Re-Try: Ten Thoughts on First Half of Panthers Preseason Game

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by ckparrothead, Aug 21, 2011.

  1. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    NOTE: This thread is a re-try. Let's make this a FOOTBALL discussion, an on topic discussion that follows the TOS here at ThePhins, the spirit with which this place was originally created by Muck, Celtkin, etc. Leave your ad hominem attacks and attacks on peoples' character out of this thread, and others please leave out discussions of any perception you might have about the state of affairs on this board. I would like this to remain about the FOOTBALL issues that I've raised in the following write-up.

    Ten Thoughts on First Half of Panthers Preseason Game

    1. Reggie Bush. He was very impressive. This is not my favorite player in the world, I've made that clear. But in many ways he was far better a player than I expected him to be, and in other ways he was exactly the player I expected him to be. He has worked very hard and is physically bigger and stronger than he was in New Orleans. On one play he actually dragged DT Sione Fua for about 4 or 5 yards carried on his back. The Panthers did not respect Reggie at all in the beginning of the game, and as a result he was open for some big plays. What's even more incredible is the number of plays he could have made in the passing game if Henne decided to use him even more. As for his running, he showed decent vision, and definitely more post-contact ability than I've seen him have in his entire career. But, he still dances. He left yards on the field because of that hesitation and tendency to dance. I looked at every play, the ones that came back or were wiped by penalty, etc. He had that 28 yard gain called back by the block in the back from Marshall. The problem with that play? He danced enough on it to give Jason Taylor a run for his money on Dancing With the Stars. Decisive action would have earned him those 28 yards without Marshall feeling a need to block someone in the back. As things stand Marshall blocked a guy in the back and that was indeed the only reason Bush was able to gain those 28 yards. But tendency to dance aside, it'll be interesting to see if he can stay healthy because he flashed last night in every phase. At one point he even completely upended a Defensive End in single blocking.

    2. Carolina. Let's face it, they really played like a poor football team, and that has to temper our excitement over this game. There was a goal line play where Bush slammed right into the back of his blockers with no real vision, and was allowed to play bumper cars and stab around until he finally found a couple of yards, because Sherrod Martin had terrible containment on the play. Their linebackers and defensive lineman continually lost back side containment on run plays. They never brought out anything even remotely interesting in a passing situation, except I believe one time and on that play they got what they sought...a pressure on Henne and field goal instead of continuing on the long drive. By the time Miami got that second touchdown, the Panthers had taken their starters off the field and moved to their 2nd string, and there were huge gaps in the defense after that. Miami definitely threw more at Carolina from a game planning standpoint than Carolina threw at us. Don't argue, Sparano said before the game that they were going to game plan this one.

    3. Defensive Play Calling. As I said, Miami threw a lot more things at Carolina than Carolina threw at us. This was especially true on defense, where Miami broke out multiple exotic blitz packages on third down. They had safety blitzes, they had overload blitzes, they had guys like Starks and Wake line their hands up in the dirt then drop back into coverage, zero cover looks, disguised looks. They did a lot against the rookie QB and most of it worked as intended. There's a reason they shut the Panthers down with 0 points by halftime.

    4. Pass Rush. There was something disturbing about the pass rush to me. It had to be manufactured. The only one that was getting pass rush organically was Cameron Wake. Koa Misi couldn't get in there. Jason Taylor wasn't even close. They used Kendall Langford on pass rush packages, with not great results. I like Jared Odrick but even he wasn't getting much going that way. That was really not encouraging. Their answer to the question of "what if they focus a lot on Wake" turns out to be Jason Taylor and a lot more blitzing. I don't like the Jason Taylor part of that answer, and I think the blitzing aspect of it comes with drawbacks.

    5. Kevin Burnett & Karlos Dansby. They were fine like wine in this game. Dansby was all over it, especially early. Crowder wasn't lying when he said after the Falcons showing that he expects Karlos to tighten it up and get everyone right. Burnett is a damn good coverage guy, he ends up with a lot of responsibility. In zone, the depth of his drops and the natural feel for the lanes are about as good as you get. In man, you can trust him a lot more than you can trust other guys. Miami has two excellent cover guys at linebacker and that should help them be able to blitz more unpredictably because they both can handle being the cover guy on any given play. Can they stop the run consistently though? We'll see. I have my doubts.

