The Subtle Redefinition of the Miami Dolphins Player

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by shouright, Sep 5, 2012.

  1. FinNasty

    FinNasty Alabama don’t want this... Staff Member Club Member

    24,662
    37,847
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    It is dumb IMO to have strict guidelines that auto-eliminate players from consideration, yes... but talent wins out over character more often than not. Choosing character over talent repeatedly will get you a bunch of boyscouts that suck at football.
     
  2. shouright

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    I think what's best is to have a list of characteristics that are essential, and another list that are preferable.

    You can get by with the guys who don't have the preferable ones, and you can exhibit flexibility with regard to those, depending on other factors (such as speed, for example), but you should have a strict philosophy IMO on the essential ones.

    For example, if the cornerstone of Philbin's philosophy with regard to player personnel is professionalism, and he's prone to downright cut guys who don't have that, then he should make damn sure the guys he acquires have emotional maturity. If you're emotionally immature, i.e., Vontae Davis, there's a good chance your professionalism is going to suffer.

    So that would be an example of a "strict" blueprint or prototype. In other areas they can be more flexible.
     
  3. FinNasty

    FinNasty Alabama don’t want this... Staff Member Club Member

    24,662
    37,847
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    I'm sorry shou... we are on absolute opposite sides of the planet on this issue.

    The thought that "professionalism" should be a "strict" rule in choosing which players to acquire... while physical ability and/or talent should be seen as "flexible" is absolutely ludicrous to me.
     
  4. shouright

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    I think the belief is that to the extent a guy is professional, he's going to maximize his physical talent.

    These are not either-or characteristics. You can have both.
     
    Bpk likes this.
  5. FinNasty

    FinNasty Alabama don’t want this... Staff Member Club Member

    24,662
    37,847
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Right, but it's how you prioritize those characteristics. Even if a guy isn't maximizing his physical talents, but yet is still better than the professional player who is maximizing his, why would I want the lesser player b/c he shows up to meetings on time and has his shoes tied in walk thrus?
     
  6. HardKoreXXX

    HardKoreXXX Insensitive to the Touch

    20,459
    14,210
    113
    Apr 2, 2008
    Coral Springs, FL
    I agree with most of this. Yes, going character over talent will get you mediocre talent at best. But at the same time you can't go completely the other way either, then you're the Bengals of a few years ago.
     
  7. shouright

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    Because of synergism -- when the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

    You could have 53 guys who are all very physically talented and very unprofessional, and adding up their physical talent is going to give you a less effective team overall than 53 guys who are less talented but professional.

    In other words, there's a team-wide effect (i.e., a culture) that comes from having like-minded players who behave similarly along a dimension that contributes strongly to physical play.

    That culture, when you spread it across 53 guys, is worth more than raising the level of the team's overall physical talent without such a culture IMO.
     
    Bpk likes this.
  8. FinNasty

    FinNasty Alabama don’t want this... Staff Member Club Member

    24,662
    37,847
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Ya see... I don't buy into that stuff. At minimum, I think that it weighs far less than how you weigh it.
     
    shouright likes this.
  9. shouright

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    And now we've arrived at the kind of philosophical difference that underlies just about every big disagreement on this board. ;)

    Nothing wrong with that. We'll never know who's right and who's wrong.
     
  10. Dol-Fan Dupree

    Dol-Fan Dupree Tank? Who is Tank? I am Guy Incognito.

    40,544
    33,044
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    I disagree. I think one can easily find two plays from Ginn that were actually successful that showed more than Gates. Including his beautiful touchdown catch, his return for a touchdown where he juked two guys and the few plays where he completely beat his guy, the ball was under thrown, then he jumped up and caught the ball.

    In their first two years Ginn looks to be a much better football player than Gates.
     
  11. FinNasty

    FinNasty Alabama don’t want this... Staff Member Club Member

    24,662
    37,847
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Like I said... opposite sides of the planet. ;)
     
  12. Stringer Bell

    Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    The world is littered with guys that are talented enough to play in the NFL. There is a reason why not every NFL player runs a 4.5 and has a 40" vertical.
     
    Phin likes this.
  13. djphinfan

    djphinfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    117,249
    74,923
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Let's take a look at five payers that were on our team..

    Marshall, Johnson, Davis, Jerry, Carey..all very talented football players, all pretty unprofessional..what does that get us Nasty?

    Maybe we should rethink the philosophy a bit..because it seems as though the acquisitions have been favoring the strategy you are refferring to, in some cases pretty obvious.

    I know if I was a Gm, it would give some precedence in the evaluation as it pertains to the players intelligence on work ethic and self awareness...especially players that are hi round picks, if they don't get it by the senior year, or the year they decide to come out( Landry jones, Ryan mallet) then it should be justifiably so, a serious red flag on where their at mentally.
     
