Half of the UDFAs I know next to nothing about, other than reading some reports. It's highly possible there may yet be a trade for a veteran OT. No one knows anything, so what better time than to boldly declare who will make the 53 man roster, than now, when we know nothing. I have peered into the palantir and seen the future. Here it is... 25 Offense QB Ryan Tannehill Matt Moore RB Lamar Miller Mike Gillislee Marcus Thigpen FB/H-Back Charles Clay Jorvorskie Lane TE Dustin Keller Dion Sims Michael Egnew WR Mike Wallace Rishard Matthews Armon Binns Chad Bumphis Brandon Gibson Brian Hartline OL Mike Pouncey Nate Garner Richie Incognito John Jerry Lance Louis Jonathan Martin Dallas Thomas Will Yeatman Tyson Clabo 25 Defense DT Vaughan Martin Kheeston Randall Paul Soliai Randy Starks DE Cam Wake Dion Jordan Jared Odrick Derrick Shelby Olivier Vernon LB Dannell Ellerbe Jelani Jenkins Josh Kaddu Koa Misi Jason Trusnik Austin Spitler Phillip Wheeler CB Brent Grimes Jamar Taylor Nolan Carroll Will Davis Jimmy Wilson Richard Marshall S Chris Clemons Reshad Jones Jordan Kovacs (aka Rudy) 3 STs K Caleb Sturgis P Brandon Fields LS John Denney ----------------------- TOTAL = 53 [Edited: Add Tyson Clabo - Subtract Jonas Gray] LADIES AND GENTLEMEN...... YOUR 2013 MIAMI DOLPHINS!!!!!
i dont think Lane will make the team this year and jesus we still could not find a way to replace trusnik and spitler, i also hope we keep Patterson around
I hate to go all nerd on you, but i have to say the palantir is used for communicating, not foreseeing the future.
I weighed that one. They may carry Devlin, but I think they need the roster spot too much for other positions that require depth and *will* see the field. Though with our OT's Devlin may actually be a smart person to keep on the 53.
Lol. I thought about that as I typed it, and was relying on the fact that someone would notice and make this clear. It appears you are the One. May the force be with you.
I don't entirely disagree, but the guys we cut can be called upon if we feel its necessary. I doubt our CB castoffs a make other teams. Also, I couldn't cut a Charles Clay in favor of an RJ Stanford.
If I had to make a 53 man depth chart right now, it'd go something like this: QB - Tannehill, Moore, Devlin RB - Miller, Gillislee, Thomas FB - Lane WR - Wallace, Hartline, Gibson, Matthews, Tyms TE - Keller, Sims, Clay, Egnew T - Martin, Thomas, Garner, Yeatman G - Incognito, Louis C - Pouncey, Samuda DE - Wake, Odrick, Vernon, Shelby DT - Soliai, Starks, Randall, Martin OLB - Misi, Wheeler, Jordan, Kaddu, Trusnik ILB - Ellerbe, Jenkins CB - Grimes, Taylor, Marshall, Davis, Stanford, Presley S - Jones, Clemons, McCray, Wilson K - Sturgis P - Fields LS - Scales RS - Thigpen Notes - Official site lists Thigpen as a RB. I put him as a "return specialist" for now. - I think Daniel Thomas could be replaced by Jonas Gray, Cameron Marshall, or some other free agent cut later in camp. - I think the 5th receiver will be a direct replacement for Marlon Moore's play on special teams. For now I left Tyms there as he was activated in week 17 last year. - I'm unsure what they'll do with Charles Clay and Michael Egnew, but I've got them both on the roster as of now. - I listed Dallas Thomas as T, until they presumably sign a free agent. I'd slot him at G after that. Miami mostly kept 8 OL last year, so I think there's going to be a surprise cut somewhere in there (Incognito?). - Miami has a lot of movable parts in their front 7, so I don't think they'll keep a ton of guys. - I stuck Jelani Jenkins as Ellerbe's backup at MIKE, mostly because I think he'll lop Austin Spitler off the roster due to special teams play. - I kept 10 DBs. Miami did that most weeks last year, and it's something the Bengals almost always did when Coyle was there. I have Dimitri Patterson as a cap casualty. Guys I'd suspect might not be around come week 1 that ARE on my depth chart right now: Daniel Thomas David Tyms Michael Egnew Will Yeatman Richie Incognito Josh Kaddu R.J. Stanford De'Andre Presley Jimmy Wilson Patrick Scales
Bold move leaving Dmitri Patterson off the CB list. Daniel Thomas is off the RBs, which is suprising but entirely possible
I can't see 6 WR's on the roster. And there will most likely be 3 QB's. I also think Daniel Thomas will make the team.
I hope Will Yeatman can show us something this year. A lot of people ripped Egnew (as a rookie) because he couldn't get on the field. How long is this Yeatman experiment going to continue?