    6. Chad Henne. I thought he did OK. He was pretty good. To me, he was mediocre until that last drive of the half, when he hit Fasano as he scrambled out of the pocket, and then he scrambled for 17 yards to get near the end zone. Those were plays that REAL quarterbacks make, and he made them. Before that, he'd have a good read and a good play here, but then he'd have a play where he left a lot on the board. The deep accuracy still needs work. And by that I mean, isn't likely to ever come. As you watch him you start to appreciate the reasons behind the plays he doesn't make. In the case of the bad deep passes, a lot of it is his vision on the field. He just can't lock onto guys quickly. If he waits until he sees it, this leads to stare downs, which present their own problems, or losses of timing, which are problematic. If he doesn't wait until he sees it, then this leads to poor decision making (oh sh-t there was a DB there??), or bad accuracy. The first deep ball to Hartline he executes play-action and there was no hesitation, it was great timing. Good shoulder aiming, good touch, he just led Hartline too much. Why? Bob Griese pointed it out, it was because of the good timing. He didn't SEE Hartline and so he's just taking a stab in the dark with the accuracy. Another deep ball later, it's not play-action, but Gates gets a free release and is running through the secondary like a hot knife thru butter. Why is this ball off? Because Henne took the time (like he needed to) to stare down the safety and freeze him, before he clicked over to Gates and release it with good timing. That unfortunately means he probably didn't SEE Clyde Gates before he released that ball. Result? It's not easy to overthrow Clyde Gates when he has a free release, but he did. In only a half of football, Henne did still have that typical Chad brain fart, too. On one play he rushed it off to Reggie Bush, he threw the ball to him instead of passing it to him. On a 3rd & 19 for some reason he locked onto Fasano up the field for 16 yards between 3 defenders when he had Davone Bess to his left also finding a soft spot in the zone with only one defender near him and a valid chance to run with it after the catch for the improbable 1st down (thanks to Carolina's soft, unaggressive and vanilla defense). On a 3rd & 13 that preceded the turnover on downs, he took the cheap 9 yards to Bess underneath with again, a lot of guys around Davone in the zone and no shot at running after the catch. But there were holes in that zone, especially a corner route, but Henne just doesn't like those kinds of routes, likes the comebacks and the stationary targets. There was one play, I just don't even know WHAT he was thinking. There were options running open everywhere. He could have decisively thrown t4he Daniel Thomas wheel early in the play, or Clyde Gates crossing over the middle, or he could have waited and thrown the post to Anthony Fasano in the end zone. He just stared, like there wasn't a thought in his head, and then finally he clicked over and threw the wheel WAY TOO LATE. The corner was in short zone and should have picked that off and it might have been a pick-6. There were a lot of other plays where Henne's plan on the play was overly conservative, and as a result until that final TD against the backups, even though it was a good day offensively, they had drives end in a FG, a punt and a turnover on downs. If this is what Henne looks like on a GOOD day, then that still concerns me. But if we're just taking the day as it is, then this was not a bad day at all. Pretty average, decent performance.

    7. Brian Daboll. I really like his offense. Not unlike Dan Henning, he's got a lot of keenly designed plays drawn up and you see them executed and have a good appreciation for them, and then you see a play call here and there and you think what the hell was that? He had a few of those, no doubt. He definitely did game plan this game some. You could see that. He didn't keep it simple and vanilla. He spread the field out, he had some good route concepts going. It was promising. But it's still going to come down to execution and instincts, and this offense was NOT tested by the Panthers, trust me. They did not bring out anything even remotely exotic for most of the game.

    8. Rookie Report. Clyde Gates was OK, but just that. He's being asked to run routes from the perimeter and that's a hard thing to ask the guy. He's got to get off the jam and he has to read safety leverage instead of just corner leverage. They could make things easier on him by putting him in the slot, but they have too many other guys they want to use there. I don't like him on returns at all. I think Phil Livas is the man for that. Charles Clay showed some potential as a blocker in this game, I liked seeing that. Daniel Thomas...he's not ready. We'll see. But I've watched a lot of Stevan Ridley in New England, and thus far, Ridley has been the far superior player. He may actually be able to play this year. Thomas, I'm not sure. They're actually going to have to rely on Reggie Bush as that featured back IMO and even with him looking a lot better in a Miami uniform than I thought he would, that scares me. Among the things I didn't like in Thomas were his pad level which leads to him getting stoned and going down too easily, his fumbling problem showed up on the goal line and that absolutely should have been a fumble and turnover if Carolina didn't have a superfluous 12th man on the field. Daniel seemed good for the cutback, and then you realize as he played on that the cutback was all he had, he had no feel for pushing the front side of the play. He was good as a blocker again, though. Mike Pouncey, I'm sad to say, did not have a good game. I know some are going to say he did, but he didn't. Not in my eyes. The first thing that jumped out about him is that he seems like he's thin and just getting thinner. He looks like a tight end. And on goal line and short yardage plays? He played like a tight end. That first goal line drive where the Dolphins started 1st & Goal on the 1 yard line and needed four plays to bang it in? Pouncey got knocked strongly backward in every one of the plays, and was responsible for the failure of some of them. Other plays I found when I watched him, you'd see an announcer praising his block and I look at it, and it was only really a passable block. Yet more times you'd watch, and you found that he was not doing his job, was getting pushed around, couldn't stay engaged, etc. The biggest thing is the short yardage, it was scary how consistently and strongly he got knocked backward. The Panther do not boast a strong DL, either.

    9. Offensive Line. I looked at the stat line and I thought I was going to be impressed by them. Short story short, I wasn't. When Lydon Murtha and Nate Garner at Left Tackle are consistently your best run blockers, that's a problem. When Nate Garner, whom we all know should not be playing left tackle, and Richie Incognito are consistently your best pass protectors, you've got a problem. Jake Long needs to get back, and I'm starting to be worried about his status with that knee. The right side of this offensive line is AWFUL. Absolutely awful. Since Tony Sparano took over the Dolphins, I've not seen him start a player worse than Marc Colombo. That's the honest truth. He's gone through guys like Andy Alleman, Ikechuku Ndukwe, John Jerry, Pat McQuistan...I've never seen one worse than Colombo. He was a waste of space out there. No flexibility, no agility, no burst, his arms get lazy, he's on the ground a lot, and then he lobbed a false start on top of everything just for good measure. If Nate Garner doesn't start over him then they don't really know what they're doing on the offensive line, sorry to say. I know that seems arrogant, say what you will about it, it's just the truth. The problem is, Vernon Carey is just NOT much better. He doesn't have the flexibility or body control to be a guard. You need to be able to move to be a guard. You need to be able to fire low in short yardage situations, get out into space, adjust quickly in zone. He's not doing any of those things. He's better than Colombo but his instincts and skill set are not good at Right Guard. I would end that experiment summarily and either make him my Right Tackle, or cut him. It's sad but as I'm watching the game, I'm thinking that the team might even be better off starting Lydon Murtha at Right Tackle and then having Nate Garner play Right Guard. People get too caught up in "this guy is athletic enough for this" or "this guy is a big, powerful mauler" etc. What you need on the line are five guys that DO THEIR JOBS. And then once you get that, you work them together as a five man unit as much as you can, and go to battle with it. But most run plays looked the same. They were a zone play to the right, the right side would collapse and have no lanes, and something would open on the back side (left side) because of key blocks by Murtha, Garner, Incognito, etc. And Incognito pulled in this game A LOT. Color me a little unexcited about the prospect of turning Richie Incognito into a pulling specialist. And I'm not a fan of pulling guards on the goal line, either. I don't know what the HELL this regime are doing on the OL, and it's supposed to be their area of expertise.

