So here is my dilemma, our fantasy draft is this coming saturday, we have a keeper league and i kept A.J. Green, my buddy who holds the 1st overall pick kept Jarvis Landry, so if he does not pick a QB 1st overall (our league is very QB heavy) and picks Adrian Peterson over Andrew Luck or Aaron Rodgers, i´m pretty sure he would pick Tannehill at 20 or 21st overall, this is something i would absolutley hate not getting him first of all, but also having to deal with this prick and Tannehill and Landry on his team, it would basically kill all my fun all year.....so i pick 10th overall, so i have pick 10 and 11, would you pick Tannehill at 10 or 11 and give him a freaking middle finger in his stupid (believe me it is stupid) face ?
Personally, I'd pick the best players available at 11 and 12 and then give him the middle finger at the end of the year after I've had the better season.
I think there is no way you can reach that high for Tannehill. If he passes at 20/21 you could take him with your next picks. There are too many good players on the board at 10/11 to take him imo.
One thing I learned over my eight years of FF, bias and FF dont mix, which is why I have won my last 3 leagues... I think the only Phin I had in both my leagues last year was Jarvis on my keeper team, unfortunately, I'm keeping Le'Veon Bell, Jeremy Hill and Odell Beckham over Juice (Never let bias ruin your draft)
I fully anticipate getting Tannehill well past 8th-10th round in my draft. It's only a 10 team league, and non Miami fans can easily name 9 fantasy QBs they would rather have