  14. Phin

    Phin New Member

    86
    28
    0
    Aug 27, 2012

    The Patriots are consistantly good to great because they have high character guys. Look at their Super Bowl winning years. Other than Brady, who had HoF talent on those teams? What players left the Patriots and did as well as they did there? Why do you think the Patriots can keep winning even though they miss on a GREAT deal of draft picks and flip over their roster almost every season? Good coaching and high character players. Even when they take a chance on an iffy player they will cut that player fast if they fall out of line.
     
    Bpk and shouright like this.
  15. HardKoreXXX

    HardKoreXXX Insensitive to the Touch

    20,459
    14,210
    113
    Apr 2, 2008
    Coral Springs, FL
    We lost a ton of production and our best offensive player in Marshall and arguably our best defensive playmaker in Vontae and John Jerry is...John Jerry.

    I think you can attribute the lack of success of this team to several key factors, but I think the lack of professionalism of those guys was probably pretty low on the list.

    If we had 2 other WR's like Brandon Marshall and an entire secondary of Vontae's I think we'd have been ok. Vontae wasn't a bad guy by any means and I think his character issues were really overblown, mostly by people who wanted to spin that into some sort of good trade. It wasn't.
     
    FinNasty likes this.
  16. Stringer Bell

    Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    I think its pretty fair to say that the WR that berates the QB and forces coaches to quit is having a negative impact on the team.

    His character issues were overblown. Which is why him being the 3rd CB is an indication that he just wasn't as good as people want to believe.
     
    Larryfinfan likes this.
  17. djphinfan

    djphinfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    117,249
    74,923
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Ginn was farther ahead, ginn could run routes, catch passes in different parts of the field.

    His lack if reps, just visual production, in preseason and regular season games was just bad.
     
  18. Phin

    Phin New Member

    86
    28
    0
    Aug 27, 2012
    The thing with Marshall is that he's a ticking time bomb. Philbin wasn't comfortable with that so he's gone.

    Vontae had/has all the skill in the world, but it's evident that he's about as smart as this chocolate covered almond I'm about to eat. It's obvious that Philbin and Coyle (possibly Ireland) did not think he'd get much better in their system...so they traded him while he still had value.

    Again, I ask what players (besides Brady) play for the Patriots have all world skills? Not many. However, the thing that the majority of them do have is character. Hell, even Brady isn't all that spectacular as far as skill level. He's just such a smart, high character guy that he shines.
     
    shouright likes this.
  19. djphinfan

    djphinfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    117,249
    74,923
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    I edited my post X..I had five players..Marshall..Carey..Davis..Jerry..Johnson.

    You don't see a trend?
     
  20. rafael

    rafael Well-Known Member

    27,364
    31,261
    113
    Apr 6, 2008
    Ginn always struggled with contact and could never figure out hand placement. I was a big Ginn supporter but he was the opposite of a football player. He was fast and he worked hard but he lacked Gates instincts.
     
    CWBIII likes this.
  21. HardKoreXXX

    HardKoreXXX Insensitive to the Touch

    20,459
    14,210
    113
    Apr 2, 2008
    Coral Springs, FL
    Until you can prove that those guys would've been detrimental to the teams performance, no. Replace Marshall and Vontae with the greatest character guys in the league, if they can't duplicate their production then it doesn't matter how professional they are.
     
  22. Da 'Fins

    Da 'Fins Season Ticket Holder Staff Member Club Member

    38,168
    56,635
    113
    Dec 19, 2007
    Birmingham, AL
    They key was that Gates has been in two camps and in the league for over a year and still doesn't know how to run a route. Maybe it was bad coaching. But, he didn't catch on.

    It's also the case that Philbin said at one point, "any of the 11 could be cut; or kept" (Paraphrase).

    I think it's clear that Philbin won out in this case, convincing Ireland of what the deal was with Gates. I think Philbin has some good points on this; but I also don't know that it's a good thing. Philbin can't scout players. He can mainly offer input on what he sees on the field under his coaching tutelage. He doesn't have time to scout all these guys. Coaches these days are generally poor personnel decision-makers. It's a very difficult job. It will be interesting to see if Ireland can adjust and bring in players that will be real players.

    Maybe this will be a wake-up for Gates to learn to run routes. Who knows.
     
    Bpk likes this.
  23. HardKoreXXX

    HardKoreXXX Insensitive to the Touch

    20,459
    14,210
    113
    Apr 2, 2008
    Coral Springs, FL
    Those teams were talented. Lets not act like they weren't. Also, Corey Dillon wasn't the most professional RB in league history.
     
  24. Stringer Bell

    Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    Sure it does, if they are detracting from the production of others.

    In regards to proof of Marshall's detriment, look no further than Karl Dorrell moving from WR coach to QB coach because he no longer wanted to work with Marshall.
     
  25. djphinfan

    djphinfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    117,249
    74,923
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    A lot of that is true, but we're only talking about the comparison, thus far its hard to compare such bad data...I do think Ginn played much better than gates in their rookie year, even though Ginn was 4 years younger..
     