    10. Receivers. For what it's worth, I thought they were doing a pretty good job out there. There's still a level of disconnect with Brandon Marshall, you can sense it. There's too much forcing of the ball to him in situations when it really wasn't the best read IMO, and not enough getting the ball to him in situations and circumstances where he can kill the defense. I don't know what to do about that. But Davone Bess did OK especially on that 2nd & 15 completion where he got behind Kendric Burney in man coverage. Lucky for Davone, Burney is probably the only defensive back he'll run into this year that he can beat in a straight up foot race. Hartline continues to do what he's always done...get open. That's what the guy does. He's not the fastest, only has 4.50 type speed, so when you throw him the deep ball you've got to be a little bit more accurate with it. You can't just loft it and let him run under it like Mike Wallace. Anthony Fasano has to shape up. He did well as a blocker but there were times in the passing game where he just didn't look all that interested. And of course, this time Henne hit him on the short out on the front shoulder, and he still dropped the damn ball. Even with that 38 yarder later in the game, Fasano needs to do better. He crossed into a totally wide open zone. Henne did the heavy lifting on that play.
     
  2. muscle979

    muscle979 Season Ticket Holder

    15,863
    6,275
    113
    Dec 12, 2007
    Evans, GA
    It didn't look to me like Marshall's block would have made a difference on that 28 yard run. I'm not sure that defender could have turned and got himself into position fast enough to make a play on Reggie before he ran by. Admittedly though I've only seen the play one time w/ the replay they showed on the broadcast.
     
    2k5, Pandarilla, schmolioot and 2 others like this.
  3. rdhstlr23

    rdhstlr23 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    14,074
    11,142
    113
    Dec 2, 2007
    Chicago, IL
    Why is Brian Hartline slowly becoming one of my favorite players?

    I mean he isn't great, but I feel like he could be pretty damned good with a little more help from Henne.

    Here's what I said last night and it was totally glanced over....

    Reggie Bush looked explosive. He looked like a player that has the ability to make plays on the football field. He looked a like a player willing to do the things a big time player does. He looked worth the investment the Miami Dolphins made. I hope it carries onto the regular season.

    Chad Henne looked the same. He did all of the the things we've seen him do well. He's a very good short/intermediate passer. He continued to struggle on throws down the field. This offense will never consistently make big plays if he's unable to make the throws. The problem is that he doesn't even give them a CHANCE to make a play. The overthrows are worse than an INT. They really are. Forget the INT:TD ratio stats. He's got to be able to at least give them a chance. If he does, will there be criticism? Of course. And rightfully so. However, not giving a WR a chance to make a play is a double negative.

    I will say this to Chad Henne's credit. He's improved his mobility. He's much more able and willing to scramble. The big play to Fasano was a nice play created by him moving out of the pocket and looking down field. The big scramble run was another nice play. He looks to be improved in that area. However, after a nice showing in the 1st preseason game to Hartline, he showed the same inconsistently and inability to make big plays that upsets you as a fan.

    Brian Hartline is a good player. I'm tired of debating it. He finds ways to get open. Use all the bull crap you want, to say how he gets open deep, but he CONSISTENTLY beats DB's. He's a nice player and a good draft by Ireland.

    The defense played well. The lack of pass rush on 4 down lineman worries me a LITTLE. I really think we worked on a few blitz packages on purpose here. Kevin Burnett looked great in coverage.
     
    Anonymous likes this.
  4. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    That seems to be the popular opinion on the Reggie run and admittedly, I may have the wrong read on it.
     
    Pandarilla and muscle979 like this.
  5. RoninFin4

    RoninFin4 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    24,318
    48,554
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Was impressed with both Dansby and Burnett tonight. Burnett looks good in coverage. As CK noted, pass-rush from someone other than Cameron Wake has to happen, and soon. Still not sure why they flipped Vontae Davis and Sean Smith. I did notice Smith made a nice force play on a run to his side; he missed the tackle, but Karlos Dansby was there to clean it up. Vontae probably makes that play.
     
  6. Zeke0123

    Zeke0123 message board *******

    5,596
    3,610
    113
    Nov 22, 2007
    Sorry CK I'm not seeing that same horrific play from Columbo... I saw one play out of both games that he actuallly got "beat"...does he look ugly? Sure does but ugly doesn't always = garbage..jmo from watching the games.
     
    GMJohnson, Paul 13 and MrClean like this.
  7. RoninFin4

    RoninFin4 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    24,318
    48,554
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    I do think you have to consider who Colombo's gone against in both preseason games. While he hasn't given up a sack, he does not look like he's moving well in pass-protection. Looks very stiff/mechanical.
     
