing, Dan LeFevour, Chase Holbrook and Tyler Sheehan are all better pro prospects given that they have superior completion percentages to Tim Tebow?
     
  16. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Boomer, is a guy like Tebow the sort who can switch over to play Safety in the NFL? Scott Frost did it with mixed success for the Jets, but it has been done successfully before.

    As for Tebow the Qb, he is sort of like Vince Young, without the quick read ability..
     
  17. alen1

    alen1 New Member

    52,811
    20,365
    0
    Dec 16, 2007
    I realize this post is directed to Boomer but Tebow would have a lot to learn. He would also be too slow for a Safety, no? Especially if he runs in the 4.7.

    And the elusiveness IMO.
     
  18. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    54,033
    33,761
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Spring, TX
    I'm a bit bias, but I think the bolded ones are better prospects as of right now. :lol:
     
  19. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    That is the sort of thing that will have to wait for the Combine though Alen, anyone who would take a shot at drafting him and moving him is not going to spend a high pick anyway.

    Or Young's computer like ability to dissect a defense and hit the open man..
     
  20. Boomer

    Boomer Premium Member Luxury Box

    22,623
    50,063
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    I don't believe so. I think he'd be too slow and you'd be asking him to learn a position that he's never played before and compete for a roster spot against guys that have been playing safety since high school and understand the positional nuances.

    Re: Vince Young......Young was more elusive as a runner, in that Tim isn't scared to take a guy on, but it's one thing taking Rashad Johnson on head first, another doing it against Troy Polamalu. As a passer, well I didn't think Young could pass a hoot, so.......
     
    padre31 likes this.
  21. Boomer

    Boomer Premium Member Luxury Box

    22,623
    50,063
    113
    Nov 30, 2007

    Nate Davis is a very interesting name on that list. As is Graham Harrell. Interesting that Harrell and Tebow run spread offenses, yet Harrell is a much better "quarterback", excellent technique, good footwork, good field vision, throws tremendously catcheable balls, good release point, works his progressions well, etc. But plays for Texas Tech and doesn't get the pub.

    Tebow runs a spread offense with half the quarterbacking ability in terms of what the NFL looks for, but is the pick du jour because he gets a lot of national exposure.

    I know who I'd be drafting first.
     
  22. alen1

    alen1 New Member

    52,811
    20,365
    0
    Dec 16, 2007
    Your right, we will have to see. Watching him though, I don't know about him moving to Safety. He's not exactly quick nor is he fast. The problem is that he's going to be playing a new position if he moves there, as Boom just said. Your going to be asking him to do several new things which is difficult. He played LB for one year at a Christian Academy but that's about it as far as playing defense. Who knows if he was just asked to run downhill and get to the QB at that time.
     
  23. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Well, for myself, I'd not draft a Florida Qb with the offense they run, they are too far behind the learning curve that a NFL offense requires (which to me is also one of John Beck's problems).

    To me, if he isn't drafted with the intention to move him, he may not be drafted, or he may be a throwaway draft pick..harsh but true..
     
  24. alen1

    alen1 New Member

    52,811
    20,365
    0
    Dec 16, 2007
    No offense to Gator fans but I wouldn't touch a Gator QB. I'm not big on Tebow but he'll be drafted. I think a GM will take a chance on him, for sure. Question is, how early does he go? I read Peter Kings take on Tebow this morning on SI.com and he said around the league circles, some OC's are high on him as an NFL QB. I wouldn't take him before the late second or third round, if that but some feel different about that.

    Problem is that I thought about him possibly moving to TE or FB. I don't know if he could do that either. I mean,your going to ask him to run routes at TE and then catch the ball as well as protect in pass and run plays at FB. Can he do that? Honestly, I'm not sure and I'm not being bias here because I hope he succeeds. He's a great character, he's very intelligent but I am not high on him.
     
  25. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    54,033
    33,761
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Spring, TX
    Can you believe he doesn't grip the ball by the laces and can still gun it like he does?
     
  26. Boomer

    Boomer Premium Member Luxury Box

    22,623
    50,063
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    I know. And he really does have a cannon.
     
  27. Stitches

    Stitches ThePhin's Biggest Killjoy Luxury Box

    54,033
    33,761
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Spring, TX
    No joke. I am a big LeFevour fan, but I have been far more impressed this year with Davis (to be fair Dan has been injured). I thought he was good when I got to see him at Akron, but I really thought he stepped up this year (especially considering their best offensive player was lost at Indiana).

    Tim Hiller looks like he might have a good chance in the league too IMO.
     
  28. funkdat

    funkdat New Member

    1,461
    350
    0
    Dec 12, 2007
    The post funk era
    jim1 likes this.
  29. funkdat

    funkdat New Member

    1,461
    350
    0
    Dec 12, 2007
    The post funk era
    Post 105 and 106.............lol

    Nice, time for me to stop posting in this thread.
     
