Possible Trade Down Scenario...

[ToddsPhins]

How much we'd like to trade back for Cincy's picks (if Tannehill is gone) should be the answer on how Cincy would feel about giving them up IMO.

I honestly don't see them using both firsts to trade up for Richardson.
I think Trent is one of those situations where he isn't a draft day priority but at some point might represent too much value to not make a slight trade up for, but even that might not happen.






Also, acquiring an extra 2nd rounder that high (#43) would likely cost us our 2013 1st rounder, so I'd pass on that in Alphonso Smith fashion.
If we hypothetically sacrifice a future 1st, it better be to acquire an extra 2012 first. Not a fan of trading 1sts for 2nds.

[Jcouch1021]

How much we'd like to trade back for Cincy's picks (if Tannehill is gone) should be the answer on how Cincy would feel about giving them up IMO.

I honestly don't see them using both firsts to trade up for Richardson.
I think Trent is one of those situations where he isn't a draft day priority but at some point might represent too much value to not make a slight trade up for, but even that might not happen.






Also, acquiring an extra 2nd rounder that high (#43) would likely cost us our 2013 1st rounder, so I'd pass on that in Alphonso Smith fashion.
If we hypothetically sacrifice a future 1st, it better be to acquire an extra 2012 first. Not a fan of trading 1sts for 2nds.

very true, it all comes down to how much they value richardson, i do believe he will be there at our pick. i dont like trading first for seconds either unless there is a guy who we are absolutly sold on being better then a first the following year. i wouldnt mind packaging a 3rd and 5th this year plus a 2nd for a high 2nd and 6th this year