    NaboCane and dolfan32323 like this.
  8. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    107,313
    92,982
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    Orygun
    Most of the ten thoughts was pretty good, but this is the one thing I disagree with the most. Since Colombo seems to be the favorite whipping boy of many fans here, I've focused on him when I've reviewed the games a 2nd time. In two games so far, he has only had one really bad play that I could see. That was on the incomplete pass to Hilliard, right before the first FG. He had two pass rushers coming at him, one to each side and he didn't react well and ended up not blocking either one. On every other pass play, I've not seen him allow a pressure, a hit or a sack. I don't see him on the ground a lot when run blocking either. Other than near the goal line, where both lines are trying to get lower than the other. His run blocking in the Atlanta game wasn't very good, but it wasn't for any of the five starters. The run plays in that game were very basic designs it seemed to me and overall poor cohesion for the entire line. In the Carolina game, Colombo made several good run blocks. When he is run blocking on plays other than short yardage, I think he stays on his feet very well. He isn't pretty but for the most part would lock on and sustain long enough. He also got out to the 2nd level and effectively blocked the LBers on a few plays. I never saw any run play where Colombo's man got free of him in time to disrupt and turn the play into a negative for the offense. In pass blocking, early he was going againt Charles Johnson, their best pass rusher, and handled him just fine. Johnson later moved over to RDE and was able to bull rush Murtha back almost into Henne and force a holding call. Everette Brown played LDE later, and he wasn't as easy an assignment for Colombo. A couple of pass plays were short drops and quick releases and he was able to block Brown long enough, but the latter disengaged a moment after Henne released the pass and had he held the ball a second longer, Brown may have been disruptive. Bottom line though, was he wasn't, that I could see anyway.

    IMO, your criticism seems overly harsh, things like waste of space and worst starter ever. I totally do not agree. Nate Garner, whom you think Tony should start at RT, did not do well there against Atlanta. The man he was blocking, Sidbury I believe, got past him to hit Moore just as he was releasing the pass that got intercepted. Had Moore been kept clean, he'd have probably overthrown the pass and no int. IMO anyway. That play was the worst one, but Garner struggled on other pass plays too, and we often saw Moore having to run for his life.
    I do agree with you though that your comment about the coaches not knowing what they are doing, if Garner does not start over Colombo, does sound arrogant. What you are calling the truth, I would say is more accurately an opinion, since you said to say what we will about it.
     
  9. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    On Brian Hartline the first thing you look at is the fact that he's BIG. He looks kind of skinny for his size but he's really lengthy at about 6'2" with some long limbs. He's got a lot of experience as a track player. I think he and Ginn used to compete with each other in track. I think the speed thing is way too talked about, and unfortunately I do think that his skin color does play into expectations. He could have the same speed profile, what he ran at his Pro Day, his track history, etc...and if he were a darker hue then I think his speed would get talked about less. Just my opinion, not trying to raise race issues here or call anyone racist or anything. He has a lot of body control and he's very smart. One of the first things he did in a Miami uniform that got my attention was adjust on a ball in the end zone that Henne threw where he tried to throw him open, and he just made the adjustment so easily it stuck out to me that this is a guy that is a smart player.

    He gets credit for being a little bit more of a RAC player than he actually is. I think on short stuff he's not really all that interesting a RAC player at all. He's not powerful enough to break tackles like Marshall, nor quick enough to change directions like Bess. But he will tend to have a lot of YAC in his career because of the deep and intermediate ball where I feel he's proven adept at staying on his feet after the catch and continuing to run. That was something he showed at Ohio State too.

    They did a really good job when they recognized him as a diamond in the rough, because he wasn't very productive at Ohio State. In fact, tomorrow, the NFL will either draft or not draft the guy that was blamed for Hartline's struggles with production at Ohio State. Back in 2008 he only caught 21 balls, and Terrelle Pryor was blamed. Brian Robiskie caught twice as many passes.

    And yet, even at Ohio State, Hartline had 23 yard per catch average in his final year. He caught 21 passes for 479 yards and 4 TDs. And in his career in the NFL he's consistently averaged about 15 yards per catch here too. And of course this preseason he's got 2 catches for 55 yards, and we all saw him get open on that other play-action streaker in the Carolina game...ball just barely overthrown. For not being a valid deep threat the guy keeps producing like one. And then you add up all the penalties he's drawn in his career, for some reason this guy draws a TON of holding and pass interference penalties.
     
    Anonymous, Boik14, Dolfan984 and 3 others like this.
  10. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    I have a very different read on it, but I guess there's nothing wrong with that. I could almost not find a single play of Colombo's where I actually liked what he was showing. He's very lumbering, can't control his own body anymore. His arms are down, the mark of getting lazy. He's not able to move well. And he's gotten beaten way more than just one time in these games, IMO. He's literally the worst OL that I have seen play for this regime since they took over in 2008. It's not just a "whipping boy" thing. I know over at another board there's a former coach there whose opinions I've come to trust quite a bit, and he disagrees with me strongly about Reggie Bush and some other things but he agrees that Colombo looks absolutely terrible.
     
  11. ToddsPhins

    ToddsPhins Banned

    29,125
    7,721
    0
    Mar 15, 2009
    You might view almost 200 yards passing, 62.5%, and 8+ avg through a glass is half empty perspective. I choose to see it through half full..... or completely full, nearly pouring over the top (with all things considered).

    I appreciate your effort; however, IMO it seems as though you are nitpicking.

    Henne had an outstanding half, showed great command of the offense, and if Sparano allowed him to throw the ball inside the 20 rather than testing the Oline and Thomas, he'd have a TD or 2.

    Great job, Henne. Keep up the improvements and solid work.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 21, 2011
    MarinePhinFan and GMJohnson like this.
  12. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    I kind of agree with Ck about Pouncey, he looks positively gaunt, like maybe 280 pds or so thin.

    As for Bush, he was highly productive, brought a spark to the offense that many thought Brandon Marshall was going to bring last season, and he showed toughness, though I suspect the whole running into the back of the OL has more to do with how they want the rb's to play after Ronnie B's dancing with the stars bit in the backfield last yr.

