1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Shanahan or Kubiak??

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by dolfan40, Jan 15, 2014.

  1. dolfan40

    dolfan40 Well-Known Member

    819
    311
    63
    Jul 15, 2013
    Germany
    which one you like more,for my part i like both if then actually i was happy mcadoo is not our oc,now this both Studs(Yeah i call them Studs) are avail Shanahan did wonders with Griffin in the first year!!
     
  2. CitizenSnips

    CitizenSnips hmm.

    5,525
    4,219
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    PA
    They would both utilize tannehill better and our screen game would improve dramatically. Clay and the other TEs would become bigger factors and Wallace would become less of one I think.
     
  3. MikeHoncho

    MikeHoncho -=| Censored |=-

    52,652
    25,565
    113
    Nov 13, 2009
    Kinda bummed about not acquiring Kubiak, but whatevs. Hopefully we got something good in Lazor.
     
  4. PSG

    PSG Clear Eyes. Full Hearts.

    9,767
    3,436
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    North of the Border
    My guess is either one would have been better than Lazor, but thats just a guess.
     
  5. xphinfanx

    xphinfanx Stay strong my friends.

    10,823
    2,214
    113
    Nov 1, 2009
    PSG the teflon wore out on Jeff in your sig he is no longer non stick.
     
  6. MikeHoncho

    MikeHoncho -=| Censored |=-

    52,652
    25,565
    113
    Nov 13, 2009
    Kubiak's health cast doubt on him being able to give 100% to the job IMO.

    Shanahan wouldn't have been bad actually.
     
  7. Sethdaddy8

    Sethdaddy8 Well-Known Member

    13,006
    6,368
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    NJ
    I thought it was going to be Kubiak. Hopeful from what I'm hearing about Lazor tho.
     
  8. rafael

    rafael Well-Known Member

    27,364
    31,261
    113
    Apr 6, 2008
    IMO Lazor was a better fit than either of those. I liked that he was a WCO, zone blocking guy that fits with Philbin, but also was coming from Philly who used all that misdirection and read-option you saw in Oregon. Philly was a team that ran the ball a ton which is important. IMO NFL offense largely depends on passing efficiency and that is helped greatly by running attempts. We'll obviously need to continue to revamp the OL to more zone blocking players, but the mis-direction concepts will help. I didn't feel that Kubiak or Shanahan would have brought as much of that to the run game. Shanahan some b/c of the read option, but I didn't feel he was as detail oriented in the pass game.
     
  9. PSG

    PSG Clear Eyes. Full Hearts.

    9,767
    3,436
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    North of the Border
    I know. Just been lazy....
     
  10. PSG

    PSG Clear Eyes. Full Hearts.

    9,767
    3,436
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    North of the Border
    You are right about Kubiaks health being a potential issue.
    I dont know much about Lazor so I don't really know if he was the best choice or not.
     
  11. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    Get to researching then! I've always been curious what you'd be like with hope and optimism.....:shifty:
     
    bigbucks24 and smahtaz like this.

Share This Page