    Bpk likes this.
  26. Phin

    Phin New Member

    86
    28
    0
    Aug 27, 2012
    Every starting player and every back-up player on every team in the NFL is talented. Dillon straightened up once he became a Patriot. Randy Moss did too..until he reverted and was cut.

    Again, what Patriot players went to other teams and had the same success they had in New England? I can't think of one.
     
    Fin D likes this.
  27. HardKoreXXX

    HardKoreXXX Insensitive to the Touch

    20,459
    14,210
    113
    Apr 2, 2008
    Coral Springs, FL
    What others on this team did he detract production from? Bess? Hartline?

    I don't see what Dorrell has to do with anything.
     
  28. HardKoreXXX

    HardKoreXXX Insensitive to the Touch

    20,459
    14,210
    113
    Apr 2, 2008
    Coral Springs, FL
    Of course, talent is a relative term. Some teams are more talented than others. Some teams have first ballot HOF QB's, like New England, and some don't.
     
  29. Phin

    Phin New Member

    86
    28
    0
    Aug 27, 2012
    What if Dorrell worked well with Bess and Hartline? What if their production was effected by having to change coaches?

    Marshall is a cancer. Yes, he's talented, can't catch worth a ****, but he could let the ball bounce off of his hands a lot. I guess that means he got open?
     
  30. djphinfan

    djphinfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    117,249
    74,923
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    the trend I see is highly talented players with issues, subsequently 4 Have been dismissed in their primes, and one is hanging on the edge of glory..

    I won't bore you and get into detail of performance related things but I'm referring to the evaluation process from the get, what standards are in place from the get, should there be adjustments made to those standards and the if we can quantify which players collectively, can win more games.
     
  31. Phin

    Phin New Member

    86
    28
    0
    Aug 27, 2012
    One player. So?

    The worst running back in the league isn't that far away, in regards to skill level, from the best running back in the league. The same goes with every other position. The BIGGEST factor between HOF level and good level is character.
     
  32. HardKoreXXX

    HardKoreXXX Insensitive to the Touch

    20,459
    14,210
    113
    Apr 2, 2008
    Coral Springs, FL
    I couldn't disagree more. I would once again point out guys like Irvin, Deion and others who were HOF players and low-character people.

    Having better character doesn't make you a better player. You're talking about an intangible.
     
  33. shouright

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    Also -- and this refers to what I was talking about above -- they have a team culture that allows them to take on guys with less character and straighten them out. Randy Moss and Chad Johnson are great examples.

    That culture is comprised of a longstanding critical mass of players -- leaders -- who hold their teammates accountable to it.

    It's not so much that they get rid of guys quickly when they fall out of line, but that their team culture is so strong that the guys never do fall out of line!

    Now here we have a situation where the team culture isn't yet developed, so we have to "pull weeds" and get rid of low-character guys in order to establish the "lawn."

    In New England the lawn is so well-established that it crowds the weeds out.
     
    Phin likes this.
  34. Phin

    Phin New Member

    86
    28
    0
    Aug 27, 2012
    I guess I should have been more clear. Team character. Deion and Irvin were players with good football character. Hell, even then those two didn't really have any problems in or out of football while they played. It was when they retired that they got in trouble.
     
  35. Stringer Bell

    Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    I think Irvin and Deion inspired their teammates and coaches, not berated them.
     
    Phin likes this.
  36. Stringer Bell

    Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    You don't see how Brandon Marshall causing Dorrell to move is a negative? What type of environment do you think would cause a WR coach to move to QB coach because of one player?
     
    Bpk and Phin like this.
  37. HardKoreXXX

    HardKoreXXX Insensitive to the Touch

    20,459
    14,210
    113
    Apr 2, 2008
    Coral Springs, FL
    As I said last week, I'd encourage you to read Pearlman's book about the Cowboys. Here's an excerpt:


    Bottom line, the Cowboys were so good it didn't matter. Hence Talent >>>>>>>> Character.
     
  38. shouright

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    Well Irvin did have the one incident that got him suspended while he was still playing, but overall I think he was one of the greatest player leaders of all time.
     
    Bpk likes this.
  39. rafael

    rafael Well-Known Member

    27,364
    31,261
    113
    Apr 6, 2008
    My training is as a scout. I look for what will and won't be developed. What Ginn was lacking wasn't changing despite several years in the league. Gates only had one year in the NFL. The argument against Gates was that he wasn't working as hard as professional should, but he already should more instincts and body and hand control than Ginn ever did.
     
  40. HardKoreXXX

    HardKoreXXX Insensitive to the Touch

    20,459
    14,210
    113
    Apr 2, 2008
    Coral Springs, FL
    First off, is this a fact? Did Dorrell come out and say this? I ask because I honestly don't know.

    Secondly, I think environment is overrated. I think Brandon Marshall had great production here, and I'm not sure if his character level was that of Mother Theresa would the Dolphins record have been any different. Do you?
     

Share This Page