    I think Marshall is another Dolphins player who slimmed down, he does not look as thick as he did last season.

    I suspect the performance down at the goal line will concern Sparano the most, and with Sparano, he typically does not blame the Oline, he blames the running back, so if a good power back shakes loose for that role do not be surprised if he lands in Miami to be a sort of closer down at the goal line as neither DT nor Lexxy really are "power backs", they are more slasher types of backs, Bush isn't either, that leaves Polite and Sheets and Grigsby, and Polite is the blocker.
     
    texanphinatic likes this.
  13. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    107,313
    92,982
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    Orygun
    He went up against Kroy Biermann and Lawrence Sidbury in the Atlanta game. Biermann is no Abraham, but he ain't bad. Against Carolina, he went up against Charles Johnson, Everette Brown and Eric Norwood. He handled Johnson just fine, and Johnson is a fine pass rusher. I agree he does not look pretty, but to me, when I consider OL, I look at the bottom line, no style points given.
     
    GMJohnson and Paul 13 like this.
  14. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    I wouldn't say "tremendous" TP, I'd say "improved", he showed some things like taking the bad snap and hitting Fasano down the field on the run, and running down to the 5 yd line or so, those were things Henne was not known for doing before. He still has accuracy issues down the field but another area of improvement in his game..he has not had the ball tipped at the LoS as of yet this preseason, that has plagued him as well.

    IIRC the pass to Marshall on 4th down was pretty much a throwaway that looked like a tipped pass?
     
    texanphinatic likes this.
  15. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    You know, someone else asked in the thread that got shut down how I was watching the game, whether it was a stream, etc. Was it Zeke? I forget. Anyway I watch all the preseason games on the NFL.com's Preseason Live feature. It's wide screen, high def, I don't think there was any skew in the video to where Pouncey would look skinnier to me on the feed than he would on television.

    I just a saw a guy that looked skinny, very first thing I noticed, before the game even began.

    But what disturbed me is far too often he played like a skinny guy. In those goal line and short yardage situations he was getting knocked backward. And on the run plays, especially the kinds of runs that Miami seemed to favor, his ability to get out into the second level and do some damage was masked by deficiencies elsewhere on the line, specifically at Right Guard and Right Tackle.

    He didn't go out there and just look awful on every play. I thought he did his job most of the time which is what you want. But there were serious deficiencies in short yardage and power situations, and like I said the area of strength he has where he could really set himself apart from the others ends up drowned a little bit.
     
  16. RoninFin4

    RoninFin4 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    24,318
    48,554
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Did Sparano not allow him to throw the ball, or does he not trust him to throw the ball in the redzone? I didn't watch his presser from yesterday, so if he said that specifically, pretend I didn't type this post. That said, Henne's redzone accuracy was pretty bad last year in my opinion, which is why I questioned the play-calling near the goaline in my game review thread.
     
  17. Paul 13

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,116
    54,275
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    First I would like to echo what CK said about the TOS and point out that there is a "report this post" feature (little triangle with an exclamation point). That if you feel a post violates the TOS, rather than say so in the thread and thus add negatively to the discussion at hand, simply report the post and let the MODS do what they do.

    Now then, I'm going to repost this as I feel it's relevant to the topic at hand.


    I went back and saw the first four drives again just now and focused on the o line play specifically. I wanted to make sure I saw things the way I thought I did the first time. It's always difficult the first time around because you're not pausing and rewinding the game when you watch it live, you're not focusing on the line play specifically. It's hard to see who is winning and who isn't without looking at each player.

    I do value your opinion CK. However, I don't always agree and this time I strongly disagree with your assessment of the offensive line in the first half of this game.

    The first drive was killed by Lydon Murtha and his penalty on 3rd and nine. He's going up against Charles Johnson and IMO he's the best pass rusher on the Panther team. So naturally Murtha is going to struggle. He was lined up on him one on one, no help. And if this had been a regular season game, I wonder if Murtha would have received help or not. Going back in time to the first Daniel Thomas run, the Dolphins tried pulling both Carey and Pouncey to the right. It was ugly as neither player looked good pulling. Both missed their blocks and Thomas was unceremoniously swallowed up. Incog also pulled on this drive and he didn't look good either. Pulling is not a strong suit of any of these linemen. The pass blocking however was solid across the board, except for the Murtha penalty. IMO all the linemen did good enough on that drive with the pass blocking. Also, a lot of quick passes designed to make it easier on all involved, a lot of three step drops by Henne on this drive.

    The second drive saw our best run blocking of the night IMO, especially against the Panther first team D. The one play inparticular on 2nd and 5 was the Reggie Bush long run. All OL was blocking straight ahead on that play. the strong side was good enough at the point of attack, but the backside guys once Reggie made his cutback were superb. Pouncey, Incog and Murtha all had excellent blocks. 1st and ten, the next run by Reggie, Incog pulls, he does okay but Fasano blocks down on Colombo's guy and #71 has nobody to block, which leaves Fasano's lber to make the tackle untouched on Bush. A three yard run that would have gone a long ways had Fasano blocked the right guy IMO. Incog did pull, but he takes the outside guy instead of Fasano's guy. Did he block the wrong guy too? I'm not sure. The next play, 2nd and 7 sees a lot happening. The Panthers blitz, DT picks up a great block allowing Henne to complete the short drop, quick throw to Marshall for the first down. It was a quick decision by #7, great play, all due to the solid pickup by Thomas. Incidentally, Colombo was beaten to the outside on that play. Again, a good thing it was a quick throw against the blitz. After the Hartline overthrow by Henne (which included solid blocking up front), the 2nd and ten run by Bush saw some solid blocking again aided by a 15 yard facemask at the end of the run. Pouncey gets a great block on his guy, driving him completely out of the play. Incog gets to the second level, good quickness in getting there but he just can't complete the block on the backer who has inside leverage and gets a hold of Bush to make the tackle (by the facemask again). Also, the blocking straight ahead on the right side by Carey and Colombo is very good. The next play is a 1st and 10 and Murtha is driven back by Charles Johnson, forcing him to hold once ChadVick makes the decision to step up. A nice play for Chad there as he shows good pocket awareness and hits Hartline for the gain. But it's called back on the Murtha hold. At this point Sparano is beside himself regarding Murtha and knows he's going to pull him for Garner on the next drive. The long pass next to Bush on 1st and 20, where Henne hits him in stride is a great throw. The pass blocking was solid, but it's aided by the dirt infield.

