Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: And thats the loophole in the NFL Rulebook

  1. #1
    I BELIEVE! Darrelle Revis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,105
    Thanks (Given)
    2
    Thanks (Received)
    237
    Rep Power
    46

    Thumbs down And thats the loophole in the NFL Rulebook

    On the Patriots last drive, not on the last play (since game cant end on a defensive penalty) but on a few of their last plays the Giants should have put their entire 53 man roster on the field to play defense in order to milk the clock. Sounds crazy right? But its true. Ive said it all year, it doesnt make any sense how there is no such thing as a a pre-snap too many men on the field penalty on the defense. Its only on the defense once the ball is snapped.


    To combat this, the best the Patriots can do is snap the ball and spike it which would run 2 seconds off the clock. Do that enough times and you leave the Patriots with 1 play left to score (since game cant end on a defensive penalty).

    As you saw, this was critical on the Pats last drive. With 17 seconds left, they had a play run 8 seconds off the clock where the Giants have 12 men on the field. 5 Yard penalty on the Giants. But good play for the Giants! Why wouldnt they trade the 5 yards for an 8 second runoff?

    To combat this loophole, either:
    A. Make too many men on the field a pre snap penalty on defenses (just like it is on the offense), or
    B. As my roomate suggested, make too many men on the field penalty in the last 2 minutes of the half, so that the offense should be awarded the yards AND the clock should revert to the amount of time that was left before the play started.
    Darrelle Revis = Greatest Defensive Player of All-Time.


  2. Thanks Boik14, Silverphin, Jt0323, dont fumble, Ronnie Bass thanked for this post
  3. #2
    Super Moderator Boik14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York
    Age
    38
    Posts
    64,761
    Thanks (Given)
    43871
    Thanks (Received)
    21471
    Rep Power
    2070

    Default

    Astute point! That play alone is a reason the pats lost. Lost 8 seconds and couldn't get close enough to take more then 2 shots. Oh well. I'm not exactly crying for the Cheatriots


    Credit to Imeister for this gem...
    [/QUOTE]
    https://youtu.be/qi1LMIUOOAI

    Join The Phins Fantasy Football: http://www.thephins.com/forums/showthread.php?89381-The-Phins-2016-Fantasy-Football

  4. #3
    Starter Layfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    429
    Thanks (Given)
    69
    Thanks (Received)
    204
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Yeah that was pretty dumb.

  5. #4
    Oh hello Muck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sunny Florida
    Posts
    14,321
    Thanks (Given)
    2767
    Thanks (Received)
    21095
    Rep Power
    1455

    Default

    I was saying the exact same thing as it happened. I'd have thrown 15 men out there and give them 5 yards while the clock bled.
    Become and remain familiar with the Forum Rules | Don't retaliate! Report the post () and use the Ignore Feature.


  6. #5
    Chaotic Neutral Paul 13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    69,486
    Thanks (Given)
    30544
    Thanks (Received)
    25799
    Rep Power
    2331

    Default

    But the 12th man had no affect on the specific play involved. It was Tuck (IIRC) walking off the field that was the 12th guy when the ball was snapped. Is it a loophole that should be closed? Absolutely. Did it cost the Pats the game? Absolutely not.

  7. Thanks DeDolfan thanked for this post
  8. #6
    Premium Member padre31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    inching to 100k posts
    Posts
    100,036
    Thanks (Given)
    19303
    Thanks (Received)
    37442
    Rep Power
    3329

    Default

    Personally I think the Defense should take the penalty when the offense has them in bad personnel packages and they are using the no huddle to prevent subs, makes more sense then letting the opponent score or using a timeout.

  9. #7
    Fins Up! Jt0323's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Age
    27
    Posts
    12,544
    Thanks (Given)
    2982
    Thanks (Received)
    6917
    Rep Power
    572

    Default

    I agree 100%. The rule should change to 5 yard penalty plus the time lost

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk

  10. #8
    'Parcells' Guy Nappy Roots's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Bradenton,FL
    Age
    30
    Posts
    9,750
    Thanks (Given)
    2723
    Thanks (Received)
    3631
    Rep Power
    359

    Default

    It can't be yards plus time lost. Because then your not only giving them that, your giving them a absolute free untimed play basically. What's to stop the offenses running around for 2 minutes just trying to gain more then 5 yards? Laterals and stupid stuff like that....no that would ruin it. Keep it how it is. Most of the time to many men doesn't effect the offense, other then giving them a free play, because the 12th man is usually running toward the side line.

  11. Thanks Paul 13, unluckyluciano thanked for this post
  12. #9
    'Parcells' Guy Laces Out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Omaha, Ne
    Posts
    3,499
    Thanks (Given)
    720
    Thanks (Received)
    966
    Rep Power
    101

    Default

    The Patriots poor use of a challenge sure didn't help them. Nor their ability to execute(read:catch the ball) when the chips were down. Perhaps I am being realistic?

  13. #10
    Giggity byroan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NC
    Age
    30
    Posts
    16,955
    Thanks (Given)
    1672
    Thanks (Received)
    16121
    Rep Power
    1121

    Default

    Except for the fact of this rule.

    Rule 12-3-2."The defense shall not commit successive or continued fouls to prevent a score."

    The Pats would have then been given a TD.

  14. Thanks DeDolfan thanked for this post
  15. #11
    Premium Member DeDolfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth Beach
    Age
    67
    Posts
    19,444
    Thanks (Given)
    8958
    Thanks (Received)
    10989
    Rep Power
    888

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darrelle Revis View Post
    On the Patriots last drive, not on the last play (since game cant end on a defensive penalty) but on a few of their last plays the Giants should have put their entire 53 man roster on the field to play defense in order to milk the clock. Sounds crazy right? But its true. Ive said it all year, it doesnt make any sense how there is no such thing as a a pre-snap too many men on the field penalty on the defense. Its only on the defense once the ball is snapped.


