Amazing Spider-Man II gets it right....well....sort of.

I get that and all and respect that view point but I'd rather have a good actor for the part even if he doesn't exactly look the part therefore having a better chance at a better movie/performance.

 

No, no, no Chuckles. You think the director's opinion for casting Giamatti and Foxx is ridiculous. I think your opinion for that is ridiculous. Whatever you're saying I am, you're doing the same.

 

No its the time honored way of calling you a hypocrite, because you are. You ***** about the directors opinion and blast me for *****ing about yours. That makes you a hypocrite...at least admit it.

 

Huh? I went back and saw the post you're referring to, but I missed it and its not what I'm talking about. its this:

You've said this before numerous times. That's what I'm talking about.

Now, we can get into how come you thought i was talking a post I didn't quote and not about the post I did quote, if you want, but that's just gonna end with you looking...I won't say ******ed because that implies you've been tarded twice, so we'll just go with tarded.

 

Ok in that example where the character doesn't have a lot of dialogue or really has to act, then 100% yes I agree with you. Get someone that looks the part. So for Sabretooth in the original X-Men, completely agree. Or for the "Bane" character in Batman & Robin. But I wouldn't want Triple H, for example, playing Thor or The Ultimate Warrior playing He-Man.

 

We are really close to a break through here, I just need you to go back and see i didn't quote or even see the post you're talking about. I didn't respond to it or quote it.

And while you're back there and looking that up, you'll see I wasn't that serious either, you just kept being you, then completely misunderstood the whole thing and doubled down on you being you.

So again to be clear, I never saw or responded to this post:

I was only giving you **** about this statement:

You can verify that by seeing I quoted it and responded to it.

Everything else can be chalked up to, "Pagan gonna Pagan."

 

It's been confirmed that Rhino will be CGI.

http://www.superherohype.com/news/a...pider-man-2-set-photos-featuring-pre-cg-rhino

 

Check out the potbelly on Paul Giammati. Christ, at least try to workout.

 

Interesting piece of news below the spidey pics. Joss Whedon talking about Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch in next Avengers

wonder if they will mention any kind of tie-in with Magneto as the father.

http://m.superherohype.com/news/articles/177121-joss-whedon-talks-scarlet-witch-and-quicksilver-in-the-avengers-2

 

I don't think there will be any mention of Magento, because his movie rights are owned by a different company. Same with Spiderman. Hopefully, someday, they'll all be back under Marvel they way they should be.

In fact in the next X-men movie there'll be a different version of Quicksilver than the one in Avengers.

 

They cannot mention mutants or Magneto. Unless they make some back end deal.

 

Oh I hope Marvel can one day get Spiderman and X-Men back. Imagine all the ties in they can and would do if they had their full Marvel Universe.

Hopefully now that Marvel is backed by Disney, Mickey Mouse will open up his wallet and dish out the cash to buy them back.

 

Yeah they tried to do a tie in with The Avengers and The Amazing Spiderman in 2012. They would have shown the Stark Tower in TASM and in turn make a brief mention of Spiderman in The Avengers but the two studios could come to an agreement.

 

maybe Whedon will devise a clever way to reference their Dad without saying his name. To me, half the interest of the Witch and Quicksilver was their origins.

On another note, seems silly that Marvel will introduce Quicksilver before DC introduces the Flash.

 

So much for that idea.

Also Quicksilver will also be in Days of Future Past. He will be played by Evan Peters.

You may know him from such tv shows as American Horror Story.

The whole situation is kind of funny.
You cant call a mutant character a Mutant in one film, and you cant mention his ties to the Avengers in the other.

 

Sony must be pretty confident TAS2 is going to be a hit. They have scheduled release dates for #3 and #4 for 2016 and 2018 already. Doesn't look like the Spiderman franchise is going to end up with Marvel anytime soon.

 

Mary Jane Watson has officially be cut from the 2nd movie and instead will appear in and 3rd and 4th movie even though she already filmed scenes for #2.

 

Yeah... so about Paul Giamatti....



"You know what this movie needs?"

"What?"

"CGI Robots"

"Thats brilliant!" "Pass the cocaine!"

 

Ugh

 

Wait what the hell is that? It looks like one of the Power Ranger's vehicles from the early 90s.

 

It appears to be Voltron's **** by the looks of it.

 

First trailer for TAS2 is out now, sorry no link. It looks ok. Nothing we haven't seen before. I do worry that it's casting overload especially with 3 or 4 bad guys in it.

 

Sounds familiar (spidey 3)

And seriously that robot is ridiculous. First thing I thought of was power rangers as well......sigh

 

Yeah the trailer doesn't make it look better either. And I completely forgot that Jaime Foxx was in the movie too until the mid point of the trailer. Just seems like a lot of stuff is going on in the film like Spiderman 3. I had high hopes for this film, as I thought the 1st movie was pretty good but I don't really know what to expect from it now.

Still really wish that Marvel Studios would get back the Spiderman, X-Men and Fantastic 4 properties from the other movie studios.

 

God who doesnt?!

Imagine Spidey saving the day when the avengers are failing or something?! Or a Xmen/Avengers mix up. Or Spidey and Xmen! Wolverine Vs Hulk! Jesus I dream it!

I hope they build this movie good into the sinister six we're expected. Doc Ocs arms and Vultures wings are seen in oscorp during the trailer too.

 

[video=youtube_share;MpF5M-xkI4w]http://youtu.be/MpF5M-xkI4w[/video]

 

I still cant get over Paul Giamani in that ridiculous run dmc track suit with a barbwire tattoo on his forehead. Hope they prove me wrong but he looks RIDICULOUS......

 

I finally got around to watching the first one from this series, and I liked it.

Yes it changed a lot of things, but it got the spirit of the comics waaaaaaaaaay better then Raimi's trilogy. This trailer seems the same, lots of changes, but it still feels like the comics to me.

 

I'm assuming we will ultimately see Doc Ock and Vulture since they plan to make 2 more Spiderman movies after this and continue with the same series. The one thing I really hope is we don't get another bad guy where they try to make the viewer feel bad for him. Every villain in the Remy series was treated like "a bad guy with a heart of gold deep down inside". I just want a villain who is bad just for the sake of being bad. What's wrong with that?

 

[video=youtube;l2KSPiTOMR8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2KSPiTOMR8[/video]

 

Bryan Singer tweeted that X-Men:Age of Apocalypse will come out May 2016. Looks like Fox is very happy with Days of Future Past.

 

So who plays Apocalypse?

 

Rhino looks ridiculous. Harry seems creepy(in a bad way). Questionable choice having him be goblin first. I have a feeling Electro will get the Sandman treatment alla Spider-Man 3.