    This is extremely important to note IMO, now then about the dirt infield, the OL clearly can't get any footing on this crap. This is where the drive takes four rushes to get into the end zone. Once the ball gets to the 2 yard line, the d line is getting a jump out of the grass while the o line is blocking form the dirt. You tell me which side is going to win that battle of the trenches? It's horrible. We were fortunate to score, given the hard headedness of the play calling to keep pounding it in there, play after play. It was difficult to watch. It was screaming for a play action pass, or a naked bootleg call.

    The 3rd drive was where we saw Garner come in and do okay at left tackle. The first play is a five yard straight ahead run. Pouncey and Colombo had good blocks on this play. 2nd and five, again a quick pass, so the o line is aided once again, quick completion to Bess. Next play, 1st and 10, quick pass to Marshall, pass blocking good enough again to allow Henne to get the ball out. 2nd and three, that's Bush's long run where it's called back by Marshall's block in the back. I do think Bush had the edge anyway, #19 didn't need to even touch his guy. This is where I note the TV coverage is pissing me off with their replays cutting into the beginning of the following play. I can't get a good look at who is lined up and who is getting a good start to the play. After a nice pass by Henne to Hartline on 2nd and six, the resulting first down play sees Pouncey have his worst run block of the night. The play still goes for five yards as the rest of the o line get good blocks. But Pouncey does get beat by his guy, even though he makes the tackle five yards downfield. On 2nd and 5, Daniel Thomas gets his most explosive run of the night. I thought the left side of the line did an awesome job on this play. Fasano, Garner, Incog and Pouncey all get great blocks. Next play on 1st and 10 and this is where the drive starts to fizzle after the end around call to Gates. He shows his speed by making it to the sideline (he really is a rocket out there), but the blocking is all messed up. Hopefully this will be the last end around we see for a long time. On 2nd and 13, thats the screen to Bush that falls incomplete. Incog, Pouncey and Carey all get out into space and neither one of them can get a block one one Panther linebacker. This drive ended with Henne firing incomplete on fourth down to Marshall. Henne just didn't trust his blocks, especially by Thomas, who completely up endeded the much larger Carolina defender. But the O line held up well. Henne just got rid of it too fast and his timing was completely off with Marshall.

    The fourth and last drive that I watched was against the Panther backups. I will note that on this drive we saw more seven step drops than we saw on the first three drives. Also #76 Murtha is back in on this drive. The overthrow to Gates, Murtha is pushed back into Henne. It was only a four man rush.

    In summation. The negative for me was Murtha. And that's what I noted in my Good / Bad thread yesterday. He was the only one that struggled. The one with the highest grade IMO was Pouncey, A- or B+. I just like what I'm seeing from the rookie. He makes one bad play and immediately makes up for it on the next. I would give Incog, Carey and Colombo all passing grades in the B area. Incog is the main puller. He's the best at it, the power run where he pulls is our best pulling play. He is good enough to get to the next level and do some damange. Is he going to make the Pro Bowl? of course not. I thought Carey was again serviceable at RG. His pass blocking was very good all night. In the pass blocking category, I would rate him 2nd next to Pouncey. I don't see the problem you see with Colombo. Were the plays designed to get the ball out of Henne's hands quickly so as to not expose the poor blocking up front? Maybe. But he held up okay, and once Jake comes back, Murtha will not be supplanting him at RT, I can guarantee that right now. The penalties by Murtha have to drop him below a C. When we pulled guys, it was mostly Incognito doing the pulling. Pouncey rarely pulled and I expected us to do more pulling with him considering what he is. Clearly, pulling is not our strong suit, which IMO is straight ahead, one on one, good old fashioned straight ahead drive blocking and will only get better once Jake Long gets back. Does that lend itself to what we do offensively? It will have to. I certainly didn't see things the same way you did. :wink2:
     
  18. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    That's a pretty fundamental disagreement between us then, because what you deem to be "style points" are actually just the evaluations of ability, efficiency and effectiveness that allow coaches and scouts to project how well players translate into different situations, for instance when real bullets start firing and it's not just preseason anymore.
     
  19. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    107,313
    92,982
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    Orygun
    I'm watching the game again right now and Pouncey was standing next to Carey on the sidelines, and even with that old wide body next to him Pouncey didn't look skinny, gaunt, what have you, to me.
     
    Section126 and Sceeto like this.
  20. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    I noticed him on a play in the infield dirt, and it just hit me "wow, he looks thin", which is fine as Dwight Stephenson was also a smaller Center who had quick hands and explosiveness, but if he is over 300 pds then he had a 10 pd egg omelet for breakfast Mr C.
     
    ckparrothead likes this.
  21. BigDogsHunt

    BigDogsHunt Enough talk...prove it!

    22,422
    9,819
    0
    Nov 27, 2007
    DC Metro Area
    About Hartline, for me, its because with his mustache, he looks like Nick Nolte in North Dallas Forty! Like a WR like that.:up: - every NFL team needs one!

