That is one of the risks, can Sparano get through to him? I think he can, Incognito was the dirtiest player in the NFL and we had no problems from him.
All NFL receivers have talent. However after Clayton they are all scrubs. Also even Clayton is pretty scrubby.
Don't know tbh about it, Vick squared himself away Young will be in for a bit of a shock when no way claims him on Waivers. Though it wouldn't surprise to see the Titans land a token draft pick for him and Young renegotiating his way overpriced deal.
Vick also had the added motivation of being financially ****ed. I'm sure getting the IRS off his *** is a great way to keep focused. VY already got ridiculously overpaid and I could completely see him breaking down and just walking away from football.
And BAL still is. If anything that looks worse for BAL and their talent evaluation. I bet they'd of rather had Clayton than Stallworth and esp Houshmandzada in their last playoff game.
Thought it was Bankruptcy? Like his mom would lose the house he bought her? Hard to tell, but I would not be surprised if whatever teams that were interested hired investigators to see what he is up to before they do anything..surprises are only fun on Birthdays and Christmas.
Did you watch the last play of the game? I think that's a pretty easy conclusion to make. Clayton was probably cut bc they were dumb enough to waste money on Housh.
Maybe. But I didn't see him crying about not getting the ball and then dropping a wide-open 4th down conversion that hit him in the chest.
but he did get cut for a guy who was crying about not getting the ball and then dropped a wide-open 4th down conversion that hit him in the chest. mostly because he was nto as good as the guy who was crying about not getting the ball and then dropped a wide-open 4th down conversion that hit him in the chest.
lol Again, that's on BAL. Housh is garbage at this point in his career, I'd gladly take Clayton over him.
Clayton as been garbage his entire career. When the move was made no one was calling Baltimore stupid. Most thought they upgraded the position. Clayton is another Troy Williamson.
When they cut Clayton, no. When they signed Housh, absolutely. Anyone that watched Housh in SEA was most certainly not singing BAL's praises.
Clayton would be the 4th wide receiver in Seattle. Maybe 5th behind Obamanu. Housh was not great in Seattle, however he was much better than Mark Clayton. He did have 79 catches for 911 yards that year.
4th behind who? Aside from Mike Williams, they don't have another solid WR. Sure Housh had a nice amount of dink and dunk passes, but if you really watched his game it was ugly.
Golden Tate and Deon Butler. I did really watch his game. It might have been ugly but it was better than Mark Clayton's.
Golden Tate? Really? Deon Butler I'd say is at least somewhat close to being debatable, but there's no way he'd be 4th. This debate is pretty pointless.
Their second round pick who makes big plays. Seattle would start him ahead of Mark Clayton. With special teams he might not even be active. I agree, you are the only person I have ever seen say that the Rams had decent wide receivers.
The debate started w/who you'd rather have last year, not this upcoming season. So how many big plays did Tate make last year?
I would rather have Tate last year. Tate would be building experience and still providing a big play ability. Clayton was a scrub with one good season.
And right now Tate is Ted Ginn with one (literally) big play a year. And it's funny that you'd say that about Clayton when we'll both agree that Mike Williams is SEA's best WR.
Mike Williams played really well last season. Not something I would have ever of guessed. Clayton didn't play nearly as well as Mike Williams.