  30. BuckeyeKing

    BuckeyeKing Wolves DYNASTY!!!!

    25,411
    5,743
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    Very risky but overall feels more comfortable.
     
  31. jim1

    jim1 New Member

    5,902
    3,054
    0
    Jul 1, 2008
    Good points. There's no equation that good footwork and mechanics equals NFL success. The same goes for big arms- take your pick, Jim Druckenmiller, Heath Shuler, Ryan Leaf, Andre Ware, Chuck Long, etcetera, ectetera, etcetera. Ken O'Brien, Todd Blackledge, Tony Eason in 1983 all had good qualities as well and were taken ahead of Marino and yet they paled in comparison- where was the magic formula back then? A virtual wasteland of failed QB's. Did they fail because they lacked NFL arms and good footwork? Footwork? Please.

    All this focusing on the relatively small stuff- I could give a rat's ***. So Tebow operates out of the shotgun a lot- big deal. Doesn't Sam Bradford as well? Where are the critics on this board saying that Bradford will fail because he can't learn and adapt to playing more under center? Brother please.

    I watch Tebow and I see a big, mobile QB with maybe unparalleled intangibles, a solid arm in my estimation- at least solid enough and a delivery that's not nearly as bad as some claim- and a pure winner. Like he can't be taught better footwork- sure, whatever.

    There's no magic formula, no matter what bs you may hear- about studies showing who will fail or succeed based upon things like footwork. He's a smart kid, he'll learn. The question is do you focus on the big stuff or relatively minor details? If there were a tennis draft years ago by I could see it now: Bjorn Borg- "well, I like the guy, but he doesn't have a killer serve. His volleying sucks, too- I wouldn't touch him until the 4th round."

    We'll find out in a few months what the real pro scouts, not the basement wannabees, think about Tim Tebow and his pro potential.
     
    funkdat likes this.
  32. jim1

    jim1 New Member

    5,902
    3,054
    0
    Jul 1, 2008
    p.s. There's always a flip side, and I'm not one to say that I'm right and others are wrong. I just give my opinion and I've been wrong plenty of times before, enough that I've learned not to be so sure of myself. I just think that Tebow is underrated and can make it as a pro QB- as always, just an online opinion. Nonetheless, here's the opinion of Scott Wright from Draft Countdown, and it isn't pretty:

    Draft Countdown - Ask Scott | 12/10/08
     
    funkdat likes this.
  33. cnc66

    cnc66 wiley veteran, bad spelur Luxury Box

    31,582
    17,137
    0
    Nov 23, 2007
    be nice fella's.. no need to get all rammy here.
     
  34. Boomer

    Boomer Premium Member Luxury Box

    22,623
    50,063
    113
    Nov 30, 2007

    There we have it. Close the draft forum.
     
  35. Boomer

    Boomer Premium Member Luxury Box

    22,623
    50,063
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    If you can't see the differences between Bradford and Tebow, well........
     
  36. jim1

    jim1 New Member

    5,902
    3,054
    0
    Jul 1, 2008
    To put in in perspective, I think that Tebow is a damn good player and has a good shot in the NFL as a QB- but the word that comes to mind when watching McCoy and Harrell is "wow". McCoy had a ton of touchdowns, a completion percentage around 80%, and has some serious wheels on him- impressive to say the least. He throws well on the move and he snaps out a good, crisp throw. Harrell- I look at him and see a lot of the same things. I'm curious to see where he goes, and he could be a 2nd-4th round steal. Bradford- he has more yards and TD's than any of them and is a stud. I wnat to watch him closely against the Gators. I think that McCoy stands out the most for me and Harrell might end up being the steal of the litter.
     
  37. Boomer

    Boomer Premium Member Luxury Box

    22,623
    50,063
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    I agree with all that other than the "good" part. I think he has a shot, but he need a hell of a lot of work.
     
  38. jim1

    jim1 New Member

    5,902
    3,054
    0
    Jul 1, 2008
    I have no problem with that. Whatever happens with Tebow, from where he's drafted to how he does in the pros- is going to be interesting. I think that he'll live and die as a Quarterback- I don't see a move to FB or TE in the cards.
     
    funkdat likes this.
  39. Boomer

    Boomer Premium Member Luxury Box

    22,623
    50,063
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    Again, clearly you didn't read what I said.

    You've been harping on about mechanics and footwork having nothing to do with anything. Shane cut it down to its basest limit and said he had a shot, which he does.
     
  40. Boomer

    Boomer Premium Member Luxury Box

    22,623
    50,063
    113
    Nov 30, 2007

    I agree with that as well. I don't see any positional changes and I think he's one of the more fascinating characters in college football in this or any year in terms of draftability. Hopefully, if the noises we're hearing out of Gainesville are to be believed, this is an issue that will probably regain force for the 2010 draft.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page