    [​IMG]
     
  22. ToddsPhins

    ToddsPhins Banned

    29,125
    7,721
    0
    Mar 15, 2009
    He was testing the Oline and Daniel Thomas to see what they were capable of.
     
  23. Paul 13

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,116
    54,275
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    I think anyone would look skinny next to Carey's 340+ :lol:
     
  24. Sethdaddy8

    Sethdaddy8 Well-Known Member

    13,006
    6,368
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    NJ
    The problem was Marshall shoving the guy in the back, and subsequent belly flop.

    What can Marshall do here, with that perfect positioning? Can he sort of pull up short and pick the player? How does that scenario turn into a non penalty with a defender who's back is to the blocker, and an offensive mate who is often rewriting the script?


    ---
    - Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  25. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    107,313
    92,982
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    Orygun
    That's just it, even next to Carey, I didn't formulate any thoughts that Pouncey looked abnormally skinny. He isn't packing any extra fat around the midsection either though. As linemen go, I'd say he is lean, which means he has more body density and therefore weigh heavier then he appears to.
     
    Steve-Mo and Paul 13 like this.
  26. rafael

    rafael Well-Known Member

    27,364
    31,261
    113
    Apr 6, 2008
    If Marshall had just stood there and did nothing then Bush has the exact same gain and it isn't called back.
     
  27. Tin Indian

    Tin Indian Rockin' The Bottom End

    7,929
    4,405
    113
    Feb 10, 2010
    Palm Bay Florida
    1. I agree, I don't think that block sprung Bush free. In addition, I didn't really think Bush was dancing around much either, in fact I thought he did a pretty good job of making something of nothing if the play wan't there. I do agre that the Panthers had very poor outside containment. Frankly, I was far more impressed by Reggie than I ever thought I'd be.

    2. All enthusiasm must be tempered by the reality that we played the worst team in football last year. Carolina has a long way to go. We are neither as bad as we lokked against Atlanta nor as good as we looked against Carolina.

    3. Defensively we had far more going on than we did the week before as you mentioned a number of different blitz's and things. It would be nice to keep some of that stuff held back but time is short and this preseason is different.

    4. I also think the lack of pressure up front was troubling. I really haven't been thrilled with the guys up front on the d line yet. I expect more from these guys because they are one of the strengths of our team.

    5. Dansby and Burnett are the best pair of ILB's we've had since switching to the 3-4. Dansby made the 1st 3 tackles in the game and was I thought very impressive all the way around. I didn't see any real eveidence of him having problem against the run, and I thought he was pretty decent in his pass coverage when needed. Burnett is just what the doctor ordered for covering the TE's that have been eating our lunch the last few years. I am pretty pleased with what I've seen of him.

    6. I have been very diappointed with Henne going back to last season. I think we all were looking for him to step up and he never did. There is no point in crying about him now because he is what we have again this year. Like it or not. That my have been the best I've seen him play, he didn't connect on any of the long passes which he really need to get better on, he should probably heed Griese's advice on that, but I was very encouraged about him actually hitting receivers in stride. He normally is very bad at that and I've noticed the same thing about his seeming preference for stationary targets or come back routes. He has to hit these guys in stride on a consistent basis and give them a chance to help him. That throw to the sideline in the 2nd scared me to death, bad decision and bad execution. If he decides to make that throw he had better throw it with alot more on it than he had. The reality is he should never have made that throw.

    7. I am very encouraged by what I've seen from Dabolls offense thus far. Far more activity and variations in the passing formations as well as routes. I like what he did to get Bush in the game. I liked the way he got Marshall in the game early and often. It was a far cry from last years disjointed play calling and there weren't any ill timed reverses or Wild Cat plays. Quite refreshing. We'll see how he looks when the bullets fly though and he has to make a real game plan against the Pats and the Jets.

    8. The rookies. Pouncey is looking Ok thus far, yes he had the one high snap in the shotgun, but Henne did a good job maintaining focus and completed the throw. He seems to be moving fairly well, I saw him in the 2nd level a couple of times on run plays. I agree he needs to hold his ground better on short yardage and generate more push but he looks like the best line acquisition since Long. Duh. I haven't noticed his weight though. Gates needs more work. He is a very raw prospect but they need to get him up to speed and on the field. If for nothing more than fly routes to blow the top off the coverage and get the safety out of the way. We'll see. Livas flashed in the 1st game and not so much in the 2nd. He needs to learn how to produce when teams are actually focusing on him. Thomas I disagree on. I can't speak to Stevan Ridley because I haven't seen him, but after he got going he looked like he has a bit more going on than what you suggest. He seemed to hit the hole pretty hard and fast after he was in the game a bit. Looks like he has more quickness than Brown had last year. He has good hands and while not elusive seems like he can make defenders miss. Have to watch him more.

    9. The O-line. The Sparano project all I can say is I'm glad Jake is back practicing.

    10. Recievers. I like the group of guys we have on the field this year. Some good competition this year the one thing I don't understand is the animosity to Hartline that is on this board. He is constantly banged on for being slow, yet he is faster than any other reciever on the team last year. He runs good routes and has good hands. The Tight ends are another story, after a good 1st year with us Fasano has gotten progressively worse at catching the ball and we don't seem to have a legitimate pass catching threat at that position.
     
    dolfan32323 and ckparrothead like this.
  28. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    107,313
    92,982
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    Orygun
    If Marshall pulls up short and does not initiate the contact, perhaps raise his hands to show the officials he isn't attempting to block, I don't believe he'd get flagged.
     
