Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: And thats the loophole in the NFL Rulebook

  1. #1
    I BELIEVE! Darrelle Revis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,105
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 237 Times in 113 Posts
    Rep Power
    42

    Thumbs down And thats the loophole in the NFL Rulebook

    On the Patriots last drive, not on the last play (since game cant end on a defensive penalty) but on a few of their last plays the Giants should have put their entire 53 man roster on the field to play defense in order to milk the clock. Sounds crazy right? But its true. Ive said it all year, it doesnt make any sense how there is no such thing as a a pre-snap too many men on the field penalty on the defense. Its only on the defense once the ball is snapped.


    To combat this, the best the Patriots can do is snap the ball and spike it which would run 2 seconds off the clock. Do that enough times and you leave the Patriots with 1 play left to score (since game cant end on a defensive penalty).

    As you saw, this was critical on the Pats last drive. With 17 seconds left, they had a play run 8 seconds off the clock where the Giants have 12 men on the field. 5 Yard penalty on the Giants. But good play for the Giants! Why wouldnt they trade the 5 yards for an 8 second runoff?

    To combat this loophole, either:
    A. Make too many men on the field a pre snap penalty on defenses (just like it is on the offense), or
    B. As my roomate suggested, make too many men on the field penalty in the last 2 minutes of the half, so that the offense should be awarded the yards AND the clock should revert to the amount of time that was left before the play started.
    Darrelle Revis = Greatest Defensive Player of All-Time.


  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Darrelle Revis For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Super Moderator Boik14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York
    Age
    37
    Posts
    62,260
    Thanks
    38,108
    Thanked 18,855 Times in 10,402 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    1737

    Default

    Astute point! That play alone is a reason the pats lost. Lost 8 seconds and couldn't get close enough to take more then 2 shots. Oh well. I'm not exactly crying for the Cheatriots


    Credit to Imeister for this gem...
    [/QUOTE]

    Dream draft 1: http://www.first-pick.com/NFL/DraftGame.aspx
    2: http://www.first-pick.com/NFL/DraftGame.aspx

  4. #3
    Starter Layfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    429
    Thanks
    69
    Thanked 205 Times in 92 Posts
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Yeah that was pretty dumb.

  5. #4
    Benevolent Despot Muck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sunny Florida
    Posts
    14,027
    Thanks
    2,511
    Thanked 19,994 Times in 5,966 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    1198

    Default

    I was saying the exact same thing as it happened. I'd have thrown 15 men out there and give them 5 yards while the clock bled.
    Follow us @DolphinsNews. David Hasselhoff does. So should you.

    Become and remain familiar with the Forum Rules | Don't retaliate! Report the post () and use the Ignore Feature.


  6. #5
    Chaotic Neutral Paul 13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    66,546
    Thanks
    26,359
    Thanked 21,895 Times in 11,364 Posts
    Rep Power
    1897

    Default

    But the 12th man had no affect on the specific play involved. It was Tuck (IIRC) walking off the field that was the 12th guy when the ball was snapped. Is it a loophole that should be closed? Absolutely. Did it cost the Pats the game? Absolutely not.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Paul 13 For This Useful Post:


  8. #6
    Premium Member padre31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    inching to 100k posts
    Posts
    99,126
    Thanks
    18,826
    Thanked 36,911 Times in 20,845 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    2917

    Default

    Personally I think the Defense should take the penalty when the offense has them in bad personnel packages and they are using the no huddle to prevent subs, makes more sense then letting the opponent score or using a timeout.

  9. #7
    Fins Up! Jt0323's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Age
    26
    Posts
    11,966
    Thanks
    2,894
    Thanked 6,497 Times in 2,918 Posts
    Blog Entries
    21
    Rep Power
    476

    Default

    I agree 100%. The rule should change to 5 yard penalty plus the time lost

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk

  10. #8
    'Parcells' Guy Nappy Roots's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Bradenton,FL
    Age
    29
    Posts
    9,216
    Thanks
    2,705
    Thanked 3,259 Times in 1,843 Posts
    Rep Power
    299

    Default

    It can't be yards plus time lost. Because then your not only giving them that, your giving them a absolute free untimed play basically. What's to stop the offenses running around for 2 minutes just trying to gain more then 5 yards? Laterals and stupid stuff like that....no that would ruin it. Keep it how it is. Most of the time to many men doesn't effect the offense, other then giving them a free play, because the 12th man is usually running toward the side line.

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nappy Roots For This Useful Post:


  12. #9
    'Parcells' Guy Laces Out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Omaha, Ne
    Posts
    3,499
    Thanks
    722
    Thanked 966 Times in 616 Posts
    Rep Power
    91

    Default

    The Patriots poor use of a challenge sure didn't help them. Nor their ability to execute(read:catch the ball) when the chips were down. Perhaps I am being realistic?

  13. #10
    Giggity byroan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NC
    Age
    29
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,476
    Thanked 11,438 Times in 4,551 Posts
    Rep Power
    761

    Default

    Except for the fact of this rule.

    Rule 12-3-2."The defense shall not commit successive or continued fouls to prevent a score."

    The Pats would have then been given a TD.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to byroan For This Useful Post:


  15. #11
    Premium Member DeDolfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth Beach
    Age
    66
    Posts
    19,444
    Thanks
    8,956
    Thanked 10,942 Times in 4,590 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darrelle Revis View Post
    On the Patriots last drive, not on the last play (since game cant end on a defensive penalty) but on a few of their last plays the Giants should have put their entire 53 man roster on the field to play defense in order to milk the clock. Sounds crazy right? But its true. Ive said it all year, it doesnt make any sense how there is no such thing as a a pre-snap too many men on the field penalty on the defense. Its only on the defense once the ball is snapped.