    To combat this, the best the Patriots can do is snap the ball and spike it which would run 2 seconds off the clock. Do that enough times and you leave the Patriots with 1 play left to score (since game cant end on a defensive penalty).

    As you saw, this was critical on the Pats last drive. With 17 seconds left, they had a play run 8 seconds off the clock where the Giants have 12 men on the field. 5 Yard penalty on the Giants. But good play for the Giants! Why wouldnt they trade the 5 yards for an 8 second runoff?

    To combat this loophole, either:
    A. Make too many men on the field a pre snap penalty on defenses (just like it is on the offense), or
    B. As my roomate suggested, make too many men on the field penalty in the last 2 minutes of the half, so that the offense should be awarded the yards AND the clock should revert to the amount of time that was left before the play started.
    But there is not too many men on the field until the ball is snapped. You have until then to get off the filed. On O, it's a penalty for having too many men in the huddle, not too many on the filed.
    DD....the #1 Delaware Dolfan..........................



    We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein




  16. #12
    Insensitive to the Touch HardKoreXXX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Coral Springs, FL
    Age
    33
    Posts
    20,630
    Thanks (Given)
    6233
    Thanks (Received)
    14402
    Rep Power
    1125

    Default

    I started a thread on this (just bumped it) a few months ago. It's called The Polish Goal Line Defense and was first used by Buddy Ryan. Major loophole.


    "Making people on the Internet feel better about their own lives since 2004"

  17. #13
    Fins Up! Jt0323's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Age
    27
    Posts
    12,544
    Thanks (Given)
    2982
    Thanks (Received)
    6917
    Rep Power
    572

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laces Out View Post
    The Patriots poor use of a challenge sure didn't help them. Nor their ability to execute(read:catch the ball) when the chips were down. Perhaps I am being realistic?
    I thought thats was a good challenge...if reversed games pretty much over

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk

  18. #14
    Write Travis Write Aqua4Ever04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Age
    28
    Posts
    28,878
    Thanks (Given)
    6047
    Thanks (Received)
    19504
    Rep Power
    1496

    Default

    How is it a loophole? It could happen MAYBE one time then an offense will identify all the players on the field, take the snap, take a knee and achieve their five yards in one second.

  19. #15
    Insensitive to the Touch HardKoreXXX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Coral Springs, FL
    Age
    33
    Posts
    20,630
    Thanks (Given)
    6233
    Thanks (Received)
    14402
    Rep Power
    1125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aqua4Ever04 View Post
    How is it a loophole? It could happen MAYBE one time then an offense will identify all the players on the field, take the snap, take a knee and achieve their five yards in one second.
    You're almost guaranteed to kill 8 seconds with it. There's no way in Hell an offense is going to notice that pre-snap and spike the ball. Even if they did notice, they're most likely going to take a shot to get a free play. When there's 20 second left in the game, it's a pretty nice advantage for the defense to have.

    The only thing that could be done, would be to put the time back on the clock and replay the down. OR give the offense a completely untimed down. Meaning, the clock would not start for next play, at all. Basketball has rules to prevent teams from doing similar things (you can't foul a guy without the ball in the last two minutes, etc.)


    "Making people on the Internet feel better about their own lives since 2004"

  20. Thanks Jt0323 thanked for this post
  21. #16
    Season Ticket Holder Firesole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,658
    Thanks (Given)
    1779
    Thanks (Received)
    1669
    Rep Power
    167

    Default

    You can't commit that foul twice in a row. The 2nd time is a 15 yard penalty and no time run off the clock.

  22. #17
    Resident Pats fan. McLovin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    North Cacalaka
    Age
    36
    Posts
    9,852
    Thanks (Given)
    5358
    Thanks (Received)
    5146
    Rep Power
    428

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Firesole View Post
    You can't commit that foul twice in a row. The 2nd time is a 15 yard penalty and no time run off the clock.
    Yea but an 8 second run off when there is 20-30 seconds left is huge. you really dont need a second time.

  23. #18
    Insensitive to the Touch HardKoreXXX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Coral Springs, FL
    Age
    33
    Posts
    20,630
    Thanks (Given)
    6233
    Thanks (Received)
    14402
    Rep Power
    1125

    Default

    They could make it a 15 yard personal foul if it occurs within the last minute of a half. Problem solved.


    "Making people on the Internet feel better about their own lives since 2004"

  24. #19
    Season Ticket Holder Firesole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,658
    Thanks (Given)
    1779
    Thanks (Received)
    1669
    Rep Power
    167

    Default

    The refs have the right to determine if that strategy is a palpably unfair act, and according to the rules book, a touchdown could have been awarded to the Patriots had the Giants used this Polish Defense

  25. #20
    'Parcells' Guy Laces Out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Omaha, Ne
    Posts
    3,499
    Thanks (Given)
    720
    Thanks (Received)
    966
    Rep Power
    101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jt0323 View Post
    I thought thats was a good challenge...if reversed games pretty much over

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
    What about that play looked remotely worth challenging? Especially when Bellicheck was standing right in front of the play. Instead of keeping the timeout in his back pocket(which he ended up needing in a bad way), he just wasted it on a play that wasn't even close. Poor management IMO

  26. Thanks DeDolfan thanked for this post

Similar Threads

  1. NFL Rulebook 2009-2010
    By LandShark13 in forum Lounge
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-17-2010, 11:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •