2014 Betting Thread

Discussion in 'Other Sports Forum' started by finyank13, Apr 29, 2014.

  1. byroan

    byroan Giggity Staff Member Administrator Luxury Box

    28,945
    49,388
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    NC
    Probably gonna regret it but I'm going with the better QB.

    Colts -2
     
  2. byroan

    byroan Giggity Staff Member Administrator Luxury Box

    28,945
    49,388
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    NC
    So far so good.

    Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
     
  3. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Not gonna regret it at all. Whichever team has the advantage is CRUSHING the other side on Thursday night. Tonight will be no different.

    The problem is that people want to see it as being just the home team having the advantage and so one of the games doesn't quite fit. But that's not what it's all about. It's about which team was in good position to have an advantage heading into the game. Did everyone predict that the Giants would be the better team against the Redskins? No. But in hindsight, as we watched Week 5, we can see they certainly were.

    We don't have the benefit of hindsight in looking at the Colts and Texans. But do we need it? I don't think so. I'm pretty sure that not only is Indy the better team, they're currently PLAYING like a good team...while Houston is starting to peter out after an unnatural start relative to their talent level.
     
  4. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Houston special teams a no show today :|
     
  5. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    This is definitely going over 47..
     
  6. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Hmm...well, I'm living dangerously. After they went up 10-0, I hammered Under 51.5.

    I just think the Colts are going to abuse the Texans tonight and eventually Indy will stop scoring. I'm thinking like a 34-10 final or something.
     
  7. byroan

    byroan Giggity Staff Member Administrator Luxury Box

    28,945
    49,388
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    NC
    Boy, Thursday night is money of you're on the right side.

    Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
     
  8. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Ya i kight jump on the next live bet jump... This defense did not show up like they did against romo
     
  9. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    I bet Houston fans miss Schaub, goodness..
     
  10. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    I jumped on Under 58.5 even harder. I'm all in, LOL.
     
  11. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    rofl, I'm going to wait after Houston scores...
     
  12. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    I jumped on under 60.5.... SIGH.. DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     
  13. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Now Under 61.5
     
  14. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    LOL. Run! Run! Run!

    I think Pep Hamilton doesn't need much encouragement to run and shorten the game while protecting the lead to be honest.
     
  15. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    okay that's not the type of defense I wanted...
     
  16. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Welp.

    That's defense...don't know if it's helpful tho....
     
  17. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    (Pulls collar) yeesh...maybe shouldn't have...
     
  18. byroan

    byroan Giggity Staff Member Administrator Luxury Box

    28,945
    49,388
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    NC
    Should've grabbed Texans + whatever at 24-0. Think it was 21.5.

    Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
     
  19. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Under is 68.5 now, lol.
     
  20. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Not very smart by Luck or the offensive coordinator. I think they were looking at the record book instead of the game. Now it's a two possession game and +2 Houston is alive.
     
  21. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    STOP THROWING :| run the ball and stay in bounds
     
    ckparrothead likes this.
  22. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Thanks a lot stone hands Fleener!!!

    Lol. More incompletes. Yuck.

    EDIT: Yay! Holding!
     
  23. byroan

    byroan Giggity Staff Member Administrator Luxury Box

    28,945
    49,388
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    NC
    Lol Richardson is so bad.

    Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
     
  24. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Well at least they are running a lot more. Bad news is they're in scoring position.

    EDIT: That's Pep Hamilton for ya. Shorten up the game, baby!
     
  25. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Swearinger is garbage...
     
  26. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Looks like the over under has sunk to 65.5
     
  27. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Don't be a dummy Phil, that would be intentional grounding and we don't need that! field goal position
     
  28. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Um, Gurley suspended, won't play against Missouri.. That's pretty big.

    e
     
  29. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Suspended indefinitely. Sounds like a pretty big deal, found out he sold 80 autographs for like $400.
     
  30. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    And just like that, betonline reacts and removes the line for Georgia vs Missouri lol
     
  31. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    The news has been out for hours. I think I found out around 5pm EST.
     
  32. byroan

    byroan Giggity Staff Member Administrator Luxury Box

    28,945
    49,388
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    NC
    Yeah, they pulled it earlier.

    Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
     
  33. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    That was a big no-score drive, pinned the Texans down at the 5 yard line too which puts the odds against them. Crossing fingers. Pep Hamilton still shortening up the game for me. Need Bill O'Brien to figure out that he's within reach and doesn't need to drop Fitzpatrick back to pass every single down.
     
  34. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Well looks like the colts defense has mailed it in
     
  35. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,395
    5,356
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Definitely staying away from tnf... Theyre too wild
     
    ckparrothead likes this.
  36. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    I'm sweating bullets over here.
     
  37. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    I lost the Under 51.5, lost the Under 58.5, won the Under 61.5, won the Under 68.5 and of course won the Indy -3.5.

    That was a lot of stress tonight for a low payout. Thursday night man, LOL.

    Luckily I also won the UCF Moneyline at -170 so I'm feeling OK.
     
  38. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    I still think TNF is essentially a good bet to make.

    Basically you just pick the straight up winner then bet that team to cover. Picking SU carries with it 70+ percent odds. Picking ATS usually only gets you around 53-54 percent over the long run. So if you get to make an ATS pick and have it come out right 70+ percent like a SU pick, that's a good deal.

    Some folks wouldn't have picked the Giants to win SU over the Redskins, but in hindsight as we've seen the two teams play, that was the right call. It wasn't a fluky outcome. So if you see a TNF matchup where you really think one team wins the game but you just don't know how much, it's a pretty safe bet that it's gonna be more than the spread.

    Where I'll think twice before getting into again is trying to peg the point totals on TNF. I came out ahead because I went heavier on the Under 61.5 and Under 68.5 than I did the Under 51.5 and Under 58.5, but even so that was nerve racking. The point total thing seems a bit more whacky.

    But in the end the Colts covered pretty comfortably, and it would've been even a greater victory if not for that botched snap Watt returned for a score. It's not like Watt beat a guy around the edge, stripped the football and ran it back for a score. That was a blown snap that he just picked up and scored.
     
  39. Tone_E

    Tone_E Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    13,965
    7,964
    113
    Dec 8, 2007
    After the 24 point lead it was looking like another rocking chair bet for me. Then it got close. A little too close for comfort. In the end IND covered with a defense tightened up at the right time.

    Was worried the AJ fumble would be overturned. Sure looked like it in slow motion but I think the refs made the right call, even though I was surprised they did.

    I'm doing pretty well on TNF (3-1) and may have to start betting 1.5 or 2 units on the games. :)
     
  40. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Yeah but even if the AJ fumble had been overturned it would have been 3rd & 20. Not exactly a favorable circumstance for the Texans. AJ really screwed them with that offensive pass interference. But it's hard to criticize because he was so good in the game otherwise.
     

Share This Page