  29. Desides

    Desides Well-Known Member

    38,949
    20,033
    113
    Nov 28, 2007
    Pembroke Pines, FL
    Personally, I think it comes down to a plain old ability to make defenses pay for neglecting him. And defenses absolutely neglect him. Can we blame them? They're facing Marshall, Bess, and now Bush. Are they going to be worried about a 4.5 guy breaking their coverage? Likely not.
     
    GMJohnson and ckparrothead like this.
  30. RoninFin4

    RoninFin4 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    24,318
    48,554
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    I don't doubt you, but did he say that in the presser?
     
  31. Disgustipate

    Disgustipate Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    32,158
    58,018
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    The funny thing is, no one is seeing it, because it isn't there. People are preemptively reacting towards it in the absence of the actual stimulus of Columbo playing poorly. He doesn't really deserve any particularly strong adjectives, either way.
     
    GMJohnson and Paul 13 like this.
  32. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    107,313
    92,982
    113
    Nov 30, 2007
    Orygun
    I never noticed Hartline having a mustache now.
     
  33. Paul 13

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,116
    54,275
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    And imagine when we sneak Gates in for Hartline...
     
  34. vt_dolfan

    vt_dolfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    One thing I have noticed...is that....for people who really STUDY game tape.....and you know who you are.....you tend to see things differently then say someone who regularly watches every Phin game...and may even rewatch a Phins game a few times. The reason being....they have different perspectives on many different players...and how they play that same position...and can then relate it back to evaluating a particular player. Henne for example....I watch him play...and I thought he had a nice solid game. I rewatched him on different occasions....enough to form a fairly elementary position on how he played.

    But I dont watch a ton of other QB's....nearly as much. I dont break down their feetwork...their reads....etc.

    So...there is certainly many aspects of Henne's night...that I didnt look for...not because Im not capable...but because I dont know enough to look for something specific.

    I thought CK's analysis was articulated very well....and I have no doubt very accurate, based on the amount of experience that he has breaking down film, and what he personally prefers to see in a player. I thought Henne played better then adequate more much of the game....especially in how he handled the offense. I cant really speak to the OLine play...because frankly....I dont know enough about it to add anything relevant to the conversation. I thought Murtha seemed to take the steam out of our offense on a few occasions.....

    I really liked a few things not mentioned...I thought Clay looked fast...and catches the ball VERY nicely. I cant figure out why he hasnt been playing much....but...I think Fasano is a better blocker...and we have been playing alot of spread offense...so maybe thats why....

    I was impressed with Grigsby's blocking.....especially for a smaller guy.

    I love the space created by Daboll's offense.....to me....if Chad Henne is a guy that has problems going through his reads....giving him more options means he is more likely to make a good play. I can see how this is a QB friendly offense....
     
    Steve-Mo and ckparrothead like this.
  35. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    Hopefully they'll look at Gates and confuse him for Davone Bess, because of the dreads and his number also starting with a "1". We should put him in the slot to enhance this effect, maybe changes his number to 16 which can be tough to tell apart from a 15 on the field sometimes.
     
    Paul 13 likes this.
  36. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Hmm, I'd still take Hartline, as he is just a more polished Wr who does make plays inbetween the hashmarks and does get open down the field and is a proven blocker.

    Though I suspect Gates and Wallace will get some run this yr, both Beast and Hartline miss time with injuries just due to their playing style, to their credit they appeared to have realized that Wr's just do not stay healthy in the NFL and have adjusted accordingly.
     
  37. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    You touch on something important and that is perspective. You can't evaluate these players in a vacuum. It's the reason why I focus so much attention on NFL preseason and regular season games every year instead of just evaluating college players for the Draft which I feel is something a lot of people in the Draft business do and it's a mistake. You need to see them all so that you have an idea what you should be looking for, so that you don't get trapped in seeing something mediocre and thinking it's good enough. I'm not saying other people here don't do exactly that, I'm sure they do, I'm just agreeing with you and reiterating that it's important.
     
    vt_dolfan likes this.
  38. Larryfinfan

    Larryfinfan 17-0...Priceless Club Member

    Now, this is where I disagree...I'd love for Henne to hit more often on the deeper passes, but just the fact that he's throwing them has to make D's think about it...the fact that a) we can get a WR past a CB and b) that Henne has the time to throw the ball deep is a threat. I don't think the overthrows are a complete detriment to the offense. Henne hasn't turned the corner because of this one game and he didn't regress because of the one bad game last week. The differences I saw in this game was more along the lines that we've opened up the O just a bit and done some things to get the ball to our better playmakers. I think the chemistry between Henne and Marshall is much better.

    I also have to agree with you on Hartline...I've been a proponent of securing more speed on this team offensively, but Hartline continues to be in the right place at the right time, despite his athletic deficiencies as a WR and he's only going to get better. The combination of Marshall, Bess and Hartline works. Now if Moore/Wallace/Clay can step up and inject yet another element, it could be even better.

    I'm still a bit sour on Fasano, although there are certainly worse TEs in the league. He's solid but not spectacular. If Clay/Epps/Moore/Wallace/Bush can provide what he doesn't, [big play ability] then he'll do just fine. After seeing what Daboll did with Hillis and his particular skillset, then he may be able to do the same with what our guys bring to the table...
     
  39. Tin Indian

    Tin Indian Rockin' The Bottom End

    7,929
    4,405
    113
    Feb 10, 2010
    Palm Bay Florida
    That's a good thought.
     
  40. Paul 13

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,116
    54,275
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    I really want to reiterate the offensive line and how difficult I believe it was for them to get any kind of traction when we were first and goal from the dirt **** infield. Especially when the ball was moved to the two and the Panthers had the advantage of standing on the grass while we were stuck standing on clay. It's understandable that our guys got pushed back or gained zero ground, you try to get lower than someone in those situations. Does that mean I'm making excuses for them?
     

Share This Page