Suck My Mock!

[Pandarilla]

1. If Blackmon drops then fine. Otherwise, drop and give me twenty (Maybe that TE out of Stanford)

2. Alshon Jeffrey, he's gonna drop, but kid is the only true dynamic player at WR that will be a true red zone threat

3. Take your shot at QB here, Tannehill just doesn't make sense to me at #8, perhaps lower in the round. Plenty of stat-busters to choose from in RD 3

3a. Better make this count Irish, another speedy offensive weapon or prepare for the cliche' "so we got blank for Brandon Marshall!"

4. Traditionally, where Ireland takes a shot at a developmental beefy lineman with promise.

5. Take another stat-buster QB...Why not?

6. Did somebody say Safety?

7. Edge rusher long shot...


I'll see you hell...

[lmeister3]

Huh

[Frumundah Finnatic]

Are you trying to seduce us?

[Pandarilla]

Are you trying to seduce us?

Yes

[Pandarilla]

Huh

No...

[Fin-Omenal]

Your Mock Sucks

[Pandarilla]

Your Mock Sucks

Cool story bro!

[MonstBlitz]

Why is trading down so popular among fans here? I'll take a top 10 player over a Jared Odrick type + another 2nd round bargain bust any day of the week.

[Frumundah Finnatic]

Why is trading down so popular among fans here? I'll take a top 10 player over a Jared Odrick type + another 2nd round bargain bust any day of the week.

Because its what Ireland/Parcells have done twice so far.

[Pandarilla]

You get better value and extra picks unless you're sure about who you want (based on the 12 gamechanger player theory hoisted by Saban)...In this draft nobody really stands out after the top 5 to me. Tough to take a chance on crippling the organization (further) by botching the pick.

[Phyl]

The thing I most want to do with my GM that has a history of botching second round picks is give him additional second round picks.

[Pandarilla]

The thing I most want to do with my GM that has a history of botching second round picks is give him additional second round picks.

That's true, I didn't even take that into account...

[dolfan32323]

We can trade our 2nd rounders for 3rd and 5th round picks then! and then maybe ship those off for multiple 6th and 7th round picks and go gem hunting.

[Pandarilla]

We can trade our 2nd rounders for 3rd and 5th round picks then! and then maybe ship those off for multiple 6th and 7th round picks and go gem hunting.

Kind of a moneyball/outside-the-box technique, I like it and it's the only area Ireland really shines anyway...

[dolfan32323]

Kind of a moneyball/outside-the-box technique, I like it and it's the only area Ireland really shines anyway...

Exactly. We need to play according to our GM's strengths. Maybe we can just focus only on UDFAs?

[Fin D]

You get better value and extra picks unless you're sure about who you want (based on the 12 gamechanger player theory hoisted by Saban)...In this draft nobody really stands out after the top 5 to me. Tough to take a chance on crippling the organization (further) by botching the pick.

I don't understand you guys.

You claim there's only a small amount of people in draft that are impact. You claim our GM can't draft game changing talent. Your solution to those two things?

Trade down to lessen your chance of grabbing an impact player because you're shrinking the pool of players to choose from all to give the GM you don't trust more picks to botch.

I believe that allows me to call into question all of your thoughts and assumptions about the team, the players, the coach and gm.

[dsteve]

what if the browns pass on tanny and we trade down with a shot to get him still? if not we grab weeden or the BPA?

[Pandarilla]

I don't understand you guys.

You claim there's only a small amount of people in draft that are impact. You claim our GM can't draft game changing talent. Your solution to those two things?

Trade down to lessen your chance of grabbing an impact player because you're shrinking the pool of players to choose from all to give the GM you don't trust more picks to botch.

I believe that allows me to call into question all of your thoughts and assumptions about the team, the players, the coach and gm.

I use the 12 gamechangers per draft (Saban) to sort of guide me. Where are the freaks of nature? The Giants got Pierre-Paul at #16! This draft is either mediocre or fantastically level as far as talent...People are hyping the hell out of Richardson (Who is a talented grinder). Even if Irish wants to keep pouring cement on the line, Reiff doesn't exactly jump out at you. I also favor quarterbacks and offensive playmakers due to the rules...I also believe the only thing that you should call into question is your sexual preference (heyoooo!)

[Pandarilla]

what if the browns pass on tanny and we trade down with a shot to get him still? if not we grab weeden or the BPA?

Tannehill is fool's gold. Mallet looked better last year and he went in the third. If Rafael is right and there's some sort of fraternal bonds clouding they're judgement, then prepare for the cactus dildo. I'd take a chance on the kid out of Boise St. in the later rounds if you're thinking vanilla with Weeden.

[Onehondo]

Hmmm...Now that I think about it, we could probably use the cumulative value of all of our draft picks and trade for half of the 6th round or maybe over three quarters of it. With all of those 6th round picks we could dominate the 6th round and have plenty of chances to get a Gem there. Maybe there will even be a 6th round quarterback in there we could grab with no pressure and very low expectations.....? No?