I can see Gillislee taking a lot of touches from Thomas if he (Thomas) even makes the team. Cuncushin-Fumbelitis is a sickness and should not be tolerated on this team.
In fact, don't be too surprised if by the start of the season, Gillislee is the starter over Miller. I'm not guaranteeing it, I'm just saying to be surprised if it happens.
If Lamar Miller doesn't improve his pass blocking and Gillislee's pass blocking skills translate from college to the pros, there is a decent chance of that happening.
At this point, Miller is the certainly more explosive home run threat, but Gilly seems to be a more complete back. It just wouldn't shock me, if they let Miller occupy the same role many of us wanted Tavon to be, and let Gilly be the traditional RB.
Double whoa!! On the whole miller To receiver notion..Miller does catch the ball very well so hopefully we can line him up across the line when we go 4 or 5 wide.
Kind of what I call an XR. More like Austin was used in college, RB, screen receiver, end around runner, etc.
like your selection with very few changes: yeats will be replaced by a veteran OT & jeff fuller will make the WR list
I could see Collins or Bumphis in that role. However, I remind myself as I look at the Packer roster, that all the receivers can run the full route tree and are a little bigger than the traditional slot receiver.
I think we naturally root for the underdog, but I believe Patterson is a favorite over a guy like Nolan Carroll or even Will Davis, and Thomas is a favorite over Gray.
IMO, the only reason Patterson wouldn't make the roster, won't be talent, it will be Ireland trying to save money with someone cheaper like Carroll or Stanford. If we keep the best 5 corners regardless of price, both Marshall and Patterson will make it, along with Taylor and Davis.
After looking at the offensive roster you posted as your picks at this time, I realize that besides possibly Wallace at WR, this offense really isn't that impressive looking. The offensive line remains a huge question mark. It could actually be worse than last year if the players you have listed end up being the players they keep. Tannehill needs to develop, but at this time he remains a question mark. None of the RB's on the roster have ever been a starter in the NFL. Personally I would have preferred the Dolphins kept Bush, but we can only hope Miller is the back many people on here think he will be. I wasn't a big fan of Fasano, but I don't think Keller is a big upgrade at the TE position. He might be a better receiver, but his blocking leaves a lot to be desired. Hopefully Sims will be able to come in and provide more to the TE position than Egnew did last year. As far as Egnew is concerned , I have no idea if he will ever be a productive player in the NFL. Time will tell At the WR position, I don't see Gibson as an upgrade to Bess. I would rather have seen the Dolphins keep Bess and sign him to a new contract. Hopefully Wallace will be the impact WR the Dolphins signed him to be and Hartline continues to have a few decent games during the upcoming season. As far as the rest of the WR's on your list goes, they are all huge questions marks right now. I think the defense will continue to be the dominant unit on this roster and the offense will probably continue to struggle scoring points in 2013. It is just too bad the Dolphins weren't able to upgrade the LT and RG positions in the draft or in free agency, according to your present 53 man list. I also have concerns about the RT position with this list of players. Hopefully the Dolphins will sign one of the veteran RT's they have talked to in the last week. Martin protecting the blindside for Tannehill is a really scary thought, as far as I am concerned. This roster might be good enough to win 8 or possibly 9 games, but I don't see this as a playoff roster. I think it will be at least one more year and further upgrades on the offense, before this team is a legitimate playoff contender.
If it wasn't for going up to get DJ, I would of went ballistic if we passed on Eifert at 12...basically I agree with you to some degree, the offense is not complete unless Egnew, Miller and Gibson tear it up, so those evaluations under his clock better be good,
Wasn't there just a snippet out this week that Miami has Marcus Thigpen pegged for that role? I like Gillislee, but I can't see him starting over Miller. Miller's got better vision and is more explosive. He also wasn't as bad at pass-pro, IMO, as many on here would lead you to believe.
I'm just saying it wouldn't shock is all. Like has been mentioned if gilly is a better blocker.....then who knows.
Since he's been a tackle for just 1 season I'd give another year learning the position. Now that we have Clabo, he can sit another year and maybe fill in for Clabo for a few series. They'll probably do the same thing with Thomas and Incognito.
Eifert was the player I wanted them to take at 12. I certainly won't argue with moving up to take Jordan, but I just wish we had more play makers on offense. Wallace can certainly take it to the endzone on any given play. Miller has the speed to break long runs, but until he shows he can do it as a starting RB in the NFL, there remain questions about how effective he will be in the NFL as the primary RB on the team. The rest of the skill players on the offense are rather mediocre at this time. Hopefully some of these players will take a giant step up and become impact players at their positions, especially Tannehill.
If the roster looks set, shift money forward from some of your major players. Cameron Wake, Mike Wallace, and Reshad Jones should get large amounts of future cash thrown towards them immediately to fill up the cap after June 1st. Move dollars forward to open up the situation in one year. If you've got the 53 more or less set (more so than in other years) I think that's definitely appropriate.