1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Cut-Blocking - Ban it or leave it?

Discussion in 'Other NFL' started by Galant, Aug 7, 2014.

  1. Galant

    Galant Love - Unity - Sacrifice - Eternity

    19,127
    11,058
    113
    Apr 22, 2014
    The Dolphins are, apparently, going to more heavily feature cut-blocking in their defensive scheme.

    Personally this saddens me a bit because shoulder-charges at or below the knee are something I'd like to see removed from the game. They're just too dangerous.

    We all know how we felt when Swearinger removed Keller for the season and, potentially, put an end to/shortened his career.

    Cut-blocking/Diving at the knee is lazy and dangerous. The rules may excuse it for now but it's just a cheap-shot tactic, at the runner's expense, and IMO encourages lazy/poor tackling technique.

    A player who can dive and cut through an opponent's lower legs is also capable of wrapping them up and bringing them down.
    If the health risk weren't there I'd be fine with it, but since we're talking about human locomotives aiming, full-steam, at vulnerable joints, I think it needs to be banned.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2014
    MikeHoncho likes this.
  2. normaldude

    normaldude Active Member

    225
    204
    43
    Oct 13, 2009
    I dislike cut-blocking, but you seem to blur the lines between cut-blocking (done by offensive players) and tackling (done by defensive players).
     
  3. Galant

    Galant Love - Unity - Sacrifice - Eternity

    19,127
    11,058
    113
    Apr 22, 2014
    Good catch. I see them just about equally so that seems to have come out in my writing.
     
  4. Disgustipate

    Disgustipate Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    31,608
    55,634
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    I don't think there is anything wrong with cut blocking. It involves a coach/player making a decision that exposes an opposing player to higher risk, but I think there are other examples of that in the game that are legal and accepted. I'm highly skeptical that cut blocks injure more frequently than say, someone going for a completely legal big hit in a variety of circumstances. They're also something that is not legally performed on a player that has no defense for the technique, which appears to be an important standard the NFL uses to determine legality of actions.

    I think cut blocks stand out in part because they're pretty much the only "high risk" behavior that offensive players can expose defenders to, when most other ones are the reverse kind of situation.
     
  5. Dol-Fan Dupree

    Dol-Fan Dupree Tank? Who is Tank? I am Guy Incognito.

    40,533
    33,035
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    I think hitting a player below the thighs with a shoulder pad should be banned.
     
    texanphinatic likes this.
  6. Galant

    Galant Love - Unity - Sacrifice - Eternity

    19,127
    11,058
    113
    Apr 22, 2014
    Can you give some examples of another legal type of hit or play that directs a strong strike against as weak and important part of the body as regularly as cut-blocking, with as high a chance of major damage being done?
     
  7. Clark Kent

    Clark Kent Fighter of the Nightman

    8,560
    4,133
    113
    May 9, 2008
    It depends. Is cut blocking going to save Ryan Tannehill's life in 2014? If so, I'm against banning it.
     

Share This Page