    To combat this, the best the Patriots can do is snap the ball and spike it which would run 2 seconds off the clock. Do that enough times and you leave the Patriots with 1 play left to score (since game cant end on a defensive penalty).

    As you saw, this was critical on the Pats last drive. With 17 seconds left, they had a play run 8 seconds off the clock where the Giants have 12 men on the field. 5 Yard penalty on the Giants. But good play for the Giants! Why wouldnt they trade the 5 yards for an 8 second runoff?

    To combat this loophole, either:
    A. Make too many men on the field a pre snap penalty on defenses (just like it is on the offense), or
    B. As my roomate suggested, make too many men on the field penalty in the last 2 minutes of the half, so that the offense should be awarded the yards AND the clock should revert to the amount of time that was left before the play started.
    But there is not too many men on the field until the ball is snapped. You have until then to get off the filed. On O, it's a penalty for having too many men in the huddle, not too many on the filed.
    DD....the #1 Delaware Dolfan..........................



    We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein




  16. #12
    Insensitive to the Touch HardKoreXXX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Coral Springs, FL
    Age
    32
    Posts
    20,594
    Thanks
    6,238
    Thanked 14,306 Times in 6,192 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    975

    Default

    I started a thread on this (just bumped it) a few months ago. It's called The Polish Goal Line Defense and was first used by Buddy Ryan. Major loophole.


    "Making people on the Internet feel better about their own lives since 2004"

  17. #13
    Fins Up! Jt0323's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Age
    26
    Posts
    11,966
    Thanks
    2,894
    Thanked 6,497 Times in 2,918 Posts
    Blog Entries
    21
    Rep Power
    476

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laces Out View Post
    The Patriots poor use of a challenge sure didn't help them. Nor their ability to execute(read:catch the ball) when the chips were down. Perhaps I am being realistic?
    I thought thats was a good challenge...if reversed games pretty much over

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk

  18. #14
    Consume Me Aqua4Ever04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Age
    27
    Posts
    27,120
    Thanks
    4,663
    Thanked 16,148 Times in 7,224 Posts
    Rep Power
    1201

    Default

    How is it a loophole? It could happen MAYBE one time then an offense will identify all the players on the field, take the snap, take a knee and achieve their five yards in one second.
    TOUCHDOWN!...CHAMBERS!

  19. #15
    Insensitive to the Touch HardKoreXXX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Coral Springs, FL
    Age
    32
    Posts
    20,594
    Thanks
    6,238
    Thanked 14,306 Times in 6,192 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    975

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aqua4Ever04 View Post
    How is it a loophole? It could happen MAYBE one time then an offense will identify all the players on the field, take the snap, take a knee and achieve their five yards in one second.
    You're almost guaranteed to kill 8 seconds with it. There's no way in Hell an offense is going to notice that pre-snap and spike the ball. Even if they did notice, they're most likely going to take a shot to get a free play. When there's 20 second left in the game, it's a pretty nice advantage for the defense to have.

    The only thing that could be done, would be to put the time back on the clock and replay the down. OR give the offense a completely untimed down. Meaning, the clock would not start for next play, at all. Basketball has rules to prevent teams from doing similar things (you can't foul a guy without the ball in the last two minutes, etc.)


    "Making people on the Internet feel better about their own lives since 2004"

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to HardKoreXXX For This Useful Post:


  21. #16
    Season Ticket Holder Firesole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,658
    Thanks
    1,775
    Thanked 1,669 Times in 898 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Default

    You can't commit that foul twice in a row. The 2nd time is a 15 yard penalty and no time run off the clock.

  22. #17
    Resident Pats fan. McLovin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    North Cacalaka
    Age
    35
    Posts
    9,556
    Thanks
    5,158
    Thanked 4,926 Times in 2,237 Posts
    Rep Power
    364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Firesole View Post
    You can't commit that foul twice in a row. The 2nd time is a 15 yard penalty and no time run off the clock.
    Yea but an 8 second run off when there is 20-30 seconds left is huge. you really dont need a second time.

  23. #18
    Insensitive to the Touch HardKoreXXX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Coral Springs, FL
    Age
    32
    Posts
    20,594
    Thanks
    6,238
    Thanked 14,306 Times in 6,192 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    975

    Default

    They could make it a 15 yard personal foul if it occurs within the last minute of a half. Problem solved.


    "Making people on the Internet feel better about their own lives since 2004"

  24. #19
    Season Ticket Holder Firesole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,658
    Thanks
    1,775
    Thanked 1,669 Times in 898 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Default

    The refs have the right to determine if that strategy is a palpably unfair act, and according to the rules book, a touchdown could have been awarded to the Patriots had the Giants used this Polish Defense

  25. #20
    'Parcells' Guy Laces Out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Omaha, Ne
    Posts
    3,499
    Thanks
    722
    Thanked 966 Times in 616 Posts
    Rep Power
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jt0323 View Post
    I thought thats was a good challenge...if reversed games pretty much over

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
    What about that play looked remotely worth challenging? Especially when Bellicheck was standing right in front of the play. Instead of keeping the timeout in his back pocket(which he ended up needing in a bad way), he just wasted it on a play that wasn't even close. Poor management IMO

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to Laces Out For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. NFL Rulebook 2009-2010
    By LandShark13 in forum Lounge
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-17-2010, 11:40 AM
  2. Canadian PM employs loophole in potential power grab
    By Celtkin in forum Political Forum (POFO)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-08-2008, 12:50 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •